Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5c569c448b-ph4cd Total loading time: 2.039 Render date: 2022-07-05T09:18:09.169Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true
  • English
American Political Science Review American Political Science Review

Article contents

Authoritarian Reversals and Democratic Consolidation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2008

MILAN SVOLIK
MILAN SVOLIK*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign
*
Milan Svolik is Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign. Address: 361 Lincoln Hall, 702 South Wright Street, Urbana IL 61801 (msvolik@uiuc.edu).
Get access Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I present a new empirical approach to the study of democratic consolidation. This approach leads to new insights into the determinants of democratic consolidation that cannot be obtained with existing techniques. I distinguish between democracies that survive because they are consolidated and those democracies that are not consolidated but survive because of some favorable circumstances. As a result, I can identify the determinants of two related yet distinct processes: the likelihood that a democracy consolidates, and the timing of authoritarian reversals in democracies that are not consolidated. I find that the level of economic development, type of democratic executive, and type of authoritarian past determine whether a democracy consolidates, but have no effect on the timing of reversals in democracies that are not consolidated. That risk is only associated with economic recessions. I also find that existing studies greatly underestimate the risk of early reversals while simultaneously overestimating the risk of late reversals, and that a large number of existing democracies are in fact consolidated.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 102 , Issue 2 , May 2008 , pp. 153 - 168
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James A.. 2005. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Akaike, Hirotugu. 1974. “A new look at the statistical model identification.” IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control 19 (December): 716–23.Google Scholar
Beck, Thorsten, Clarke, George, Groff, Alberto, Keefer, Philip, and Walsh, Patrick. 2001. “New tools in comparative political economy: The Database of Political Institutions.” World Bank Economic Review 15 (September): 165–76.Google Scholar
Bernhard, Michael, Nordstrom, Timothy, and Reenock, Christopher. 2001. “Economic Performance, Institutional Intermediation, and Democratic Survival.” Journal of Politics 63 (August): 775–803.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles. 2003. Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles, and Rosato, Sebastian. 2001. “A complete dataset of political regimes, 1800–1999.”Google Scholar
Boix, Carles, and Stokes, Susan C.. 2003. “Endogenous Democratization.” World Politics 55 (July): 517–49.Google Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Jones, Bradford S.. 2004. Event History Modeling. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Radcliffe, Peter M., and Bartels, Brandon L.. 2005. “The Incidence and Timing of PAC Contributions to Incumbent U.S. House Members, 1993–94.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 30 (November): 549–79.Google Scholar
Cheibub, José Antonio. 2007. Presidentialism, parliamentarism, and democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cheibub, José Antonio, and Gandhi, Jennifer. 2005. “Classifying Political Regimes: A Six-Fold Measure of Democracies and Dictatorships.”Google Scholar
Cohn, Samuel K. Jr., 2002. “The Black Death: End of a Paradigm.” The American Historical Review 107 (3): 703–38.Google Scholar
Correlates of War Project. 2005. “State System Membership List.”Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry. 1999. Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Diehl, Paul F., and Goertz, Gary. 2000. War and Peace in International Rivalry. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Douglas, Stratford. 1998. “The duration of the smoking habit.” Economic Inquiry 36 (January): 49–64.Google Scholar
Elkins, Zachary. 2000. “Gradations of Democracy? Empirical Tests of Alternative Conceptualizations.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (April): 293–300.Google Scholar
Epstein, David L., Bates, Robert, Goldstone, Jack, Kristensen, Ida, and O'Halloran, Sharyn. 2006. “Democratic Transitions.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (July): 551–69.Google Scholar
Farewell, Vernon T. 1977. “A Model for a Binary Variable with Time-Censored Observations.” Biometrika 64 (l): 43–46.Google Scholar
Findley, Michael G., and Teo, Tze Kwang. 2006. “Rethinking Third-Party Interventions into Civil Wars: An Actor-Centric Approach.” Journal of Politics 68 (November): 828–37.Google Scholar
Fish, M. Steven. 2002. “Islam and Authoritarianism.” World Politics 55 (October): 4–37.Google Scholar
Forster, Martin, and Jones, Andrew M.. 2001. “The Role of Tobacco Taxes in Starting and Quitting Smoking: Duration Analysis of British Data.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 164: 517–47.Google Scholar
Fortna, Virginia Page. 2004. Peace Time: Cease-Fire Agreements and the Durability of Peace. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gasiorowski, Mark J. 1995. “Economic Crisis and Political Regime Change: An Event History Analysis.” American Political Science Review 89 (December): 882–97.Google Scholar
Gasiorowski, Mark J., and Power, Timothy J.. 1998. “The structural determinants of democratic consolidation: Evidence from the Third World.” Comparative Political Studies 31 (December): 740–71.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert R.. 1995. The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Heckman, James J., and Singer, Burton. 1984. “A Method for Minimizing the Impact of Distributional Assumptions in Econometric Models for Duration Data.” Econometrica 52 (March): 615–23.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Demoratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, Joseph G., Chen, Ming-Hui, and Sinha, Debajyoti. 2001. Bayesian Survival Analysis. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
La, Porta, Florencio, RafaelSilanes, Lopez de, Shleifer, Andrei, and Vishny, Robert. 1999. “The Quality of Government.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 15 (April): 222–79.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J. 1994. “Presidential of parliamentary democracy: Does it make a difference?” In ed. Linz, Juan J. and Valenzuela, Arturo. The Failure of Presidential Democracy, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 3–87.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J., and Stepan, Alfred. 1996. Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and post-communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Londregan, John B., and Poole, Keith T.. 1996. “Does high income promote democracy?” World Politics 49 (October): l–30.Google Scholar
Maddison, Angus. 2003. The World Economy: Historical Statistics. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 1997. Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maller, Ross A., and Zhou, Xian. 1995. “Testing for the Presence of Immune or Cured Individuals in Censored Survival Data.” Biometrics 51 (December): 1197–1205.Google Scholar
Maller, Ross A., and Zhou, Xian. 1996. Survival analysis with long-term survivors. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Marshall, Monty G., and Jaggers, Keith. 2003. “Polity IV: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2003.”Google Scholar
McCullagh, Peter, and Nelder, John A.. 1983. Generalized linear models. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
McLachlan, Geoffrey, and Peel, David. 2000. Finite Mixture Models. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Milner, Helen, and Kubota, Keiko. 2005. “Why the Move to Free Trade? Democracy and Trade Policy in the Developing Countries.” International Organization 59 (Winter): 157–93.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1996. “Illusions about consolidation.” Journal of Democracy 7 (April): 34–51.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo, and Schmitter, Philippe C.. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Comparative Perspective, vol. 4. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1982. The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Pevehouse, Jon C. 2002. “Democracy from the Outside-In? International Organizations and Democratization.” International Organization 56 (Summer): 515–49.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael E., Cheibub, Jose Antonio, and Limongi, Fernando. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Limongi, Fernando. 1997. “Modernization: Theories and facts.” World Politics 49 (January): 155–83.Google Scholar
Ross, Michael. 2001. “Does Oil Hinder Democracy?” World Politics 53 (April): 325–61.Google Scholar
Rustow, Dankwart A. 1970. “Transitions to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model.” Comparative Politics 2 (April): 337–63.Google Scholar
Schedler, Andreas. 1998. “What is Democratic Consolidation?” Journal of Democracy 9 (April): 91–107.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Peter, and Witte, Ann Dryden. 1989. “Predicting Criminal Recidivism Using ‘Split Population’ Survival Time Models.” Journal of Econometrics 40 (January): 141–59.Google Scholar
Svolik, Milan, and Akcinaroglu, Seden. 2006. “Government Change in Authoritarian Regimes.”Google Scholar
Tsodikov, A. D., Ibrahim, J. G., and Yakovlev, A. Y.. 2003. “Estimating Cure Rates From Survival Data: An Alternative to Two-Component Mixture Models.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 98 (464): 1063–78.Google Scholar
Vanhanen, Tatu. 2003. Democratization and Power Resources 1850–2000. Tampere: Finnish Social Science Data Archive.Google Scholar
Weingast, Barry R. 1997. “The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law.” American Political Science Review 91 (June): 245–63.Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, Kazuo. 1992. “Accelerated Failure-time Regression Models with a Regression Model of Surviving Fraction: An Application to the Analysis of ‘Permanent Unemployment’ in Japan.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 87 (June): 284–92.Google Scholar
165
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Authoritarian Reversals and Democratic Consolidation
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Authoritarian Reversals and Democratic Consolidation
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Authoritarian Reversals and Democratic Consolidation
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *