Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T21:37:50.637Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

History and Archaeological Theory: Walter Taylor Revisited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

James Deetz
James Deetz*
Affiliation:
Lowie Museum of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

After nearly four decades, Taylor's discussion of the relation between history and anthropology remain remarkably fresh and are used throughout this presentation. History and anthropology have similar concerns for understanding the human experience and process; the primary concern of anthropology, however, is culture. By examining the semantic domain of both fields, their relation is clarified. The primary data base of historiography, ethnography, and archaeology consists of documents, ethnography, and material remains, respectively. Historiography, ethnography, and archaeology are methods, and no more. Theoretical considerations reside at the higher level of ethnology-the comparative study of culture.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , January 1988 , pp. 13 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Becker, C. 1932 Everyman His Own Historian. American Historical Review 37 : 221–236.Google Scholar
Binford, L. 1972 An Archaeological Perspective. Seminar Press, New York.Google Scholar
Carroll, L. 1973 Through the Looking Glass and What Alice Found There. Clarkson N. Potter, New York.Google Scholar
Connelly, T. 1977 The Marble Man. Louisiana State University Press, Baton Rouge.Google Scholar
Deetz, J. 1977 In Small Things Forgotten. Anchor Books, Doubleday, Garden City, New York.Google Scholar
Deetz, J. 1983 Scientific Humanism and Humanistic Science : A Plea for Paradigmatic Pluralism in Historical Archaeology. Geoscience and Man 23 : 27–34.Google Scholar
Flint, R. 1893 Historical Philosophy in France and French Belgium and Switzerland. London.Google Scholar
Freeman, D. S. 1934-1935 Robert E. Lee. Scribners, New York.Google Scholar
Glassie, H. 1975 Folk Housing in Middle Virginia. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.Google Scholar
Glassie, H. 1982 Passing the Time in Ballymenone. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. 1935 History and Science in Anthropology. American Anthropologist 35 : 539–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leone, M. 1972 Issues in Anthropological Archaeology. In Contemporary Archaeology : A Guide to Theory and Contributions, edited by Leone, M., pp. 14–27. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Noel Hume, I. 1983 Martin's Hundred. Alfred Knopf, New York.Google Scholar
Parkington, J., and Smith, A. 1986 Guest Editorial. The South African Archaeological Bulletin 41 : 43–44.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. 1929 The Status of Linguistics as a Science. Language 5 : 207–214.Google Scholar
Taylor, W. W. 1948 A Study of Archeology. American Anthropologist, Memoir 69. Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Taylor, W. W. 1972 Old Wine and New Skins : A Contemporary Parable. In Contemporary Archaeology : A Guide to Theory and Contributions, edited by Leone, M., pp. 28–33. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Taylor, W. W. 1983 A Study of Archeology. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Von Daniken, E. 1985 Chariots of the Gods. Bern Porter.Google Scholar
Whorf, B. 1940 Science and Linguistics. The Technology Review 42 : 231.Google Scholar
Wylie, A. 1985 Putting Shakertown Back Together : Critical Theory in Archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 4 : 133–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar