Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T15:45:13.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Residues of a Movement: The Aging of the American Protest Generation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 1987

M. Kent Jennings*
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara University of Michigan

Abstract

The theory of political generations asserts that enduring and relevant political consequences result from critical experiences during the formative years. This study draws on a national three-wave panel study of young adults surveyed in 1965, 1973, and 1982 to test the theory with respect to the Vietnam era protest movement. College-educated protestors and nonprotestors are compared with themselves and with each other over time. Generational effects are categorized into absolute, relative, and equivalent continuity. Very strong continuities emerge for attitudes associated with the protestors' political baptism. Although erosion effects appear in more contemporary affairs, the protest generation remains quite distinctive. However, its limited size dampens the generation's political impact and qualifies the general thesis in a fashion that probably characterizes other examples of political generations also.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramson, Paul R. 1983. Political Attitudes in America. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Baker, Kendall L., Dalton, Russell, and Hildebrandt, Kai. 1981. Germany Transformed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Block, Jeanne H., Haan, Norman, and Smith, M. Brewster. 1969. Socialization Correlates of Student Activism. Journal of Social Issues 25:143–77.10.1111/j.1540-4560.1969.tb00623.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braungart, Richard G. 1984. Historical Generations and Youth Movements: A Theoretical Perspective. In Research in Social Movements, Conflict, and Change, ed. Ratcliff, Richard F.. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip. 1986. The Enduring Impact of the Vietnam War on American Public Opinion. Paper presented at the International Conference on the U.S.: A Decade after the Vietnam War, Taipei, Taiwan.Google Scholar
Cutler, Neal E., and Bengston, Vern L.. 1974. Age and Political Alienation: Maturation, Generation, and Period Effects. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 415: 160–75.10.1177/000271627441500112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael X. 1984. Politics and the Sixties: Generational, Life Cycle, and Period Effects on Electoral Behavior. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Savannah, GA.Google Scholar
Evans, Samuel, and Hildebrandt, Kai. 1979. Technical Appendix. In Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies, ed: Kaase, Max and Barnes, Samuel H.. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Feuer, Lewis S. 1969. The Conflict of Generations. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fendrich, James M. 1977. Keeping the Faith or Pursuing the Good Life: A Study in the Consequences of Participation in the Civil Rights Movement. American Sociological Review 42: 144–57.10.2307/2117736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoge, Dean R., and Ankney, Teresa L.. 1982. Occupations and Attitudes of Former Student Activists Ten Years Later. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 11:355–71.10.1007/BF01540374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holsti, Ole R., and Rosenau, James M.. 1980. Does Where You Stand Depend on When You Were Born? The Impact of Generation on Post-Vietnam Foreign Policy Beliefs. Public Opinion Quarterly 44:122.10.1086/268563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1977. The Silent Revolution in Europe: Intergenerational Change in Post-Industrial Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent. 1984. Residues of a Movement. Paper presented at the Konrad Adenauer Stiftung conference on Youth in Western Democracies, Cadenabbia, Italy.Google Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent, and Markus, Gregory B.. 1984. Partisan Orientations over the Long Haul: Results from the Three-Wave Political Socialization Panel Study. American Political Science Review 78:10001018.10.2307/1955804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent, and Niemi, Richard G.. 1981. Generations and Politics: A Panel Study of Young Adults and Their Parents. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400854264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenniston, Kenneth. 1968. Young Radicals. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Mannheim, Karl. [1928] 1972. The Problem of Generations. In The New Pilgrims, ed. Altbach, Phillip G. and Laufer, Robert S.. New York: David McKay.Google Scholar
Nassi, Alberta J. 1981. Survivors of the Sixties: Comparative Psychological and Political Development of Former Berkeley Student Activists. American Psychologist 36:753–61.10.1037/0003-066X.36.7.753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunn, Clyde Z., Crockett, Harry J. Jr., and Williams, J. Allen. 1978. Tolerance for Nonconformity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Searing, Donald, Schwartz, Joel, and Lind, Alden E.. 1973. The Structuring Principle: Political Socialization and Belief Systems. American Political Science Review 67:415–32.10.2307/1958774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, David O. 1983. On the Persistence of Early Political Predispositions: The Roles of Attitude Object and Life Stage. In Review of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 4, ed. Wheeler, Ladd and Shaver, Paul. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M. 1981. A Question of Loyalty. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Whalen, Jack, and Flacks, Richard. 1984. Echoes of Rebellion: The Liberated Generation Grows Up. Journal of Political and Military Sociology 12: 6178.Google Scholar