Skip to main content
×
×
Home

‘Returning the love’, not ‘balancing the books’: talk about delayed reciprocity in supporting ageing parents

  • LAURA M. FUNK (a1)
Abstract

A desire to ‘return’ or ‘pay back’ past care has been identified as a potential motivator of support provided by adult children to their ageing parents. The purpose of this study is to examine whether, how and in what ways adult children interpret and apply the concept of delayed reciprocity in filial relationships. Twenty-eight men and women supporting one or both ageing parent(s) in a Western Canadian city participated in a qualitative study of filial responsibility. Data were analysed interpretively, using thematic coding, contextualised reflection and guiding questions. Findings suggest delayed reciprocity is limited as an interpretive framework for describing parent support. Overall, comments reflected qualification or rejection of ‘paying back’ in the sense of a filial contract. Delayed reciprocity appears for most participants to symbolise imbalance, expectedness or obligation, and a lack of affection. In response, participants tended to reject delayed reciprocity in favour of interpretations emphasising mutuality, family role duties and reciprocated love. Findings are discussed in relation to interpretive purposes, symbolic meanings of parent support, participant characteristics and cultural contexts.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Laura M. Funk, Centre on Aging, University of Victoria, PO BOX 1700, STN CSC, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada V8W 2Y2. E-mail: lmfunk@uvic.ca
References
Hide All
Akiyama, H., Antonucci, T. C. and Campbell, R. 1997. Exchange and reciprocity among two generations of Japanese and American women. In Sokolovsky, J. (ed.), The Cultural Context of Aging: Worldwide Perspectives. Second edition, Bergin and Garvey, Westport, Connecticut, 114.
Antonucci, T. C. 1985. Personal characteristics, social support, and social behavior. In Binstock, R. H. and Shanas, E. (eds), Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 94128.
Atkinson, P., Coffey, C. and Delamont, S. 2003. Key Themes in Qualitative Research: Continuities and Change. Alta Mira Press, Walnut Creek, California.
Baines, C., Evans, P. and Neysmith, S. 1998. Women's caring: work expanding, state contracting. In Baines, C., Evans, P. and Neysmith S. (eds), Women's Caring: Feminist Perspectives on Social Welfare. Second edition, Oxford University Press, Toronto, 322.
Beck, U. and Beck-Gernsheim, E. 2001. Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and its Social and Political Consequences. Sage, London.
Becker, G., Beyene, Y., Newsome, E. and Mayen, N. 2003. Creating continuity through mutual assistance: intergenerational reciprocity in four ethnic groups. Journals of Gerontology, 58B, 3, S1519.
Bengtson, V. L. and Roberts, R. E. L. 1991. Intergenerational solidarity in aging families: an example of formal theory construction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 53, 856–70.
Blieszner, R. and Hamon, R. R. 1992. Filial responsibility: attitudes, motivators, and behaviors. In Dwyer, J. W. and Coward, R. T. (eds), Gender, Families, and Elder Care. Sage, Newbury Park, California, 105–19.
Brakman, S. V. 1995. Filial responsibility and long-term care decision making. In McCullough, L. B. and Wilson, N. L. (eds), Long-term Care Decisions: Ethical and Conceptual Dimensions. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, 181–96.
Breheny, M. and Stephens, C. 2009. ‘I sort of pay back in my own little way’: managing independence and social connectedness through reciprocity. Ageing & Society, 29, 8, 1295–313.
Call, K. T., Finch, M. A., Huck, S. M. and Kane, R. A. 1999. Caregiver burden from a social exchange perspective: caring for older people after hospital discharge. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61, 688–99.
Cantor, M. H. and Brennan, M. 2000. Social Care of the Elderly: The Effects of Ethnicity, Class and Culture. Springer, New York.
Carruth, A. K., Tate, U. S., Moffett, B. S. and Hill, K. 1997. Reciprocity, emotional well-being, and family functioning as determinants of family satisfaction in caregivers of elderly parents. Nursing Research, 46, 2, 93100.
Clarke, E. 2001. Ageing and Caregiving in Canada. Edwin Mellen Press, Lewiston, New York.
Cranswick, K. and Dosman, D. 2008. Eldercare: what we know today. Canadian Social Trends, 89, 4856.
Dwyer, J. W., Lee, G. R. and Jankowski, T. B. 1994. Reciprocity, elder satisfaction, and caregiver stress and burden: the exchange of aid in the family caregiving relationship. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 1, 3543.
Finch, J. and Mason, J. 1993. Negotiating Family Responsibilities. Tavistock/Routledge, London.
Fine, G. A. 2005. Individualization, risk, and the body: sociology and care. Journal of Sociology, 41, 3, 247–66.
Funk, L. M. 2008. Responsibility for aging parents: independence and obligation within filial relationships. PhD dissertation, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada.
Funk, L. M. 2010 a. The interpretive dynamics of filial and collective responsibility for aging parents. Canadian Review of Sociology, 47, 1, 7192.
Funk, L. M. 2010 b. Prioritizing parental autonomy: adult children's accounts of feeling responsible and supporting aging parents. Journal of Aging Studies, 24, 5764.
George, L. K. 1986. Caregiver burden: conflict between norms of reciprocity and solidarity. In Pillemer, K. A. and Wolf, R. S. (eds), Elder Abuse: Conflict in the Family. Auburn House, Dover, Massachusetts, 6792.
Gouldner, A. W. 1960. The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 2, 161–78.
Grundy, E. 2005. Reciprocity in relationships: socio-economic and health influences on intergenerational exchanges between third age parents and their adult children in Great Britain. British Journal of Sociology, 56, 2, 233–56.
Gubrium, J. F. 1988. Family responsibility and caregiving in the qualitative analysis of the Alzheimer's Disease experience. Journal of Marriage and Family, 50, 1, 197207.
Gubrium, J. F. and Holstein, J. A. 1997. The New Language of Qualitative Method. Oxford University Press, New York.
Gubrium, J. F. and Holstein, J. A. 2000. Analyzing interpretive practice. In Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (eds), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, 487508.
Hansen, K. V. 2004. The asking rules of reciprocity in networks of care for children. Qualitative Sociology, 27, 4, 421–37.
Henretta, J. C., Hill, M. S., Soldo, W. L. B. J. and Wolf, D. A. 1997. Selection of children to provide care: the effect of earlier parental transfers. Journals of Gerontology, 52B, special issue, 110–9.
Hochschild, A. R. 1983. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. University of California Press, Berkeley, California.
Holroyd, E. 2003. Chinese family obligations toward chronically ill elderly members: comparing caregivers in Beijing and Hong Kong. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 3, 302–18.
Holstein, J. A. and Gubrium, J. F. 1994. Phenomenology, ethnomethodology, and interpretive practice. In Denzin, N. K. and Kendig, H. (eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, 262–72.
Hong, Y. and Liu, W. 2000. The social psychological perspective of elderly care. In Liu, W. and Kendig, H. (eds), Who Should Care for the Elderly? Singapore University Press, Singapore, 165–82.
Hsu, H.-C. and Shyu, Y.-I. L. 2003. Implicit exchanges in family caregiving for frail elders in Taiwan. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 8, 1078–93.
Jansson, W., Almberg, B., Grafstrom, M. and Winblad, B. 1998. A daughter is a daughter for the whole of her life: a study of daughters' responsibility for parents with dementia. Health Care in Later Life, 3, 4, 272–84.
Keller, S. 2006. Four theories of filial duty. The Philosophical Quarterly, 56, 223, 254–74.
Klaus, D. 2009. Why do adult children support their parents? Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 40, 2, 227–41.
Klein-Ikkink, K., van Tilburg, T. and Knipscheer, K. C. P. M. 1999. Perceived instrumental support exchanges in relationships between elderly parents and their adult children: normative and structural explanations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 4, 831–44.
Koh, S. K. and MacDonald, M. 2006. Financial reciprocity and elder care: interdependent resource transfers. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 27, 3, 420–36.
Komter, A. E. and Schans, D. 2008. Reciprocity revisited: give and take in Dutch and immigrant families. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 39, 2, 279–96.
Lewinter, M. 2003. Reciprocities in caregiving relationships in Danish elder care. Journal of Aging Studies, 17, 357–77.
Lu, L. 1997. Social support, reciprocity and wellbeing. Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 5, 618–28.
McGrew, K. 1998. Daughters’ caregiving decisions: from an impulse to a balancing point of care. Journal of Women and Aging, 10, 2, 4965.
Molm, L. D., Schaefer, D. R. and Collett, J. L. 2007. The value of reciprocity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 70, 2, 199217.
Moody, M. 2008. Serial reciprocity: a preliminary statement. Sociological Theory, 26, 2, 130–51.
Munsch, R. 1995. Love You Forever. Firefly Books, Richmond Hill, Canada.
Nakano Glenn, E. 2000. Creating a caring society. Contemporary Sociology, 29, 1, 8494.
Neufeld, A. and Harrison, M. J. 1995. Reciprocity and social support in caregivers’ relationships: variations and consequences. Qualitative Health Research, 5, 3, 348–65.
Parrott, T. M. and Bengston, V. L. 1999. The effects of earlier intergenerational affection, normative expectations, and family conflict on contemporary exchanges of help and support. Research on Aging, 21, 1, 73105.
Pyke, K. 2000. ‘Normal American family’ as an interpretive structure of family life among grown children of Korean and Vietnamese immigrants. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1, 240–55.
Schwarz, B., Trommsdorff, G., Albert, I. and Mayer, B. 2005. Adult parent–child relationships: relationship quality, support, and reciprocity. Applied Psychology, 54, 3, 396417.
Schwarz, B., Trommsdorff, G., Zheng, G. and Shi, S. 2010. Reciprocity in intergenerational support: a comparison of Chinese and German adult daughters. Journal of Family Issues, 31, 2, 234–56.
Selig, S., Tomlinson, T. and Hickey, T. 1991. Ethical dimensions of intergenerational reciprocity: implications for practice. Gerontologist, 31, 5, 624–30.
Sheehan, N. and Donorfio, L. 1999. Efforts to create meaning in the relationship between ageing mothers and their caregiving daughters: a qualitative study of caregiving. Journal of Aging Studies, 13, 2, 161–76.
Silverstein, M., Conroy, S. J., Wang, H., Giarrusso, R. and Bengston, V. L. 2002. Reciprocity in parent–child relations over the adult life course. Journals of Gerontology, 57B, 1, S313.
Smith, P. 1993. Family responsibility and the nature of obligation. In Tietjens Meyers, D., Kipnis, K. and Murphy, C. F. J. (eds), Kindred Matters: Rethinking the Philosophy of the Family. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, 4158.
Stark, O. 1995. Altruism and Beyond: An Economic Analysis of Transfers and Exchanges Within Families and gcroups. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Stoller, E. P. 1985. Exchange patterns in the informal support networks of the elderly: the impact of reciprocity on morale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 2, 335–42.
Stuifbergen, M. C. and Van Delden, J. J. M. 2011. Filial obligations to elderly parents: a duty to care? Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 14, 6371.
Uehara, E. S. 1995. Reciprocity reconsidered: Gouldner's ‘moral norm of reciprocity’ and social support. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 483502.
Verbrugge, L. M. and Chan, A. 2008. Giving help in return: family reciprocity by older Singaporeans. Ageing & Society, 28, 534.
Wong, O. M. H. and Chau, B. H. 2006. The evolving role of filial piety in eldercare in Hong Kong. Asian Journal of Social Sciences, 34, 600–17.
Wuest, J. 1998. Setting boundaries: a strategy for precarious ordering of women's caring demands. Research in Nursing and Health, 21, 3949.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Ageing & Society
  • ISSN: 0144-686X
  • EISSN: 1469-1779
  • URL: /core/journals/ageing-and-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 12
Total number of PDF views: 84 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 415 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th July 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.