Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-cf9d5c678-h2mp8 Total loading time: 0.264 Render date: 2021-07-27T00:48:04.719Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Policy Uptake as Political Behavior: Evidence from the Affordable Care Act

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2017

AMY E. LERMAN
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
MEREDITH L. SADIN
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
SAMUEL TRACHTMAN
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley

Abstract

Partisanship is a primary predictor of attitudes toward public policy. However, we do not yet know whether party similarly plays a role in shaping public policy behavior, such as whether to apply for government benefits or take advantage of public services. While existing research has identified numerous factors that increase policy uptake, the role of politics has been almost entirely overlooked. In this paper, we examine the case of the Affordable Care Act to assess whether policy uptake is not only about information and incentives; but also about politics. Using longitudinal data, we find that Republicans have been less likely than Democrats to enroll in an insurance plan through state or federal exchanges, all else equal. Employing a large-scale field experiment, we then show that de-emphasizing the role of government (and highlighting the market's role) can close this partisan gap.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Russell Sage Foundation; the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Scholars in Health Policy Research Program; Professor Jack Citrin and the Institute of Governmental Studies at UC Berkeley; and the National Science Foundation. We are also indebted to Enroll America and the Kaiser Family Foundation for partnering with us in this research. Thanks also to Ed Coleman, John Ellwood, Ann Keller, Gabe Lenz, Neil O'Brian, and Robert Van Houweling, as well as the anonymous reviewers and editors of the APSR, for their helpful comments on early drafts of this work.

References

Aber, Lawrence J., Bennett, Neil G., Conley, Dalton C., and Li, Jiali. 1997. “The Effects of Poverty on Child Health and Development.” Annual Review of Public Health 18: 463–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aizer, Anna, and Currie, Janet. 2004. “Networks or Neighborhoods? Correlations in the Use of Publicly-funded Maternity Care in California.” Journal of Public Economics 88 (December): 2573–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Paul. 2012. “How Relevant is the Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives?” Statistical Horizons, October 8, 2012. Retrieved May 15, 2017 (https://statisticalhorizons.com/iia)Google Scholar
Alonso-Zaldivar, Ricardo. 2014. “Probe exposes flaws behind Healthcare.gov rollout.” AP News, July 31. Retrieved June 13, 2016 (http://apnews.excite.com/article/20140731/us-health-overhaul-de4c72c273.html).Google Scholar
Barsky, Robert B., Juster, F. Thomas, Kimball, Miles S., and Shapiro, Matthew D.. 1997. “Preference Parameters and Behavioral Heterogeneity: An Experimental Approach in the Health and Retirement Study.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (2): 537–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Shalom, Yonatan, Moffitt, Robert, and Schloz, John Karl. 2012. “An Assessment of the Effectiveness of Anti-Poverty Programs in the United States.” In Oxford Handbook of Economics of Poverty, ed. Jefferson, Phillip N.. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 709–49.Google Scholar
Bertrand, Marianne, Mullainathan, Sendhil, and Shafir, Eldar. 2006. “Behavioral Economics and Marketing in Aid of Decision Making among the Poor.” Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 25 (1): 823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhargava, Saurabh, and Manoli, Dayanand. 2015. “Psychological Frictions and the Incomplete Take-Up of Social Benefits: Evidence from an IRS Field Experiment.” American Economic Review 105 (November): 3489–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blank, Rebecca, and Ruggles, Patricia. 1996. “When Do Women Use AFDC & Food Stamps? The Dynamics of Eligibility vs. Participation,” Journal of Human Resources 31 (1): 5789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blavin, Fredric, Shartzer, Adele, Long, Sharon K., and Holahan, John. 2016. “Employer-Sponsored Insurance Stays Strong, with No Signs of Decay under the ACA: Findings through March 2016. Urban Institute Health Policy Center, July 13. Retrieved May 20, 2017 (http://hrms.urban.org/briefs/employer-sponsored-insurance-aca-march-2016.html).Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, E. Donald. 1960. The American Voter. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Chetty, Raj, Looney, Adam, and Kroft, Kory. 2009. “Salience and Taxation: Theory and Evidence.” American Economic Review 99:4 (September): 1145–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chetty, Raj, and Saez, Emmanuel. 2013. “Teaching the Tax Code: Earnings Responses to an Experiment with EITC Recipients.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 5:1 (January): 131.Google Scholar
Chong, Dennis. 2006. “Free Speech and Multiculturalism In and Out of the Academy.” Political Psychology 27:1 (February): 2954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chong, Dennis, and Druckman, James N.. 2007. “Framing Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 10: 103–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, Phillip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, ed. Apter, David E.. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe, 206–61.Google Scholar
Currie, Janet. 2000. “Do Children of Immigrants Make Differential Use of Public Health Insurance?” In Issues in the Economics of Immigration, ed. Borjas, George. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Currie, Janet M. 2006. “The Take-up of Social Benefits.” In Poverty, the Distribution of Income, and Public Policy, eds. Auerbach, Alan, Card, David, and Quigley, John. New York, NY: Russell Sage, 80148.Google Scholar
Currie, Janet, and Grogger, Jeffrey. 2002. “Medicaid Expansions and Welfare Contractions: Offsetting Effects on Maternal Behavior and Infant Health.” Journal of Health Economics 21:2 (March): 313–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daponte, Beth, Sanders, Seth, and Taylor, Lowell. 1999. “Why Do Low-Income Households Not Use Food Stamps? Evidence from an Experiment.” Journal of Human Resources 34:3 (Summer): 612–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericson, Keith Marzilli, and Starc, Amanda. 2012. “Heuristics and Heterogeneity in Health Insurance Exchanges: Evidence from the Massachusetts Connector.” American Economic Review 102:3 (May): 493–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P., and Abrams, Samuel J.. 2008. “Partisan Polarization in the American Public.” Annual Review of Political Science. 11 (1): 563–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores, Bill, Roe, Phil, and Scott, Austin. 2015. “A Conservative Alternative to Obamacare.” National Review, March 4. Retrieved June 22, 2016 (http://www.nationalreview.com/article/414808/conservative-alternative-obamacare-bill-flores-phil-roe-austin-scott).Google Scholar
Gamson, William A., and Modigliani, Andrew. 1987. “The Changing Culture of Affirmative Action.” In Research in Political Sociology, ed. Braungart, Richard D.. Greenwich, CT: Jai Press, 137–77.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 2000. Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Green, Donald, Palmquist, Bradley, and Schickler, Eric. 2004. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Haselswerdt, Jake, and Bartels, Brandon L.. (2015) “Public Opinion, Policy Tools, and the Status Quo Evidence from a Survey Experiment.” Political Research Quarterly 68 (3): 607–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoynes, Hilary, Schanzenbach, Diane Whitmore, and Almond, Douglas. 2016. “Long Run Impacts of Childhood Access to the Safety Net.” American Economic Review 106 (April): 903934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent, and Stoker, Laura. 2005. “Political Similarity and Influence Between Husbands and Wives.” In The Social Logic of Politics: Personal Networks as Contexts for Political Behavior, ed. Zuckerman, Alan S.. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press. 5174.Google Scholar
The Kaiser Family Foundation. 2010–2016. Kaiser Health Tracking Poll. http://www.kff.org/tag/tracking-poll/ Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Sanders, Lynn M.. 1990. “Mimicking Political Debate with Survey Questions: The Case of White Opinion on Affirmative Action for Blacks.” Social Cognition 8 (1): 73103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Sanders, Lynn M.. 1996. Divided by Color: Racial Politics and Democratic Ideals. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Regina G. 2004. “Framing Obesity: The Evolution of News Discourse on a Public Health Issue.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 9 (3): 5675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, David. 2009. “Training, Wages, and Sample Selection: Estimating Sharp Bounds on Treatment Effects.” The Review of Economic Studies 76 (3): 10711102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leip, Dave. 2017. “David Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections, Datasets.”, doi:10.7910/DVN/XX3YJ4, Harvard Dataverse, V2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenz, Gabriel. 2012. Follow the Leader? How Voters Respond to Politicians' Policies and Performance. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, Larry, Damico, Anthony, Cox, Cynthia, and Claxton, Gary. “Mapping Marketplace Enrollment.” Kaiser Family Foundation. Retrieved February 13, 2017 (http://kff.org/interactive/mapping-marketplace-enrollment/)Google Scholar
Madrian, Brigitte C., and Shea, Dennis F.. 2001. “The Power of Suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) Participation and Savings Behavior.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (4): 1149–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maloy, Simon. 2015. “This is What Ripping Holes in Obamacare Looks Like: The Horrific Human Cost of the GOPs Anti-reform Crusade.” Salon, May 13. Retrieved June 13, 2016 (http://www.salon.com/2015/05/13/this_is_what_ripping_holes_in_obamacare_looks_like_the_horrific_human_cost_of_the_gops_anti_reform_crusade/).Google Scholar
Marken, Stephanie. July 11 2016. “U.S. Uninsured Rate Remains at Historical Low of 11.0%.” Princeton NJ: Gallup. Retrieved January 26, 2017. (http://www.gallup.com/poll/193556/uninsured-rate-remains-historical-low.aspx).Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne. 2007. Soldiers to Citizens: The G.I. Bill and the Making of the Greatest Generation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne. 2011. The Submerged State: How Invisible Government Policies Undermine American Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffitt, Robert A. 1983. “An Economic Model of Welfare Stigma.” American Economic Review 73 (December): 1023–35.Google Scholar
Moffitt, Robert. 2003. “The Role of Nonfinancial Factors in Exit and Entry in the TANF Program.” The Journal of Human Resources 38: 1221–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morin, Rick, Taylor, Paul, and Patten, Eileen. 2012. “A Bipartisan Nation of Beneficiaries.” Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved June 13, 2016 (http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2012/12/18/a-bipartisan-nation-of-beneficiaries/).Google Scholar
Mullainathan, Sendhil, and Shafir, Eldar. 2013. Scarcity: The New Science of Having Less and How It Defines Our Lives. New York, NY: Picador.Google Scholar
Nelson, Thomas E., Clawson, Rosalee A., and Oxley, Zoe M.. 1997. “Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and Its Effect on Tolerance.” American Political Science Review 91 (3): 567–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Thomas E., and Kinder, Donald R.. 1996. “Issue Frames and Group-centrism in American Public Opinion.” Journal of Politics 58 (4): 1055–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newport, Frank. September 17, 2012. “Majority in U.S. Still Say Government Doing Too Much.” Princeton NJ: Gallup. Retrieved June 2016. (http://www.gallup.com/poll/157481/majority-say-government-doing.aspx ) Google Scholar
Niemi, Richard G., and Jennings, M. Kent. 1991. “Issues and Inheritance in the Formation of Party Identification.” American Journal of Political Science 35:4 (November): 970988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, Matthew C., Brossard, Dominique, and Kroepsch, Adrianne. 2003. “Framing Science: The Stem Cell Controversy in an Age of Press/Politics.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 8 (2): 3670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donoghue, Ted, and Rabin, Matthew. 1999. “Doing It Now or Later.” American Economic Review 89 (March): 103–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Office of Inspector General, Health and Human Services. 2014. “An Overview of 60 Contracts That Contributed to the Development and Operation of the Federal Marketplace.” Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved June 13, 2016 (http://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-03-14-00231.asp).Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2010. “The People and Their Government: Distrust, Discontent, Anger and Partisan Rancor.” Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved June 13, 2016 (http://www.people-press.org/files/legacy-pdf/606.pdf).Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2012. “Obama Health Care Law: Where Does the Public Stand.” Washington DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved January 25, 2017. (http://www.people-press.org/2012/06/15/obama-health-care-law-where-does-the-public-stand/)Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2015. “Beyond Distrust: How Americans View Their Government: Broad Criticism, but Positive Performance Ratings in Many Areas.” Washington DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved May 1, 2017. (http://www.people-press.org/files/2015/11/11-23-2015-Governance-release.pdf).Google Scholar
Rasinski, Kenneth A. 1989. “The Effect of Question Wording on Public Support for Government Spending.” Public Opinion Quarterly 53 (3): 388–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, Dhavan V., Watts, Mark D., Domke, David, and Fan, David P.. 2002. “News Framing and Cueing of Issue Regimes: Explaining Clinton's Public Approval in Spite of Scandal.” Public Opinion Quarterly 66 (3): 339370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smeeding, Timothy M., Phillips, Katherin Ross, and O'Connor, Michael. 2000. “The EITC: Expectation, Knowledge, Use, and Economic and Social Mobility.” National Tax Journal 53 (4): 1187–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., and Theriault, Sean M.. 2004. “The Structure of Political Argument and the Logic of Issue Framing.” In Studies in Public Opinion: Attitudes, Nonattitudes, Measurement Error, and Change, eds. Sarris, Willem E. and Sniderman, Paul M.. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 133–65.Google Scholar
Tesler, Michael. 2012. “The Spillover of Racialization into Health Care: How President Obama Polarized Public Opinion by Racial Attitudes and Race.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (3): 690704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tesler, Michael. 2015. “More Democrats are Getting Health Insurance, Thanks to Obamacare. Why are Republicans Staying Away?” The Washington Post, July 16. Retrieved June 13, 2016 (https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2015/07/16/more-democrats-are-getting-health-insurance-thanks-to-obamacare-why-are-republicans-staying-away/).Google Scholar
Weatherford, M. Stephen. 1982. “Interpersonal Networks and Political Behavior.” American Journal of Political Science 26 (1): 117–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Halbert. 1980. “A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 48 (4): 817838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The White House. 2015. “Long Term Benefits of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.” Washington, DC: The White House. Retrieved June 13, 2016 (http://www.hwcli.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/SNAP_report_final_.pdf).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2007. “Report to Congress.” Washington, DC: Health and Human Services. Retrieved June 13, 2016 (http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/indicators07/report.pdf).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2016. “Health Insurance Coverage and the Affordable Care Act, 2010–2016.” Washington, DC: Health and Human Services. Retrieved June 18, 2017. (https://aspe.hhs.gov/pdf-report/health-insurance-coverage-and-affordable-care-act-2010-2016)Google Scholar
“US Economy: The Tea Party is a Real Threat to America.” 2011. The Guardian, July 31. Retrieved June 13, 2016. (http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/jul/31/observer-editorial-us-economy).Google Scholar
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Lerman et al. Dataset

Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Lerman supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Lerman supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 2 MB
44
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Policy Uptake as Political Behavior: Evidence from the Affordable Care Act
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Policy Uptake as Political Behavior: Evidence from the Affordable Care Act
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Policy Uptake as Political Behavior: Evidence from the Affordable Care Act
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *