Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Hardill, Irene and Mills, Sarah 2013. Enlivening evidence-based policy through embodiment and emotions. Contemporary Social Science, Vol. 8, Issue. 3, p. 321.


Multi-disciplinarity, user engagement and the design of special programmes of ageing research in the United Kingdom

  • DOI:
  • Published online: 03 May 2012

Since 1997 ageing research in the United Kingdom (UK) has been promoted through a series of research council special programmes with an emphasis on multi-disciplinary, collaborative, user-focused research. There has been notable progress and substantial setbacks, especially a major lull in activity, and strong disciplinary biases in later programmes. Skills, expertise and influence on policy and practice, developed through early programmes, have been lost. Two philosophies of programme management have emerged: a top-down approach to the development of priorities and activities, largely reflecting a linear model of research, development and diffusion; and, a bottom-up approach strongly influenced by the priorities of users including older people, which has emphasised the role of problem-solving and social interaction between researchers and users. A comparison of these two philosophies highlights factors which contribute to successful programme implementation and valuable outcomes for society at large. These emphasise: involvement of all potential users; encouragement of champions; supporting researchers at all stages in their careers; transparency in communicating intent, progress and achievements; varied and robust knowledge transfer; and, above all else, understanding the challenges faced by individuals as they grow older. Future programmes would be assured of making significant contributions to supporting older people and an ageing society if those commissioning the programmes recognised the importance of these factors and accepted the consequent challenges for the organisation of the programmes.

Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Peter Lansley, School of Construction Management and Engineering, The University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6BU, UK. E-mail:
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

A. Achenbaum 1995. Crossing Frontiers: Gerontology Emerges as a Science. Cambridge University Press, New York.

C. Caswill and E. Shove 2000. Introducing interactive social science. Science and Public Policy, 27, 3, 154–7.

G. Evans 2002. National initiatives in ageing research in the United Kingdom. Age and Ageing, 31, 2, 93–5.

P. Lansley 2001. Building research and the quality-of-life. Building Research and Information, 29, 1, 6274.

P. Lansley 2006. EQUAL: new horizons for ageing research. Quality in Ageing, 7, 1, 613.

P. Lansley 2010. SPARC: a new model for supporting ageing research. Quality in Ageing, 11, 1, 715.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Ageing & Society
  • ISSN: 0144-686X
  • EISSN: 1469-1779
  • URL: /core/journals/ageing-and-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *