Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-8r8mm Total loading time: 0.332 Render date: 2021-11-27T19:00:25.013Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Regime Type, the Fate of Leaders, and War

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2010

ALEXANDRE DEBS*
Affiliation:
Yale University
H.E. GOEMANS*
Affiliation:
University of Rochester
*
Alexandre Debs is Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Yale University, Rosenkranz Hall, Room 311, PO Box 208301, New Haven, CT 06520-8301 (alexandre.debs@yale.edu).
H.E. Goemans is Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Rochester, 320 Harkness Hall, Rochester, NY 14627 (hgoemans@mail.rochester.edu).

Abstract

We propose and test a formal model of war and domestic politics, building on recent evidence on the relationship between regime type, the effect of war on the probability of losing office, and the consequences of losing office. The less the outcome of international interaction affects a leader's tenure and the less punitive are the consequences of losing office, the more a leader is willing to make concessions to strike a peaceful bargain. We demonstrate that our theory successfully predicts war involvement among nondemocratic regime types. Moreover, our theory offers an intuitive explanation for the democratic peace. Compared to nondemocratic leaders, the tenure of democratic leaders depends relatively little on the war outcome, and democratic leaders fare relatively well after losing office. Thus, democratic leaders should be more willing and able to avoid war, especially with other democrats.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James A.. 2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Babst, Dean V. 1964. “Elective Governments: A Force for Peace.” The Wisconsin Sociologist 2: 914.Google Scholar
Baliga, Sandeep, Lucca, David O., and Sjostrom, Tomas. 2007. “Domestic Political Survival and International Conflict: Is Democracy Good for Peace?” Northwestern University. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Bennett, D. Scott, and Stam, Allan C.. 2004. The Behavioral Origins of War. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Besley, Timothy, and Kudamatsu, Masayuki. 2008. “Making Autocracy Work.” In Institutions and Economic. Performance, ed. Helpman, Elhanan. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press pp. 452510.Google Scholar
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Reiter, Dan, and Zorn, Christopher J.W.. 2003. “Nonproportional Hazards and Event History Analysis in International Relations.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 47 (1): 3353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and Lalman, David. 1992. War and Reason: Domestic and International Imperatives. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Morrow, James D., Siverson, Randolph M., and Smith, Alastair. 1999. “An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace.” American Political Science Review 93 (4): 791807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Morrow, James D., Siverson, Randolph M. and Smith, Alastair. 2004. “Testing Novel Implications from the Selectorate Theory of War.” World Politics 56 (3): 363–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and Ray, James Lee. 2004. “The National Interest versus Individual Political Ambition: Democracy, Autocracy, and the Reciprocation of Force and Violence in Militarized Interstate Disputes.” In The Scourge of War: New Extensions of an Old Problem, ed. Diehl, Paul F.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 94119.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and Siverson, Randolph M.. 1995. “War and the Survival of Political Leaders: A Comparative Study of Regime Types and Political Accountability.” American Political Science Review 89 (4): 841–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Siverson, Randolph M., and Woller, Gary. 1992. “War and the Fate of Regimes: A Comparative Analysis.” American Political Science Review 86 (4): 638–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Smith, Alastair, Siverson, Randolph M., and Morrow, James D.. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cheibub, José Antonio, and Gandhi, Jennifer. 2004. “Classifying Political Regimes: A Sixfold Classification of Democracies and Dictatorships.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Chicago.Google Scholar
Chiozza, Giacomo, and Goemans, H.E.. 2004. “International Conflict and the Tenure of Leaders: Is War Still Ex Post Inefficient?American Journal of Political Science 48 (3): 604–19.Google Scholar
Debs, Alexandre. 2007 a. “Media and Divide-and-Rule.” University of Rochester. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Debs, Alexandre. 2007 b. “Political Strength and Economic Efficiency in a Multi-Agent State.” University of Rochester. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Debs, Alexandre. 2007 c. “The Wheel of Fortune: Agency Problems in Dictatorship.” University of Rochester. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Dixon, William J. 1994. “Democracy and the Peaceful Settlement of International Conflict.” American Political Science Review 88 (1): 1432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, Michael W. 1983. “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 12 (3): 205–35.Google Scholar
Egorov, Georgy, and Sonin, Konstantin. 2009. “Dictators and Their Viziers: Endogenizing the Loyalty-Competence Trade-off.” Journal of the European Economic Association [forthcoming] .Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1995. “Rationalist Explanations for War.” International Organization 49 (3): 379414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filson, Darren, and Werner, Suzanne. 2004. “Bargaining and Fighting: The Impact of Regime Type on War Onset, Duration, and Outcomes.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (2): 296313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandhi, Jennifer, and Przeworski, Adam. 2006. “Cooperation, Cooptation, and Rebellion under Dictatorships.” Economics and Politics 18 (1): 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goemans, H.E. 2008. “Which Way Out? The Manner and Consequences of Losing Office.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 53 (6): 771–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goemans, H.E., Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede, and Chiozza, Giacomo. 2009Introducing Archigos: A Data Set of Political Leaders, 1875–2003.” Journal of Peace Research. 46 (2): 269–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goemans, H.E., and Fey, Mark. 2008. “Risky but Rational: War as an Institutionally Induced Gamble.” Journal of Politics 71 (1): 3554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Crisis Behavior Project. 2007. “ICB Version 7.0 (1918–2004).” www.cidcm.umd.edu/icb/. (Accessed July 1, 2010).Google Scholar
Jackson, Matthew O., and Morelli, Massimo. 2007. “Political Bias and War.” American Economic Review 97 (4): 1353–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 2006. “Toward Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch.” In Toward Perpetual Peace and Other Writings on Politics, Peace, and History, ed. Kleingeld, Pauline. Trans. Colclasure, David L.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 67109.Google Scholar
Kuran, Timur. 1991. “Now Out of Never: The Element of Surprise in the East European Revolution of 1989.” World Politics 44 (1): 748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, Brian, and Slater, Dan. 2006. “Institutions of the Offensive: Domestic Sources of Dispute Initiation in Authoritarian Regimes.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (1): 113–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Gilat, and Razin, Ronny. 2004. “It Takes Two: An Explanation for the Democratic Peace.” Journal of the European Economic Association 2 (1): 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maoz, Zeev, and Russett, Bruce. 1993. “Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946–1986.” American Political Science Review 87 (3): 624–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myerson, Roger. 2008. “The Autocrat's Credibility Problem and Foundations of the Constitutional State.” American Political Science Review 102 (1): 125–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oneal, John R., and Russett, Bruce M.. 1997. “The Classical Liberals Were Right: Democracy, Interdependence, and Conflict, 1950–1985.” International Studies Quarterly 41 (2): 267–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padro i Miquel, Gerard. 2007. “The Control of Politicians in Divided Societies: The Politics of Fear.” Review of Economic Studies 74 (4): 1259–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patty, John, and Weber, Roberto A.. 2006. “Agreeing to Fight: An Explanation of the Democratic Peace.” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 5 (3): 305–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peceny, M., Beer, Caroline C., and Sanchez-Terry, S.. 2002. “Dictatorial Peace?American Political Science Review 96 (1): 1526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, Karl R. 1963. The Open Society and Its Enemies. Vol. I. The Spell of Plato. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Powell, Robert. 2006. “War as a Commitment Problem.” International Organization 60 (1): 169203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael E., Cheibub, José Antonio, and Limongi, Fernando. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-being in the World, 1950–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, James Lee. 1995. Democracy and International Conflict: An Evaluation of the Democratic Peace Proposition. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Reiter, Dan, and Stam, Allan C.. 2002. Democracies at War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William H. 1982. Liberalism Against Populism. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce. 1993. Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post–Cold War World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce. n.d. “Democratic Peace.” In International Encyclopedia of Peace, ed. Young, Nigel. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce, and Oneal, John R.. 2001. Triangulating Peace: Democracy, InterDependence, and International Organizations. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Schultz, Kenneth A. 2001a. Democracy and Coercive Diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, Kenneth A. 2001b. “Looking for Audience Costs.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 45 (1): 3260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1950. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. 3rd ed. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
Svolik, Milan. 2009. “Power-sharing and Leadership Dynamics in Authoritarian Regimes.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (2): 477–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weart, Spencer. 1994. “Peace among Democratic and Oligarchic Republics.” Journal of Peace Research 31 (3): 299316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weeks, Jessica. 2010. Leaders, Accountability, and Foreign Policy in Non-democracies. Diss. Stanford University, 2009. Ann Arbor: ProQuest/UMI. Publ. No. 3364479.Google Scholar
147
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Regime Type, the Fate of Leaders, and War
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Regime Type, the Fate of Leaders, and War
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Regime Type, the Fate of Leaders, and War
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *