Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T19:00:14.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: Less Is More

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Judith Hippler Bello
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial Comment
Information
American Journal of International Law , Volume 90 , Issue 3 , July 1996 , pp. 416 - 418
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1996

References

1 See generally Stephen P. Croley & John H.Jackson, WTO Dispute Procedures, Standard of Review, and Deference to National Governments, 90 AJIL 193 (1996).

2 Until recently, polls showed broad support for trade liberalization. E.g., Chicago Council on Foreign Relations, American Public Opinion and U.S. Foreign Policy 1995, at 28–30 (1995). Some recent polls, however, show a significant decline in such support. E.g., EPIC-MRA/Mitchell poll, reported in J. Com., Nov. 14, 1995, at 1A, 8A; Peter Hart Research poll, reported in Daily Rep. for Executives (BNA), Mar. 25, 1996, at A–11. For a thoughtful analysis of the reasons for this decline, see Marc Levinson, Kantor’s Cant, Foreign Aff., Mar.–Apr. 1996, at 2.