Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 June 2020
Larger protests are more likely to lead to policy changes than small ones are, but whether or not attendance estimates provided in news or generated from social media are biased is an open question. This letter closes the question: news and geolocated social media data generate accurate estimates of protest size variation. This claim is substantiated using cellphone location data from more than 10 million individuals during the 2017 United States Women’s March protests. These cellphone estimates correlate strongly with those provided in news media as well as three size estimates generated using geolocated tweets, one text-based and two based on images. Inferences about protest attendance from these estimates match others’ findings about the Women’s March.
We thank Pablo Barberá, Brett Carter, Benjamin A.T. Graham, Will Hobbs, Nazita Lajevardi, Natalia Lamberova, John McCarthy, Clark McPhail, Jeremy Pressman, Michael Shalev, and Thomas Zeitzoff for their valuable feedback. The editor and anonymous reviewers also provided constructive criticism. Ryan Fox Squire and Aaron Hoffman assisted with the SafeGraph data. Alexander Chan and Christina Indudhara assisted with detecting duplicate faces. This work is supported by NSF RIDIR #1831848, the UCLA Big Data Transdisciplinary Seed Grant, and a UCLA California Center for Population Research Seed Grant. All remaining errors remain inadvertently. Replication files are available at the American Political Science Review Dataverse: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/TRLSJA.
Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.