Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-xbgml Total loading time: 0.455 Render date: 2022-08-13T00:06:56.809Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

The Transforming Power of Democracy: Regime Type and the Distribution of Electricity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

DAVID S. BROWN*
Affiliation:
University of Colorado at Boulder
AHMED MUSHFIQ MOBARAK*
Affiliation:
Yale University
*
David S. Brown is Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Colorado at Boulder, UCB 333, Boulder, CO 80309-0333 (dsbrown@colorado.edu).
Ahmed Mushfiq Mobarak is Assistant Professor of Economics, Yale School of Management, Yale University, 135 Prospect Street, Box 208200, New Haven, CT 06520-8200 (ahmed.mobarak@yale.edu).

Abstract

Theory on democracy and its consequences turns on how democracy influences behavior among politicians and the citizenry. Ultimately, the literature seeks to determine who benefits under democratic rules. This is our concern, posed in a context that allows us to address a classic question: does democracy favor large but diffuse segments of society over small but concentrated interests? We employ sectoral electricity consumption data for a panel of 733 country-years to examine democracy's impact on the distribution of electricity across three sectors that represent distinct political interests: industry, agriculture, and residential consumers. We find that in poorer countries democratization produces significant increases in the residential share of electricity relative to industry, suggesting sectors with less per capita financial clout, but a stronger voice in elections benefit under democracy. Unlike the large literatures on democracy's impact on the amounts of publicly provided goods, our results are among the first on the distribution of those goods.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J., et al. 2002. “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation.” American Economic Review 91: 1369–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achen, C. H. 2002. “Toward a New Political Methodology: Microfoundations and ART.” Annual Review of Political Science. 5: 423–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, A. and Rodrik, D.. 1994. “Distributive Politics and Economic Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 109 (2): 465–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ames, B. 1987. Political Survival: Politicians and Public Policy in Latin America. Berkeley:University of California Press.Google Scholar
Audinet, P., and Verneyre, F.. 2002. Electricity in India: Providing Power for the Millions. Paris: International Energy Agency.Google Scholar
Barnes, D. F., and Halpern, J.. 2000. “The Role of Energy Subsidies.” In Energy Services for the World's Poor, ed. World Bank. Washington, DC: World Bank, 60–8.Google Scholar
Baum, M. A., and Lake, D. A.. 2003. “The Political Economy of Growth: Democracy and Human Capital.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (2): 333–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G. S. 1983. “A Theory of Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political Influence.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 98 (3): 371400.Google Scholar
Bergara, M., Henisz, W. J., et al. 1997. “Political Institutions and Electric Uitlity Investment: A Cross-Nation Analysis.” Working Paper Series of the Program on Workable Energy Regulation. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Betancourt, R., and Gleason, S.. 2000. “The Allocation of Publicly-Provided Goods to Rural Households in India: On Some Consequences of Caste, Religion and Democracy.” World Development 28 (12): 2169–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branston, J. R., Sugden, R., et al. 2006. “Generating Participation and Democracy: An Illustration from Electricity Reform in Mexico.” International Review of Applied Economics 20 (1): 4768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D. S. 1999. “Reading, Writing, and Regime Type.” Political Research Quarterly 52 (4): 681707.Google Scholar
Brown, D. S., and Hunter, W. A.. 1999. “Democracy and Social Spending in Latin America, 1980–1992.American Political Science Review 93 (4): 779–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, B., Morrow, J. D., et al. 2001. “Political Competition and Economic Growth.” Journal of Democracy 12 (1): 5872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, B., Morrow, J. D., et al. 2002. “Political Institutions, Policy Choice and the Survival of Leaders.” British Journal of Political Science 32: 559–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, B., Smith, A., et al. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
de Schweinitz, K. 1964. Industrialization and Democracy. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
De Soto, H. 2000. The Mystery of Capital. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Dornbusch, R., and Edwards, S.. 1991. The Macroeconomics of Populism in Latin America. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubash, N. K., and Rajan, S. C.. 2002. “India: Electricity Reform under Political Constraints.” Power Politics: Equity and Environment in Electricity Reform. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute, 23.Google Scholar
Foster, A., and Rosenzweig, M.. 2001. “Democratization, Decentralization and the Distribution of Local Public Goods in a Poor Rural Economy.” Working Paper.Google Scholar
Galenson, W. 1959. Labor and Economic Development. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Grossman, G., and Helpman, E.. 2001. Special Interest Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haggard, S. 1990. Pathways from the Periphery: The Politics of Growth in the Newly Industrializing Countries. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Henisz, W., and Zelner, B.. 2006. “Interest Grops, Veto Points and Electricity Infrastructure Deployment.” International Organization 60 (1): 263–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, S. P. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
International Energy Agency. 2000. “Energy Statistics of Non-OECD Countries 1997–1998.” www.iea.org/dbtw-wpd/bookshop/add.aspx?id=30. (January 2001).Google Scholar
International Energy Agency. 2002.World Energy Outlook. Paris: International Energy Agency.Google Scholar
Jamasb, T. 2002. Reform and Regulation of the Electricity Sectors in Developing Countries. Cambridge: The Cambridge-MIT Institute.Google Scholar
John, K. 2003. “Democracy, Accountability, and International Health.” The Lancet (9386): 826.Google Scholar
Lake, D. A., and Baum, M. A., et al. 2001. “The Invisible Hand of Democracy: Political Control and the Provision of Public Services.” Comparative Political Studies 34 (6): 587621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leftwich, A. 2002. “Democracy and Development.” New Political Economy 7 (2): 269–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindseth, O. A. 2002. Russia Energy Survey. Paris: International Energy Agency.Google Scholar
Lipscomb, M., Mobarak, A. M., and Barham, T.. 2008. “Development Effects of Electricity: Evidence from the Geologic Placement of Hydropower Plants in Brazil.” Manuscript, Yale University.Google Scholar
Maddala, G. S. 1983. Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, M. G. 2003. “Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2002.” www.cidcm.umd.edu/inscr/polity/. (June 25, 2004).Google Scholar
McGillivray, F. 2004. Privileging Industry: The Comparative Politics of Trade and Industrial Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McKinnish, T. 2008. “Panel Data Models and Transitory Fluctuations in the Explanatory Variable.” In Advances in Econometrics. vol. 21, eds. Millimet, D. L., Smith, J. A., and Vytlacil, E. J.. Amsterdam: JAI.Google Scholar
Mobarak, A. M. 2005. “Democracy, Volatility and Development.” Review of Economics and Statistics 87 (2): 348–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murillo, M. V. 2001. Conviction Versus Necessity: Public Utility Privatization in Argentina, Chile and Mexico. New Haven, CT: Yale Center for International and Area Studies.Google Scholar
Murillo, M. V., and Martínez-Gallardo, C.. 2007. “Political Competition and Policy Adoption: Market Reforms in Latin American Public Utilities.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (1): 120–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nellis, J. 2003. Privatization in Latin America. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.Google Scholar
Olson, M. 1993. “Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development.” American Political Science Review 87 (3): 567–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olukoju, A. 2004. “‘Never Expect Power Always’: Electricity Consumers' Response to Monopoly, Corruption and Inefficient Services in Nigeria.” African Affairs 103: 5171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastor, M. Jr and Sung, J. H.. 1995. “Private Investment and Democracy in the Developing World.” Journal of Economic Issues 29 (1): 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peltzman, S. 1976. “Toward a More General Theory of Regulation.” Journal of Law and Economics 19 (2): 211–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, C. W. 2000. “Better Energy Services, Better Energy Sectors—and Links to the Poor.” Energy Services for the World's Poor. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A. 1990. The State and the Economy under Capitalism. London: Harwood Academic.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M. M., et al. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the World, 1950–1990. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remmer, K. L. 1990. “Democracy and Economic Crisis: the Latin American Experience.” World Politics April (3): 315–35.Google Scholar
Rodrik, D. 1999. “Democracies Pay Higher Wages.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 (3): 707–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singell, L. Jr.Lillydahl, J., and Singell, L. Sr. 1996. “Will Changing Times Change the Allocation of Faculty Time?Journal of Human Resources 31 (2): 429–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, G. J. 1971. “The Theory of Economic Regulation.” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2 (1): 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turkson, J., and Wohlgemuth, N.. 2000. “Power Sector Reform and Distributed Generation in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Energy Policy 29: 135–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of Energy. 2004. “Country Analysis Briefs: Saudi Arabia.” www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/saudi.html. (June 25, 2004).Google Scholar
Williams, J. H., and Ghanadan, R.. 2006. “Electricity Reform in Developing and Transition Countries: A Reappraisal.” Energy 31: 815–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wintrobe, R. 1998. The Political Economy of Dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. 1999. Meeting India's Energy Needs (1998–1999): A Country Sector Review. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2004. Word Development Report. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
67
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Transforming Power of Democracy: Regime Type and the Distribution of Electricity
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The Transforming Power of Democracy: Regime Type and the Distribution of Electricity
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The Transforming Power of Democracy: Regime Type and the Distribution of Electricity
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *