Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T18:58:20.960Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Technical Efficiency of U. S. Organic Farmers: The Complementary Roles of Soil Management Techniques and Farm Experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Luanne Lohr  and
Timothy A. Park
Luanne Lohr
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics at the University of Georgia in Athens, Georgia
Timothy A. Park
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics at the University of Georgia in Athens, Georgia
Get access

Abstract

Agricultural policymakers place increasing emphasis on developing efficiency measures for organic producers in order to evaluate regulatory strategies and evolving organic market conditions. We develop technical efficiency measures for U. S. organic farmers using a stochastic production frontier. Farm decisions about acquiring and managing organic soil materials from on-farm and local sources are incorporated into the technical efficiency measure. Productivity differences between newer entrants to organic farming and more experienced producers are estimated in order to isolate the impact of learning and management expertise on farm-level technical efficiency.

Keywords

organic farmingfrontier production functionsoil organic matterperformance measurementtechnical efficiency
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , October 2006 , pp. 327 - 338
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

de Koeijer, T.J., Wossink, G.A.A., Smit, A. B., Janssens, S.R. M., Renkema, J.A., and Struik, P. C. 2003. “Assessment of the Quality of Farmers' Environmental Management and Its Effects on Resource Use Efficiency: A Dutch Case Study.” Agricultural Systems 78(1): 85–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duram, L.A. 2005. Good Growing: Why Organic Farming Works. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
El-Hage Scialabba, N., and Hattam, C. 2002. “General Concepts and Issues in Organic Agriculture.” In El-Hage Scialabba, N. and Hattam, C., eds., Organic Agriculture, Environment, and Food Security. Environment and Natural Resources Series No. 4, Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Rome.Google Scholar
Färe, R., and Zelenyuk, V. 2003. “On Aggregate Farrell Efficiencies.” European Journal of Operational Research 146(3): 615–620.Google Scholar
Foster, A. D., and Rosenzweig, M. R. 1995. “Learning by Doing and Learning from Others: Human Capital and Technical Change in Agriculture.” Journal of Political Economy 103(6): 1176–1209.Google Scholar
Fraser, I. M., and Horrace, W. C. 2003. “Technical Efficiency of Australian Wool Production: Point and Confidence Interval Estimates.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 20(2): 169–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, C., and Kremen, A. 2003. “U. S. Organic Farming in 2000–2001: Adoption of Certified Systems.” AIB No. 780, USDA Economic Research Service, Washington, D. C. (April).Google Scholar
Huffman, W. E. 2001. “Human Capital: Education and Agriculture.” In Gardner, B. L. and Rausser, G. C., eds., Handbook of Agricultural Economics (Vol. 1A). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Kumbhakar, S., and Lovell, C.A.K. 2000. Stochastic Frontier Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lohr, L., and Park, T. A. 2002. “Choice of Insect Management Portfolios by Organic Farmers: Lessons and Comparative Analysis.” Ecological Economics 43(1): 87–99.Google Scholar
Morrison-Paul, C. J., Johnston, W. E., and Frengley, G.A.G. 2000. “Efficiency in New Zealand Sheep and Beef Farming: The Impacts of Regulatory Reform.” Review of Economics and Statistics 82(2): 325–337.Google Scholar
OECD [see Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development].Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2001. “Environmental Indicators for Agriculture, Methods and Results: Executive Summary.” OECD, Paris. Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2003. “Agricultural Impacts on Soil Erosion and Soil Biodiversity.” OECD, Paris. Available at http://webdominol.oecd.org/comnet/agr/soil_ero_bio.nsf.Google Scholar
Oude Lansink, A., Pietola, K., and Backman, S. 2002. “Efficiency and Productivity of Conventional and Organic Farms in Finland 1994–1997.” European Review of Agricultural Economics 29(1): 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rigby, D., Woodhouse, P., Young, T., and Burton, M. 2001. “Constructing a Farm Level Indicator of Sustainable Agricultural Practice.” Ecological Economics 39(3): 463–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunding, D., and Zilberman, D. 2001. “The Agricultural Innovation Process: Research and Technology Adoption in a Changing Agricultural Sector.” In Gardner, B. L. and Rausser, G. C., eds., Handbook of Agricultural Economics (Vol. 1A). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Sustainable Agriculture Network. 1996. Sustainable Agriculture Directory of Expertise (3rd edition). Burlington, VT: Sustainable Agriculture Publications. Google Scholar
Tauer, L. W., and Lordkipanidze, N. 2000. “Farmer Efficiency and Technology Use with Age.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 29(1): 24–31.Google Scholar
Tzouvelekas, V., Pantzios, C., and Fotopoulos, C. 2001a. “Economic Efficiency in Organic Farming: Evidence from Cotton Farms in Viotia, Greece.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 33(1): 35–48.Google Scholar
Tzouvelekas, V., Pantzios, C., and Fotopoulos, C. 2001b. “Technical Efficiency of Alternative Farming Systems: The Case of Greek Organic and Conventional Olive-Growing Farms. Food Policy 26(6): 549–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walz, E. 1999. “Final Results of the Third Biennial National Organic Farmers' Survey.” Organic Farming Research Foundation, Santa Cruz, CA. Available at http://www.ofrf.org/publications/survey/Final.Results.Third.NOF.Survey.pdf (accessed March 2006).Google Scholar