Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T03:23:11.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Interpretation of Acts and Rules in Public International Law. By Alexander Orakhelashvili. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2008. Pp. xxviii, 594. Index. $143.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Ian Johnstone
Ian Johnstone*
Affiliation:
Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Recent Books on International Law
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 106 , Issue 1 , January 2012 , pp. 210 - 215
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Dworkin, Ronald, Law as Interpretation, 60 Tex. L. Rev. 527 (1982)Google Scholar; Ronald Dworkin, Law’s Empire 49-50, 86-92 (1986).

2 Stanley Fish, Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies (1989).

3 The principal works on which Orakhelashvili draws are Hersch Lauterpacht, the Function of Law in the International Community (1933), Hersch Lauterpacht, the Development of International Law by the International Court (1958), J. L. Brierly, the Law of Nations (1949), and J. L. Brierly, the Basis of Obligation in International Law (1958).

4 Law’s Empire, supra note 1, at 256.

5 Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-Binding Norms in the International Legal System (Dinah Shelton ed., 2000); Legalization and World Politics ( Goldstein, Judith L., Kahler, Miles, Keohane, Robert O. & Slaughter, Anne-Marie eds., 2001)Google Scholar.

6 [Editor’s note: Brunnée and Toope’s recent book, Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account, is reviewed by Nico Krisch in this issue of the Journals

7 On page 321, Orakhelashvili cites to Johnstone, Ian, Treaty Interpretation: The Authority of Interpretive Communities, 12 Mich. J. Int’l L. 371 (1991)Google Scholar. I have expanded on the idea of interpretive communities in Security Council Deliberations: The Power of the Better Argument, 14 Eur. J. Int’l L. 437 (2003), and most recently, the Power of Deliberation: International Law, Politics and Organizations (2011).

8 Jürgen Habermas, Between Fact and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (William Rehg trans., 1996).

9 See Power of Deliberation, supra note 7, especially chapters 3 and 6.

10 SC Res. 678 (Nov. 29, 1990).

11 SC Res. 687 (Apr. 3,1991).

12 SC Res. 1441 (Nov. 8, 2002).

13 Similarly, his analysis of the Security Council’s determination of what counts as a “threat to the peace” within the meaning of Article 39 of the UN Charter leaves much to be desired (p. 542). He appeals for “objective or objectivised criteria” (p. 541) for making that determination, guided by the test of “reality and genuineness” (p. 547). Does that test really get us any closer to “objective” interpretation of what “threat to peace” means? Who applies the test, and how?