Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-s82fj Total loading time: 0.357 Render date: 2022-10-04T07:36:15.698Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": true, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Technological Organization and Hunter-Gatherer Land Use: A California Example

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Douglas B. Bamforth*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Hellems Building, Campus Box 233, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0233

Abstract

Recent research has identified a number of general factors with important effects on flaked-stone technology but has been less effective in solving the problem of examining these factors in specific archaeological contexts. This paper discusses this issue and presents a case study focused on mobility patterns in one area of coastal California to exemplify one approach to dealing with it. This study emphasizes the importance of considering, first, the ways in which local conditions mediate the effects of global aspects of human adaptations and, second, the interactions between multiple causal factors as conditioners of technology. This example highlights the role played by multiple, distinct technological strategies within a single pattern of activity as well as the potential ambiguity of the relations between these strategies and global mobility patterns.

Résumé

Résumé

Recientes investigaciones han identificado un número de factores generates con efectos importantes en la tecnología de material lítico, pero han sido menos effectivas para resolver elproblema de la examinación de estos factores en contextos arqueológicos específicos. Este trabajo toca este tema y presenta un estudio enfocado en pat rones de movilidad en una zona costera de California para ejemplificar estos factores. Éste se concentra en la importancia de considerar, primero, la manera en que las condiciones locales median en los efectos de aspectos globales de la adaptación humana y, segundo, las influencias recíprocas entre factores causales múltiples como condicionantes de la tecnología. Este ejemplo enfoca el papel desempeñado por múltiples y distintas estrategias tecnológicas dentro de un mismo patrón de actividad así como la ambigüedad potencial de las relaciones entre estas estrategias y los modelos globales de movilidad.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Arnold, J. 1987 Craft Specialization in the Prehistoric Channel Islands, California. University of California Publications in Anthropology Vol. 18. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Bamforth, D. 1984 Analysis of Chipped Stone Artifacts. In Archaeological Investigations on the San Antonio Terrace, Vandenberg Air Force Base, California, in Connection with M-X Facilities Construction, edited by Glassow, M., pp. 9.19.197. Chambers, Consultants and Planners, Stanton, California.Google Scholar
Bamforth, D. 1985 The Technological Organization of Paleoindian Small-Group Bison Hunting on the Llano Estacado. Plains Anthropologist 30 : 243258.Google Scholar
Bamforth, D. 1986 Technological Efficiency and Tool Curation. American Antiquity 51 : 3850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamforth, D. 1988 Investigating Microwear Polishes with Blind Tests : The Institute Results in Context. Journal of Archaeological Science 15 : 1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamforth, D. 1990a Settlement, Raw Material, and Lithic Procurement in the Central Mojave Desert. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 9 : 70104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamforth, D. 1990b Prehistoric Land-Use : The Flaked Stone Evidence. In Analysis and Synthesis, edited by Woodman, C., Rudolph, J, and Rudolph, T., pp. 7.17.128. Prehistoric Resource Use and Settlement in the Santa Ynez River Basin, vol. I. Science Applications International Corporation, Santa Barbara, California.Google Scholar
Bamforth, D., Burns, G., and Woodman, C. 1990 Ambiguous Use Traces and Blind Test Results : New Data. Journal of Archaeological Science 17 : 413430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binford, L. 1977 Forty-Seven Trips. In Stone Tools as Cultural Markers, edited by Wright, R. V. S., pp. 2436. Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, Canberra.Google Scholar
Binford, L. 1979 Organization and Formation Processes : Looking at Curated Technologies. Journal of Anthropological Research 35 : 255273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binford, L. 1980 Willow Smoke and Dog's Tails : Hunter-Gatherer Settlement Systems and Archaeological Site Formation. American Antiquity 45 : 420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binford, L. 1986 An Alyawara Day : Making Men's Knives and Beyond. American Antiquity 51 : 547562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binford, L., and Connell, J. O. 1984 An Alyawara Day : The Stone Quarry. Journal of Anthropological Research 40 : 406432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleed, P. 1986 The Optimal Design of Hunting Weapons : Maintainability or Reliability? American Antiquity 51:737747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowser, B., Hudson, J., and Rudolph, J. 1990 Prehistoric Resource Use. In Analysis and Synthesis, edited by Woodman, C., Rudolph, J, and Rudolph, T., pp. 6.16.66. Prehistoric Resource Use and Settlement in the Santa Ynez River Basin, vol. 1. Science Applications International Corporation, Santa Barbara, California.Google Scholar
Brink, J. 1978 An Experimental Study of Microwear Formation on Endscrapers. Mercury Series Paper No. 83. National Museum of Man, Archaeological Survey of Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Cahen, D., Keeley, L, and Noten, F. Van 1979 Stone Tools, Toolkits, and Human Behavior in Prehistory. Current Anthropology 20 : 661684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callahan, E. 1979 The Basics of Biface Manufacture in the Eastern Fluted-Point Tradition. Archaeology of Eastern North America 7 : 1180.Google Scholar
Carr, C. 1984 The Nature of Organization of Intrasite Archaeological Records and Spatial Analytical Approaches to Their Investigation. In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 7, edited by Schiffer, M. B., pp. 103222. Academic Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flenniken, J. 1984 The Past, Present, and Future of Flintknapping : An Anthropological Perspective. Annual Review of Anthropology 13 : 187203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbis, R., and Sperry, J. 1952 An Early Man Site in Montana. American Antiquity 18 : 127133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frison, G., and Stanford, D. 1982 The Agate Basin Site. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Glassow, M. 1981 Archaeological Data Recovery Program in Relation to Space Shuttle Development, Vandenberg Air Force Base, California. Social Process Research Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Glassow, M. 1984 Prehistoric Chronology. In Archaeological Investigations on the San Antonio Terrace, Vandenberg Air Force Base, California, in Connection with MX Facilities Construction, edited by Glassow, M., pp. 7.17.7. Chambers, Consultants and Planners, Stanton, California.Google Scholar
Glassow, M. (editor) 1984 Archaeological Investigations on the San Antonio Terrace, Vandenberg Air Force Base, California, in Connection with MX Facilities Construction. Chambers, Consultants and Planners, Stanton, California.Google Scholar
Glassow, M., and Wilcoxen, L. 1988 Coastal Adaptations Near Point Conception, California, with Particular Regard to Shellfish Exploitation. A merican A ntiquity 53 : 3651.Google Scholar
Glassow, M., Wilcoxen, L., and Erlandson, J. 1988 Cultural and Environmental Change During the Early Period of Santa Barbara Channel Prehistory. In The Archaeology of Prehistoric Coastlines, edited by Bailey, G. and Parkington, J., pp. 6477. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Goodyear, A. 1989 A Hypothesis for the Use of Cryptocrystalline Raw Materials among Paleoindian Groups of North America. In Eastern Paleoindian Lithic Resource Use, edited by Ellis, C. and Lothrop, J., pp. 110. Westview Press, Boulder.Google Scholar
Grivetti, M. 1984 Chert Source Identification. In Archaeological Investigations on the San Antonio Terrace, Vandenberg Air Force Base, California, in Connection with M-XFacilities Construction, edited by Glassow, M., pp. 8.18.14. Chambers, Consultants and Planners, Stanton, California.Google Scholar
Hayden, B. 1987 From Chopper to Celt : The Evolution of Resharpening Techniques. Lithic Technology 16 : 3343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeley, L. 1980 Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Uses. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Keeley, L. 1982 Hafting and Retooling : Effects on the Archaeological Record. American Antiquity 47 : 798809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, R. 1988 The Three Sides of a Biface. American Antiquity 53 : 717734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, R., and Todd, L. 1988 Coming into the Country : Early Paleoindian Hunting and Mobility. American Antiquity 53 : 231244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, C. 1981 The Evolution of Chumash Society : A Comparative Study of Artifacts Used in Social System Maintenance in the Santa Barbara Channel Region Before 1804. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
King, C. 1990 Ethnohistoric Resource Use. In Analysis and Synthesis, edited by Woodman, C., Rudolph, J, and Rudolph, T., pp. 5.15.51. Prehistoric Resource Use and Settlement in the Santa Ynez River Basin, vol. 1. Science Applications International Corporation, Santa Barbara, California.Google Scholar
Kintigh, K. 1989 Sample Size, Significance, and Measures of Diversity. In Quantifying Diversity in Archaeology, edited by Leonard, R. and Jones, G., pp. 2137. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Knudson, R. 1983 Organizational Variability in Late Paleoindian Assemblages. Report of Investigations No. 60. Laboratory of Anthropology, Washington State University, Pullman.Google Scholar
Landberg, L. 1965 The Chumash Indians of Southern California. Southwest Museum Papers No. 19. Los Angeles.Google Scholar
O. Connell, J. 1987 Alyawara Site Structure and its Archaeological Implications. American Antiquity 52 : 74108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OUauson, D. 1983 Experiments to Investigate the Effects of Heat Treatment on Use-Wear on Flint Tools. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 49 : 113.Google Scholar
Parry, W., and Kelly, R. 1988 Expedient Core Technology and Sedentism. In The Organization of Core Technology, edited by Johnson, J. and Morrow, C., pp. 285304. Westview Press, Boulder.Google Scholar
Peter, K. 1990 Site Structural Complexity. In Analysis and Synthesis, edited by Woodman, C., Rudolph, J, and Rudolph, T., pp. 9.49.60. Prehistoric Resource Use and Settlement in the Santa Ynez River Basin, vol. 1. Science Applications International Corporation, Santa Barbara, California.Google Scholar
Rick, J. 1978 Heat-Altered Cherts of the Lower Illinois Valley : An Experimental Study in Prehistoric Technology. Northwestern University Archaeological Program Prehistoric Records No. 2. Evanston.Google Scholar
Sackett, J. 1982 Approaches to Style in Lithic Archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1 : 59112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellards, E., Evans, G., and Meade, G. 1947 Fossil Bison and Associated Artifacts from Plainview, Texas. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 58 : 927954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shott, M. 1986 Technological Organization and Settlement Mobility : An Ethnographic Examination. Journal of Anthropological Research 42 : 1551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spanne, L. 1974 Seasonal Variability in the Population of Barbareno Chumash Villages : An Explanatory Model. In Papers on the Chumash, pp. 6387. Occasional Paper No. 9. San Luis Obispo County Archaeological Society, San Luis Obispo, California.Google Scholar
Stahle, D., and Dunn, J. 1982 An Analysis and Application of the Size Distribution of Waste Flakes from the Manufacture of Bifacial Stone Tools. World Archaeology 14 : 2236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, D. H. 1983a The Archaeology of Monitor Valley, 1 : Epistemology. Anthropological Papers No. 58, Pt. 1. American Museum of Natural History, New York.Google Scholar
Thomas, D. H. 1983b The Archaeology of Monitor Valley, 2 : Gatecliff Shelter. Anthropological Papers No. 59, Pt. 1. American Museum of Natural History, New York.Google Scholar
Torrence, R. 1983 Time-Budgeting and Hunter-Gatherer Technology. In Prehistoric Hunters and Gatherers in Europe, edited by Bailey, G., pp. 1122. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Torrence, R. 1989 Time, Energy, and Stone Tools. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Woodman, C, Rudolph, J., and Rudolph, T. (editors) 1990 Analysis and Synthesis. Prehistoric Resource Use and Settlement in the Santa Ynez River Basin, vol. 1. Science Applications International Corporation, Santa Barbara, California.Google Scholar
Vaughan, P. 1985 Use-Wear Analysis of Flaked Stone Tools. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
94
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Technological Organization and Hunter-Gatherer Land Use: A California Example
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Technological Organization and Hunter-Gatherer Land Use: A California Example
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Technological Organization and Hunter-Gatherer Land Use: A California Example
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *