Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Sketching across design domains: Roles and formalities

  • Claudia Eckert (a1), Alan Blackwell (a2), Martin Stacey (a3), Christopher Earl (a1) and Luke Church (a2)...

To complement studies on design sketching within particular phases of design processes in specific design domains, this paper analyzes descriptions of design processes given by designers from a wide variety of fields. This research forms part of a wider project on comparisons across design domains and draws attention to the many types and properties of sketches in different contexts. Further, it focuses on the multiple roles that sketching can take in idea generation, as well as in reasoning and communicating design ideas. In particular this paper examines how the different types and roles of sketches can be more or less formal and how this can lead to misunderstandings.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

A. Black (1990). Visible planning on paper and on screen: the impact of working medium on decision-making by novice graphic designers. Behaviour and Information Technology 9(4), 283.

A.F. Blackwell , C.M. Eckert , L.L. Bucciarelli , & C.F. Earl (2009). Witnesses to design: a phenomenology of comparative design. Design Issues 25(1), 3647.

A.F. Blackwell , & T.R.G. Green (2003). Notational systems—the cognitive dimensions of notations framework. In HCI Models, Theories and Frameworks: Toward a Multidisciplinary Science ( J.M. Carroll , Ed.), pp. 103134. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

A.F. Blackwell , R.L. Hewson , & T.R.G. Green (2003). Product design to support user abstractions. In Handbook of Cognitive Task Design ( E. Hollnagel , Ed.), pp. 525545. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

J.-F. Boujut , & E. Blanco (2003). Intermediary objects as a means to foster co-operation in engineering design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 12, 205219.

P.R. Carlile (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science 13, 442455.

S. DeLahunta , W. McGregor , & A.F. Blackwell (2004). Transactables. Performance Research 9(2), 6772.

M. Downie (2008). Field—a new environment for making digital art. Computers in Entertainment 6(4), Article 54.

C.M. Eckert (2001). The communication bottleneck in knitwear design: analysis and computing solutions. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 10(1), 2974.

C.M. Eckert , A.D. Blackwell , L.L. Bucciarelli , & C.F. Earl (2010). Shared conversations across design. Design Issues 26(3), 2739.

C.M. Eckert , & M.K. Stacey (2000). Sources of inspiration: a language of design. Design Studies 21(5), 523538.

G. Goldschmidt (1991). The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal 4, 123143.

G. Goldschmidt (1994). On visual design thinking: the vis kids of architecture. Design Studies 15, 158174.

G. Goldschmidt (2003). The backtalk of self-generated sketches. Design Issues 19(1), 7288.

T.R.G. Green , & M. Petre (1996). Usability analysis of visual programming environments: a ‘cognitive dimensions’ approach. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 7, 131174.

K. Henderson (1991). Flexible sketches and inflexible databases: visual communication, conscription devices, and boundary objects in design engineering. Science, Technology, & Human Values 16, 448473.

O. Hisarciklilar , & J.-F. Boujut (2009). An annotation model to reduce ambiguity in design communication. Research in Engineering Design 20, 171184.

F. Heylighen (1999). Advantages and limitations of formal expression. Foundations of Science 4, 2556.

A.J. Ko , R. Abraham , L. Beckwith , A.F. Blackwell , M. Burnett , M. Erwig , J. Lawrence , H. Lieberman , B. Myers , M.-B. Rosson , G. Rothermel , C. Scaffidi , M. Shaw , & S. Wiedenbeck (2011). The state of the art in end-user software engineering. ACM Computing Surveys 43(3), Article 21.

T. Love (2002). Constructing a coherent cross-disciplinary body of theory about designing and designs: some philosophical issues. Design Studies 23(3), 345361.

D.A. Morand (1995). The role of behavioral formality and informality in the enactment of bureaucratic versus organic organizations. Academy of Management Review 20, 831872.

I. Neilson , & J. Lee (1994). Conversations with graphics: implications for the design of natural language/graphics interfaces. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies 40, 509541.

E. Pei , I.R. Campbell , & M.A. Evans (2010). Development of a tool for building shared representations among industrial designers and engineering designers. CoDesign 6, 139166.

E. Pei , I.R. Campbell , & M.A. Evans (2011). A taxonomic classification of visual design representations used by industrial designers and engineering designers. Design Journal 14, 6491.

A.T. Purcell , & J.S. Gero (1998). Drawings and the design process. Design Studies 19, 389430.

D.A. Schön , & G. Wiggins (1992). Kinds of seeing and their function in designing. Design Studies 13, 135156.

M.K. Stacey , & C.M. Eckert (2003). Against ambiguity. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 12, 153183.

S.L. Star , & J. Griesemer (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals on Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology. Social Studies of Science 19, 387420.

J.C. Tang (1991). Findings from observational studies of collaborative work. International Journal of Man–Machine Studies 34, 143160.

D.G. Ullman , S. Wood , & D. Craig (1990). The importance of drawing in the mechanical design process. Computers & Graphics 14, 263274.

R. Van der Lugt (2005). How sketching can affect the idea generation process in design group meetings. Design Studies 26, 101122.

M.C. Yang (2009). Observations on concept generation and sketching in engineering design. Research in Engineering Design 20, 111.

M.C. Yang , & J.G. Cham (2007). An analysis of sketching skill and its role in early stage engineering design. Journal of Mechanical Design 129, 476482.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 0890-0604
  • EISSN: 1469-1760
  • URL: /core/journals/ai-edam
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 21 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 153 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 28th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.