Skip to main content Accessibility help

Archaeology as Anthropology

  • Lewis R. Binford (a1)


It is argued that archaeology has made few contributions to the general field of anthropology with regard to explaining cultural similarities and differences. One major factor contributing to this lack is asserted to be the tendency to treat artifacts as equal and comparable traits which can be explained within a single model of culture change and modification. It is suggested that “material culture” can and does represent the structure of the total cultural system, and that explanations of differences and similarities between certain classes of material culture are inappropriate and inadequate as explanations for such observations within other classes of items. Similarly, change in the total cultural system must be viewed in an adaptive context both social and environmental, not whimsically viewed as the result of “influences,” “stimuli,” or even “migrations” between and among geographically defined units.

Three major functional sub-classes of material culture are discussed: technomic, socio-technic, and ideo-technic, as well as stylistic formal properties which cross-cut these categories. In general terms these recognized classes of materials are discussed with regard to the processes of change within each class.

Using the above distinctions in what is termed a systemic approach, the problem of the appearance and changing utilization of native copper in eastern North America is discussed. Hypotheses resulting from the application of the systemic approach are: (1) the initial appearance of native copper implements is in the context of the production of socio-technic items; (2) the increased production of socio-technic items in the late Archaic period is related to an increase in population following the shift to the exploitation of aquatic resources roughly coincident with the Nipissing high water stage of the ancestral Great Lakes; (3) this correlation is explicable in the increased selective pressures favoring material means of status communication once populations had increased to the point that personal recognition was no longer a workable basis for differential role behavior; (4) the general shift in later periods from formally “utilitarian” items to the manufacture of formally “nonutilitarian” items of copper is explicable in the postulated shift from purely egalitarian to increasingly nonegalitarian means of status attainment.



Hide All
Beals, Ralph L. and Hoijer, Harry 1953 An Introduction to Anthropology. The Maemillan Company, New York.
Buettner-Janusch, John 1957 Boas and Mason: Particularism versus Generalization. American Anthropologist, Vol. 59, No. 2, pp. 318–24. Menasha.
Cushing, F. H. 1894 Primitive Copper Working: An Experimental Study. American Anthropologist, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 93117. Washington.
Fried, Morton H. 1960 On the Evolution of Social Stratification and the State. In “Culture in History: Essays in Honor of Paul Radin, edited by Diamond, Stanley, pp. 713–31. Columbia University Press, New York.
Griffin, James B. 1952 Culture Periods in Eastern United States Archaeology. In Archaeology of Eastern United States, edited by Griffin, James B., pp. 352–64. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Griffin, James B. 1960 Climatic Change: A Contributory Cause of the Growth and Decline of Northern Hopewellian Culture. Wisconsin Archeologist, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 2133. Milwaukee.
Holmes, William H. 1901 Aboriginal Copper Mines of Isle Royale, Lake Superior. American Anthropologist, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 684–96. New York.
Kroeber, A. L. 1953 Introduction. In: Anthropology Today, edited by Kroeber, A. L., pp. xiiixv. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Martin, Paul S., Quimby, George I. and Collier, Donald 1947 Indians Before Columbus. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Ritchie, William A. 1955 Recent Suggestions Suggesting an Early Woodland Burial Cult in the Northeast. New York State Museum and Science Service, Circular No. 40. Rochester.
Sahlins, Marshall D. 1958 Social Stratification in Polynesia. University of Washington Press, Seattle.
Spaulding, Albert C. 1946 Northeastern Archaeology and General Trends in the Northern Forest Zone. In “Man in Northeastern North America,” edited by Johnson, Frederick. Papers of the Robert S. Peabody Foundation for Archaeology, Vol. 3, pp. 143–67. Phillips Academy, Andover.
Steward, Julian H. 1955 Theory of Culture Change. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
Thompson, Raymond H. 1958 Preface. In “Migrations in New World Culture History,” edited by Thompson, Raymond H., pp. v—vii. University of Arizona, Social Science Bulletin, No. 27. Tucson.
Waring, Antonio J. and Holder, Preston 1945 A Prehistoric Ceremonial Complex in the Southeastern United States. American Anthropologist, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 134. Menasha.
White, Leslie A. 1959 The Evolution of Culture. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
Willey, Gordon R. and Phillips, Philip 1958 Method and Theory in Archaeology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Wittry, Warren L. 1951 A Preliminary Study of the Old Copper Complex. Wisconsin Archeologist, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 118. Milwaukee.
Wittry, Warren L. and Ritzenthaler, Robert E. 1956 The Old Copper Complex: An Archaic Manifestation in Wisconsin. American Antiquity, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 244–54. Salt Lake City.

Archaeology as Anthropology

  • Lewis R. Binford (a1)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.