Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-ggg9q Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-06-11T02:18:14.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

News and Geolocated Social Media Accurately Measure Protest Size Variation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2020

ANTON SOBOLEV*
Affiliation:
Yale University
M. KEITH CHEN*
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
JUNGSEOCK JOO*
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
ZACHARY C. STEINERT-THRELKELD*
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
*
Anton Sobolev, Postdoctoral Associate, Leitner Program on Political Economy, Yale University, anton.sobolev@yale.edu.
M. Keith Chen, Professor, Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, keith.chen@anderson.ucla.edu.
Jungseock Joo, Assistant Professor, Department of Communication, University of California, Los Angeles, jjoo@comm.ucla.edu.
Zachary C. Steinert-Threlkeld, Assistant Professor, Luskin School of Public Affairs, University of California, Los Angeles, zst@luskin.ucla.edu.

Abstract

Larger protests are more likely to lead to policy changes than small ones are, but whether or not attendance estimates provided in news or generated from social media are biased is an open question. This letter closes the question: news and geolocated social media data generate accurate estimates of protest size variation. This claim is substantiated using cellphone location data from more than 10 million individuals during the 2017 United States Women’s March protests. These cellphone estimates correlate strongly with those provided in news media as well as three size estimates generated using geolocated tweets, one text-based and two based on images. Inferences about protest attendance from these estimates match others’ findings about the Women’s March.

Information

Type
Letter
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Supplementary material: PDF

Sobolev et al. supplementary material

Sobolev et al. supplementary material

Download Sobolev et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 9.2 MB
Supplementary material: Link

Sobolev et al. Dataset

Link
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.