Skip to main content
×
Home

A framework for evaluating the sustainability of agricultural production systems

  • C. O. Stockle (a1), R.I. Papendick (a2), K.E. Saxton (a2), G.S. Campbell (a3) and F.K. van Evert (a3)...
Abstract
Abstract

Sustainable agriculture has gained acceptance as a conceptual approach for shaping farming systems of the future. All definitions of sustainable agriculture include food productivity, food safety, resource protection, quality of life and environmental quality. However, the sustainability of a wide range of farming systems has been judged only subjectively. Currently there are no scientific criteria to evaluate the sustainability of a specific farming system. We propose a framework for evaluating the relative sustainability of a farming system using nine attributes: profitability, productivity, soil quality, water quality, air quality, energy efficiency, fish and wildlife habitat, quality of life, and social acceptance. Each attribute is scored and then weighted in a way that is subjective and dependent on the judgment of the evaluating team, but that must be expressed numerically. The scoring must be based on quantifiable constraints within each attribute. Constraints can be quantified by direct measurement, which is already true for those related to profitability, productivity, water quality and energy efficiency. Constraints that are not readily measurable will need other evaluation techniques, including expert opinion and computer simulation models.

Copyright
References
Hide All
1.Anderson M.D., and Lockeretz W.. 1992. Sustainable agriculture research in the ideal and in the field. J. Soil and Water Conservation 47:100104.
2.Dunlap R.E., Beus C.E., Howell R.E., and Waud J.. 1992. What is sustainable agriculture? An empirical examination of faculty and farmer definitions. J. Sustainable Agric. 3:539.
3.Flora C.B. 1992. Building sustainable agriculture: A new application of farming systems research and extension. J. Sustainable Agric. 2:3749.
4.National Research Council. 1989. Alternative Agriculture. Board on Agriculture. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
5.Neher D. 1992. Ecological sustainability in agricultural systems: Definition and measurement. J. Sustainable Agric. 2:5161.
6.Parr J.F., Stewart B.A., Hornick S.B., and Singh R.P.. 1990. Improving the sustainability of dryland farming systems: A global perspective. In Singh R.P., Parr J.F., and Stewart B.A. (eds). Advances in Soil Science, Vol. 13. Dryland Agriculture: Strategies for Sustainability. Springer-Verlag, New York, N.Y.
7.Schaller N. 1990. Mainstreaming lowinput agriculture. J. Soil and Water Conservation 45:912.
8.Senanayake R. 1991. Sustainable agriculture: Definitions and parameters for measurement. J. Sustainable Agric. 1:728.
9.Taylor D.C. 1990. On-farm sustainable agriculture research: Lessons from the past, directions for the future. J. Sustainable Agric. 1:4387.
10.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1992. EMAP Monitor. Newsletter, March. Office of Research and Development. Washington, D.C.
11.van Evert F.K. 1992. Modeling agricultural systems with Cropsyst. Ph.D. dissertation. Crop and Soil Science Dept., Washington State Univ., Pullman.
12.Youngs G.A., Goreham G.A., and Watt D.L.. 1991. Classifying conventional and sustainable farmers: Does it matter how you measure? J. Sustainable Agric. 2:91115.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Journal of Alternative Agriculture
  • ISSN: 0889-1893
  • EISSN: 1478-5498
  • URL: /core/journals/american-journal-of-alternative-agriculture
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 47 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 347 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 14th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.