Skip to main content
×
×
Home

U.S. Growers’ Willingness to Pay for Improvement in Rosaceous Fruit Traits

  • Chengyan Yue, Shuoli Zhao, Karina Gallardo, Vicki McCracken, James Luby and Jim McFerson...
Abstract

As growers adopt and diffuse improved food crop cultivars, their investment decisions for producing new cultivars control product accessibility and directly affect the entire supply chain. In this study, we estimated growers’ willingness to invest (willingness to pay (WTP)) in cultivars with improved quality traits for five rosaceous fruit crops: apple, peach, strawberry, sweet cherry, and tart cherry. WTP values differed by crop, but fruit flavor was consistently rated one of the most important traits, with higher WTP. This information will help breeding programs focus resources to develop superior cultivars for long-term economic sustainability of the rosaceous fruit industry.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      U.S. Growers’ Willingness to Pay for Improvement in Rosaceous Fruit Traits
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      U.S. Growers’ Willingness to Pay for Improvement in Rosaceous Fruit Traits
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      U.S. Growers’ Willingness to Pay for Improvement in Rosaceous Fruit Traits
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Corresponding author
Correspondence: Chengyan Yue ■ 1970 Folwell AvenueSt. Paul, MN 55108 ■ Phone 612.626.3974 ■ Email yuechy@umn.edu
Footnotes
Hide All

This research was funded by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Specialty Crop Research Initiative projects “RosBREED: Enabling marker-assisted breeding in Rosaceae” (2009-51181-05808) and “RosBREED: Combining Disease Resistance with Horticultural Quality” (2014-51181-22378).

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Colquhoun, T.A., Levin, L.A., Moskowitz, H.R., Whitaker, V.M., Clark, D.G., and Folta, K.M.. 2012. “Framing the Perfect Strawberry: An Exercise in Consumer-Assisted Selection of Fruit Crops.” Journal of Berry Research 2(1): 4561.
Crisosto, C.H., Crisosto, G.M., and Metheney, P.. 2003. “Consumer Acceptance of ‘Brooks’ and ‘Bing’ Cherries is Mainly Dependent on Fruit SSC and Visual Skin Color.” Postharvest Biology and Technology 28(1): 159167.
Dever, M.C., MacDonald, R.A., Cliff, M.A., and Lane, W.D.. 1996. “Sensory Evaluation of Sweet Cherry Cultivars.” HortScience 31(1): 150153.
Dillman, D., Smyth, J.D., and Christian, L.M.. 2009. Mail, Internet, and Mixed Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. New York: John Wiley.
Ding, M., and Lu, Y.. 2004. “Inhibition of AP-1 and Neoplastic Transformation by Fresh Apple Peel Extract.” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 279(11): 1067010676.
Ford, A., Hansen, K., Herrington, M., Moisander, J., Nottingham, S., Prytz, S., and Zorin, M.. 1996. “Subjective and Objective Determination of Strawberry Quality.” Acta Horticulturae, 439: 319323.
Gallardo, R.K., Nguyen, D., McCracken, V., Yue, C., Luby, J., and McFerson, J.. 2012. “An Investigation of Trait Prioritization in Rosaceous Fruit Breeding Programs.” HortScience 47(6): 771776.
Gallardo, R.K., Li, H., McCracken, V., Yue, C., Luby, J., and McFerson, J.. 2015. “Market Intermediaries’ Willingness to Pay for Apple, Peach, Cherry, and Strawberry Quality Traits.” Agribusiness 31(2): 259280.
Greene, W.H., and Hensher, D.A.. 2010. Modeling Ordered Choices: A Primer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Iezzoni, A. 2010. “Jewels in the Genome.” RosBREED Newsletter 1(1): 9.
Jesionkowska, K., Konopacka, D., and Ploscharski, W.. 2006. “The Quality of Apples – Preferences Among Consumers from Skierniewice, Poland.” Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research 14: 173182.
Jordan, J.L., Shewfelt, R.L., and Prussia, S.E.. 1986. “The Value of Peach Quality Characteristics in the Postharvest System.” In IX Symposium on Horticultural Economics 203: 175182.
Kajikawa, C. 1998. “Quality Level and Price in Japanese Apple Market.” Agribusiness 14(3): 227234.
Kappel, F., Fisher-Fleming, B., and Hogue, E.. 1996. “Fruit Characteristics and Sensory Traits of an Ideal Sweet Cherry.” HortScience 31(3): 443–46.
Lado, J., Vicente, E., Manzzioini, A., and Ares, G.. 2010. “Application of a Check-All-that-Apply Question for the Evaluation of Strawberry Cultivars from a Breeding Program.” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 90(13): 22682275.
Louviere, J.J., Hensher, D.A., and Swait, J.D.. 2000. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lusk, J.L., Jamal, M., Kurlander, L., Roucan, M., and Taulman, L.. 2005. “A Meta-Analysis of Genetically Modified Food Valuation Studies.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 30(1): 2844.
Lusk, J. and Hudson, D.. 2004. “Willingness-to-Pay Estimates and Their Relevance to Agribusiness Decision Making.” Review of Agricultural Economics 26(2): 152169.
Manalo, A.B. 1990. “Assessing the Importance of Apple Traits: An Agricultural Application of Conjoint Analysis.” Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 19(2): 118124.
McCluskey, J.J., Horn, B.P., Durham, C.A., Mittelhammer, R.C., and Hu, Y.. 2013. “Valuation of Internal Quality Characteristics across Apple Cultivars.” Agribusiness 29(2): 228241.
Ouma, E., Abdulai, A., and Drucker, A.. 2007. “Measuring Heterogeneous Preferences for Cattle Traits among Cattle-Keeping Households in East Africa.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 89(4): 10051019.
Park, T.A. and Florkowski, W.J.. 2003. “Selection of Peach Varieties and the Role of Quality Traits.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 28(1): 138151.
Parker, D.D., Zilberman, D., and Moulton, K.S.. 1991. “How Quality Relates to Price in California Fresh Peaches.” California Agriculture 45(2): 1416.
Predieri, S., Ragazzini, P., and Rondelli, R.. 2006. Sensory Evaluation and Peach Fruit Quality. Acta Horticulturae 713: 429434.
Ravaglia, G., Sansavini, S., Ventura, M., and Tabanelli, D.. 1996. “Indici di Maturazione e Miglioramiento Qualitative delle Pesche.” Fruitcoltora 3; 6166.
Safley, C.D., Wohlgenant, M.K., and Suter, R. Edens. 1999. Factors Affecting Consumers Purchases Direct Market Strawberries. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, ARE Report 22. North Carolina State University.
SAS Institute Inc. 2009. JMP® 8 User Guide, Second Edition. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
Serrano, M., Martínez-Romero, D., Castillo, S., Guillén, F., and Valero, D.. 2005. “The Use of Natural Antifungal Compounds Improves the Beneficial Effect of MAP in Sweet Cherry Storage.” Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies 6(1): 115–23.
Train, K. 2009. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tonsor, G.T., Olynk, N., and Wolf, C.. 2009. “Consumer Preference for Animal Welfare Attributes: The Case of Gestation Crates.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 41(3): 713730.
Siddiq, M., Iezzoni, A., Khan, A., Breen, P., Sebolt, A.M., Dolan, K.D., and Ravi, R.. 2011. “Characterization of New Tart Cherry (Prunus cerasus L.): Selections Based on Fruit Quality, Total Anthocyanins, and Antioxidant Capacity.” International Journal of Food Properties, 14(2), 471480.
Turner, J., Seavert, C., Colonna, A., and Long, L.E.. 2005. “Consumer Sensory Evaluation of Sweet Cherry Cultivars in Oregon, USA.” In V International Cherry Symposium 795: 781786.
Yue, C. and Tong, C.. 2011. “Consumer Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Existing and New Apple Varieties: Evidence from Apple Tasting Choice Experiments.” HortTechnology 21(3): 376–83.
Yue, C., Gallardo, R.K., Luby, J., Rihn, A., McFerson, J.R., McCracken, V., Bedford, D., Brown, S., Evans, K., Weebadde, C., and Sebolt, A.. 2013. “An Investigation of U.S. Apple Producers’ Trait Prioritization—Evidence from Audience Surveys.” HortScience 48(11): 13781384.
Yue, C., Gallardo, R.K., McCracken, V.A., Luby, J., McFerson, J.R., Liu, L., and Iezzoni, A.. 2012. “Technical and Socio-Economic Challenges to Setting and Implementing Priorities in North American Rosaceous Fruit Breeding Programs.” HortScience 47(9): 13201327.
Zapata, S.D. and Carpio, C.E.. 2014. “The Theoretical Structure of Producer Willingness to Pay Estimates.” Agricultural Economics 45(5): 613623.
Zheng, X., Yue, C., Gallardo, K., McCracken, V., Luby, J., and McFerson, J.. 2016. “What attributes are consumers looking for in sweet cherries? Evidence from choice experimentsAgricultural and Resource Economics Review 45(1): 124142.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Agricultural and Resource Economics Review
  • ISSN: 1068-2805
  • EISSN: 2372-2614
  • URL: /core/journals/agricultural-and-resource-economics-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 72
Total number of PDF views: 638 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 392 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 20th March 2017 - 15th August 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.