Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T16:23:12.869Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Speak Softly and Carry a Big Stick? Veterans in the Political Elite and the American Use of Force

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2002

Christopher Gelpi
Affiliation:
Associate Professor of Political Science, Duke University, Durham, NC 27706 (gelpi@duke.edu).
Peter D. Feaver
Affiliation:
Associate Professor of Political Science, Duke University, Durham, NC 27706 (pfeaver@duke.edu).

Abstract

Other research has shown (1) that civilians and the military differ in their views about when and how to use military force; (2) that the opinions of veterans track more closely with military officers than with civilians who never served in the military; and (3) that U.S. civil–military relations shaped Cold War policy debates. We assess whether this opinion gap “matters” for the actual conduct of American foreign policy. We examine the impact of the presence of veterans in the U.S. political elite on the propensity to initiate and escalate militarized interstate disputes between 1816 and 1992. As the percentage of veterans serving in the executive branch and the legislature increases, the probability that the United States will initiate militarized disputes declines. Once a dispute has been initiated, however, the higher the proportion of veterans, the greater the level of force the United States will use in the dispute.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2002 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.