Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T12:39:15.269Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reduced-input agricultural systems: Rationale and prospects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 November 2009

Frederick H. Buttel ,
Gilbert W. Gillespie Jr ,
Rhonda Janke ,
Brian Caldwell  and
Marianne Sarrantonio
Frederick H. Buttel
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Rural Sociology;
Gilbert W. Gillespie Jr
Affiliation:
Graduate students, Department of Sociology, Department of Agronomy, Department of Floriculture and Ornamental Horticulture, and Department of Agronomy, respectively, Cornell University.
Rhonda Janke
Affiliation:
Graduate students, Department of Sociology, Department of Agronomy, Department of Floriculture and Ornamental Horticulture, and Department of Agronomy, respectively, Cornell University.
Brian Caldwell
Affiliation:
Graduate students, Department of Sociology, Department of Agronomy, Department of Floriculture and Ornamental Horticulture, and Department of Agronomy, respectively, Cornell University.
Marianne Sarrantonio
Affiliation:
Graduate students, Department of Sociology, Department of Agronomy, Department of Floriculture and Ornamental Horticulture, and Department of Agronomy, respectively, Cornell University.
Get access

Abstract

In many respects the long standing and vigorous debates over alternative agriculture and organic farming are becoming less strident and less polarized. However, despite the mounting evidence that key elements of both the conventional and alternative agricultural communities are beginning to “build bridges” to each other, and to establish formal institutional programs and arrangements for improved communication and program development, important differences continue to separate the proponents and opponents of alternative agriculture. In part, these lingering differences result from the lack of adequate and reliable data, misinformation, and faulty data analyses. In order to clarify those issues which continue to divide the critics and advocates of alternative agriculture, this reappraisal of the debate begins with a methodological critique of comparison studies of conventional and organic farms. Also included is an assessment of fertilizer and pesticide use in American agriculture, the environmental impacts of conventional and reduced-input systems, the relationship between alternative agriculture and efforts to save the family farmer, and the prospects for increased public sector research on reduced-input farming systems.

Type
Articles
Information
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , Spring 1986 , pp. 58 - 64
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Aldrich, S. R. 1980. Nitrogen in relation to food, environment, and energy. Special Publ. No. 61. Illinois Agricultural Exper. Sta., Urbana, IL.Google Scholar
2.Batie, S. S. 1983. Soil Erosion. The Conservation Foundation. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
3.Berardi, G. M. 1978. Organic and conventional wheat production: Examination of energy and economics. Agro-ecosystems 4:367–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Buttel, F. H. 1984. Socioeconomic equity and environmental quality in North American agriculture: Alternative trajectories for future development, p,. 89–106. In: Douglass, G. K. (ed.) Agriculture Sustainability in a Changing World Order. Westview Press., Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
5.Buttel, F. H. and Gertler, M. E.. 1982. Agricultural structure, agricultural policy, and environmental quality: Some observations on the context of agricultural research in North America. Agriculture and Environment 7:101–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Buttel, F. H., Gillespie, G. W. Jr., Larson, O. W. III, and Harris, C. K.. 1981. The social bases of agrarian environmentalism: A Comparative analysis of Michigan and New York farm operators. Rural Sociology 46:391–410.Google Scholar
7.Buttel, F. H., Kenney, M., Kloppenburg, J. Jr., and Smith, D.. 1986. Industry-university relationships and the land-grant system. Agricultural Administration 17: (In press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Buttel, F. H. and Murdock, S. H.. 1986. Developments in rural environments. In: Zube, E. H. and Moore, G. H. (eds.) Advances in Environment, Behavior, and Design. Plenum, NY.Google Scholar
9.Buttel, F. H. and Youngberg, I. G.. 1985. Sustainable agricultural research and technology transfer: Sociopolitical opportunities and constraints, pp. 287–297. In: Edens, T. C. et al. (eds.) Sustainable Agriculture and Integrated Farming Systems. Michigan State Univ. Press, East Lansing, MI.Google Scholar
10.Clark, E. H. II, Haverkamp, J. A., and Chapman, W.. 1985. Eroding Soils: The Off-Farm Impacts. The Conservation Foundation, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
11.Council for Agricultural Science and Technology (CAST). 1980. Organic and Conventional Farming Compared. CAST, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
12.Crosson, P. R. and Brubaker, S.. 1982. Resource and Environmental Effects of U. S. Agriculture. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
13.Dalecki, M. G. and Bealer, R. C.. 1984. Who is the “organic” farmer?“ The Rural Sociologist 4:11–18.Google Scholar
14.Douglass, G. K. 1985. When is agriculture “sustainable”? pp. 10–21. In: Edens, T. C. et al. (eds.) Sustainable Agriculture and Integrated Farming Systems. Michigan State Univ. Press, East Lansing, MI.Google Scholar
15.Dovring, F. and Yanagida, J. F.. 1979. Monoculture and Productivity: A Study of Private Profit and Social Product on Grain Farms and Livestock Farms in Illinois. AE-4477. Dept. of Agric. Economics, Illinois Agric. Exper. Station, Urbana, IL.Google Scholar
16.Edens, T. C. 1985. Toward a sustainable agriculture, pp. 2–5. In: Edens, T. C. et al. (eds.), Sustainable Agriculture and Integrated Farming Systems, Michigan State Univ. Press, East Lansing, MI.Google Scholar
17.Frederick, K. D. 1980. Irrigation and the future of American agriculture, pp. 157–190. In: Douglass, G. K. (ed.), Agricultural Sustainability in a Changing World Order. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
18.Harris, C. K., Powers, S. E., and Buttel, F. H.. 1980. Myth and reality in organic farming: A profile of conventional and organic farmers in Michigan. Rural Sociological Society Newsline 8:33–43.Google Scholar
19.Harwood, R. R. 1984. Organic farming research at the Rodale Research Center. Chapter 1. In: Bezdicek, D. F. et al. (eds.) Organic Farming: Current Technology and its Role in Sustainable Agriculture. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
20.Harwood, R. R. 1985. The integration efficiencies of cropping systems, pp. 64–75. In: Edens, T. C. et al. (eds.) Sustainable Agriculture and Integrated Farming Systems. Michigan State Univ. Press, East Lansing, MI.Google Scholar
21.Jackson, W. and Bender, M.. 1984. An alternative to till agriculture as a dominant means of food production, pp. 27–45. In: Busch, L. and Lacy, W. B. (eds.) Food Security in the United States. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
22.Klepper, R., Lockeretz, W., Commoner, B., Gertler, M., Fast, S., O'Leary, D., and Blobaum, R.. 1977. Economic performance and energy intensiveness of organic and conventional farms in the corn belt: A preliminary comparison. American J. Agricultural Economics 59:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Knutson, R. D. 1984. Restructuring policy for agriculture: A discussion, pp. 127–142. In: Batie, S. S. and Marshall, J. P. (eds.) Restructuring Policy for Agriculture. Information Series 84–2. College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.Google Scholar
24.Larson, W. E., Pierce, F. J., and Dowdy, R. H.. 1984. Our agricultural resources: Management for conservation, pp. 40–59. In: English, B. C. et al. (eds.) Future Agricultural Technology and Resource Conservation. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
25.LeVeen, E. P. 1978. The prospects for small-scale farming in an industrial society: A critical appraisal of Small is Beautiful, pp. 106–125. In: Dorf, R. C. and Hunter, Y. L. (eds.) Appropriate Visions. Boyd and Fraser, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
26.Lockeretz, W. 1985. U.S. organic farming: What we can and cannot learn from on-farm research, pp. 96–104. In: Edens, T. C. et al. (eds.) Sustainable Agriculture and Integrated Farming Systems. Michigan Site Univ. Press, East Lansing, MI.Google Scholar
27.Lockeretz, W. and Wernick, S.. 1980. Commercial organic farming in the corn belt in comparison to conventional practices. Rural Sociology 45:708–722.Google Scholar
28.Lockeretz, W., Shearer, G., and Kohl, D. H.. 1981. Organic farming in the corn belt. Science 211:540–547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Lockeretz, W., Shearer, G., Kohl, D. H., and Klepper, R. W.. 1984. Comparison of organic and conventional farming in the corn belt. pp. 37–48. In: Bezdicek, D. F. et al. (eds.) Organic Farming: Current Technology and its Role in a Sustainable Agriculture. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
30.Lowrance, R., Stinner, B. R., and House, G. J. (eds.). 1984. Agricultural Ecosystems. Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY.Google Scholar
31.Oelhaf, R. C. 1978. Organic Agriculture. Allanheld, Osmun & Co., Monclair, NJ.Google Scholar
32.Office of Technology Assessment (OTA). 1985. Technology, Public Policy, and the Changing Structure of American Agriculture: A Special Report for the 1985 Farm Bill. OTA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
33.Olsen, K. D., Langley, J., and Heady, E. O.. 1982. Widespread adoption of organic farming practices: Estimated impacts on U.S. agriculture. J. Soil and Water Conserv. 37:41–45.Google Scholar
34.Pimentel, D., Berardi, G. M., and Fast, S.. 1983. Energy efficiency of farming systems: Organic and conventional agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 9:359–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35.Pimentel, D., Berardi, G. M., and Fast, S.. 1984. Energy efficiencies of farming wheat, corn, and potatoes organically, pp. 151–161. In: Bezdicek, D. F. et al. (eds.) Organic Farming: Current Technology and its Role in a Sustainable Agriculture. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
36.Raup, P. M. 1980. Competition for land and the future of American agriculture, pp. 41–77. In: Batie, S. S. and Healy, R. G. (eds.) The Future of American Agriculture as a Strategic Resource. The Conservation Foundation, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
37.Shearer, G., Kohl, D. H., Wanner, D., Kuepper, G., Sweeney, S., and Lockeretz, W.. 1981. Crop production costs and returns on midwestern organic farms: 1977 and 1978. American J. Agricultural Economics 63:264–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38.U. S. Department of Agriculture. 1980. Report and recommendations on organic farming. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
39.Youngberg, I. G. 1984. Alternative agriculture in the United States: Ideology, politics, and prospects, pp. 107–135. In: Knorr, D. F. and Watkins, R. R. (eds.) Alterations in Food Production. Van Nostrand, New York, NY.Google Scholar
40.Youngberg, I. G. and Buttel, F. H.. 1984a. Public policy and socio-political factors affecting the future of sustainable farming systems, pp. 167–185. In: Bezdicek, D. F. et al. (eds.) Organic Farming: Current Technology and its Role in a Sustainable Agriculture. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
41.Youngberg, I. G. and Buttel, F. H.. 1984b. U. S. agriculture policy and alternative farming systems: Politics and prospects, pp. 45–66. In: Batie, S. S. and Marshall, J. P. (eds.) Restructuring Policy for Agriculture. Information Series 84–2. College of Agric, and Life Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.Google Scholar