Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-mm7gn Total loading time: 0.425 Render date: 2022-08-17T09:13:22.042Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Who Keeps International Commitments and Why? The International Criminal Court and Bilateral Nonsurrender Agreements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2007

JUDITH KELLEY
Affiliation:
Duke University

Abstract

What do countries do when they have committed to a treaty, but then find that commitment challenged? After the creation of the International Criminal Court, the United States tried to get countries, regardless of whether they were parties to the Court or not, to sign agreements not to surrender Americans to the Court. Why did some states sign and others not? Given United States power and threats of military sanctions, some states did sign. However, such factors tell only part of the story. When refusing to sign, many states emphasized the moral value of the court. Further, states with a high domestic rule of law emphasized the importance of keeping their commitment. This article therefore advances two classic arguments that typically are difficult to substantiate; namely, state preferences are indeed partly normative, and international commitments do not just screen states; they also constrain.

Type
ARTICLES
Copyright
© 2007 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott Kenneth, and Duncan Snidal. 2000. “Hard and Soft Law in International Governance.” International Organization 54 (June): 42156.Google Scholar
ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly, 2003. Resolution on the International Criminal Court, adopted by the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly held in Brazzaville, Republic of the Congo from 31 March to 3 April 2003. ACP-EU 3560/03/fin.
Amnesty International. 2003. International Criminal Court: The unlawful attempt by the Security Council to give US Citizens permanent impunity from international justice. AI Index: OR 40/006/2003. http://iccnow.org/documents/otherissues/1422/Amnesty1422May2003.pdf.
Annan Kofi. 1998. “A Step Toward Universal Human Rights.” New Straits Times Press (30 July).
Arsanjani Mahnoush. 1999. “The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.” The American Journal of International Law (January): 2243.Google Scholar
Bachrach Peter, and Morton Baratz. 1963. “Decisions and Nondecisions: An Analytical Framework.” American Political Science Review 57 (September): 63242.Google Scholar
Bassiouni Cherif. 1998. The Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Documentary History. Ardsley: Transnational Publishers.
Bolton John. 2002. Remarks to the Federalist Society, Washington, DC, November 14.
Bolton John. 2003. “American Justice and the International Criminal Court.” Remarks at the American Enterprise Institute Washington, DC. 3 November.
Brambor Thomas, William Roberts Clark, Matt Golder. 2006. “Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses.” Political Analysis 14 (Winter): 6382.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita et al. 1999. “An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace.” American Political Science Review 93 (December): 791807.Google Scholar
Busch Marc L., and Eric Reinhardt. 2002. “Testing International Trade Law: Empirical Studies of GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement,” in The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec, ed. Daniel L. M. Kennedy and James D. Southwick, 457–81. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bush George. 2002. Remarks by President Bush and President Alvaro Uribe of Colombia in Photo Opportunity. The Oval Office, Office of the Press Secretary, September 25, 2002.
Carr Edward. 1964. The Twenty-years Crisis, 1991–1939. An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. 2nd edition. Reprint. London: Macmillan.
Central Intelligence Agency, 2003. The World Fact Book. Washington, DC.
Central Intelligence Agency, 2004. The World Fact Book. Washington, DC.
Chayes Abraham and Antonia Chayes. 1993. “On Compliance.” International Organization 47 (Spring): 175205.Google Scholar
Cingranelli David, and David Richards. 2004. The Cingranelli-Richards (CIRI) Human Rights Dataset. http://www. humanrightsdata.com.
Coalition for the International Criminal Court. 2006. “Country positions on Bilateral Immunity Agreements (chronological archive)Available from author or from http://www.iccnow.org/documents/BIAdb_Current.xls. Last accessed August 26, 2006.
Congressional Research Report. 2002. “U.S. Policy Regarding the International Criminal Court.” Version: Updated 3 Sept.
Costa Rica Wants to be Spared from a US Freeze on Military Aid July 4., 2003. BBC Monitoring International Reports.
Council of Europe. 2003. Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. Threats to the International Criminal Court. Resolution 1336 (2003)[1].
Dai Xinyuan. 2006. “The Conditional Nature of Democratic Compliance.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 (October): 124.Google Scholar
de Mesquita Bruce, and George Downs. 2006. “Intervention and Democracy.” International Organization 60 (July): 62749.Google Scholar
DITSHWANELO. 17 July 2003. Press release on the United States/Botswana ICC Agreement 2.
Dixon William. 1993. “Democracy and the Management of International Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 37 (March): 4268.Google Scholar
Downs George, David Rocke, and Peter Barsoom. 1996. “Is the good news about compliance good news about cooperation?International Organization 50 (Summer): 379406.Google Scholar
Du Plessis Max. 2004, July 22. Re: Research question on the ICC. [Personal email]. (2004, July 22).
EU Presidency. 2004. Statement by the Presidency on behalf of the European Union on reaffirming the EU position supporting the integrity of the Rome Statute, 27 July 2004.
European Union. 2002. Annex: General Secretariat of the Council. Conclusions on the ICC in response to US-proposed bilateral nonsurrender agreements with EU member states. September.
Fearon James D. 1994. “Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes.” American Political Science Review 88 (September): 57792.Google Scholar
Fed: Labor says reject US pressure for ICC deal. 2002. AAP Newsfeed, August 28.
Finnemore Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization 52 (Autumn): 887917.Google Scholar
Franck Thomas. 1990. The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gaubatz Kurt T. 1996. Democratic states and commitment in international relations. International Organization 50 (Winter): 109–39.Google Scholar
Greig Brian. 2002. Press Release No. 02/466 on September 26, 2002. Available online at http://www.democrats.org.au/news/?press_id= 2157&display=1. Accessed November 22, 2005.
Hathaway Oona. 2003. The Cost of Commitment. Stanford Law Review 55: 182162.Google Scholar
Henkin Louis. 1979. How nations behave: Law and foreign policy. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.
Human Rights Watch. 1999. World report, special issues and campaigns. Available at http://www.hrw.org/worldreport99/special/icc.html.
Hurd Ian. 1999. “Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics.” International Organization 53 (Spring): 379408.Google Scholar
Katzenstein Peter, and Robert Keohane. 2006. Anti-Americanism in World Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Katzenstein Peter. 1996. “Introduction: Alternative Perspectives on National Security.” In The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, ed. Peter Katzenstein. New York: Columbia University Press, 132.
Kaufmann Daniel, Aart Kraay, and Massimo Mastruzzi. 2005. Governance Matters IV: Governance Indicators for 1996–2004, World Bank$, $Draft, May 9, 2005.
Kelley Judith. 2005. “Strategic Non-Cooperation As Soft Balancing: Why Iraq Was Not Just About Iraq.” International Politics 42 (June): 15373.Google Scholar
Kelley Judith. 2006. Author's telephone interview with Sonia Picado, Tuesday September 2, 2003.
Keohane Robert, and Lisa Martin. 1995. “The Promise of Institutionalist Theory.” International Security 20 (Summer): 3951.Google Scholar
Keohane Robert. 1992. “Compliance With International Commitments: Politics Within A Framework Of Law.” American Society of International Law Proceedings 86: 176.Google Scholar
Keohane Robert. 1997. “International Relations and International Law: Two Optics.” Harvard International Law Journal 38 (Spring): 487502.Google Scholar
King Gary, Michael Tomz, and Jason Wittenberg (2000). “Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (April): 347–61.Google Scholar
Klotz Audie. 1995. “Norms Reconstituting Interests: Global Racial Equality and U.S. Sanction against South Africa.” International Organization 49 (Summer): 45178.Google Scholar
Lake David. 1992. “Powerful Pacifists: Democratic States and War.” American Political Science Review 86 (March): 2437.Google Scholar
Lynch Colum. 2003. “U.S. Confronts EU On War Crimes Court; Immunity Pact Issue Threatens Relations.” The Washington Post, June 10, A17.
March James, and Johan Olsen. 1984. “The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life.” American Political Science Review 78 (September): 73449.Google Scholar
Marshall Monty, and Keith Jaggers. 2003. Polity IV Project. Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions 1800–2003. http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/inscr/polity/index.htm.dat.
McGinn Robert. 1971. “About Face.” Social Theory and Practice (1): 8796.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer John. 19941995. “The False Promise of International Institutions.” International Security 19 (Winter): 526.Google Scholar
Mercer Jonathan. 1996. Reputation and International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Milner Helen. 1997. Interests, institutions, and information: Domestic Politics and International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Mmegi editorial angers government, 15 July, 2003. Government publication, Daily News Online.
Moravcsik Andrew. 1997. “Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics.” International Organization 51 (Autumn): 51353.Google Scholar
Morgenthau Hans J. 1948. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Morris Madeline. 2001. “High Crimes and Misconceptions: The ICC and Non-Party States.” Law & Contemporary Problems 64 (Winter): 13.Google Scholar
Mukumbira Rodrick. 2003. “Botswana: up USA, down ICC: after days of denials, Botswana has finally admitted signing an agreement with America giving US citizens immunity from prosecution by the International Criminal Court (ICC).” New African 421 (August–September 2003): 26 (1).Google Scholar
O'Neill Barry. 1999. Honor, Symbols and War. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Office of the US Trade Representative. 2006. Generalized System Of Preferences (GSP). 2006, September 25. http://www.itds.treas.gov/gsp.html.
Oppenheim L. 1912. International Law. London: Longmans, Green. 2nd edition.
Opposition Says StateSucking UpTo Us Over War Crimes Treaty, July 16, 2003. BBC Monitoring International Reports.
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. 2003a. Risks for the integrity of the Statute of the International Criminal Court Provisional edition. Resolution 1300 (2002)[1].
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. 2003b. Threats to the International Criminal Court. Resolution 1336 (2003)[1].
Raustiala Kal and David Victor. 1998. “Conclusions,” in The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments, ed. David Victor, Kal Raustiala and Eugene Skolnikof, 659707. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Rodríguez Victor 2003, August 13. Fw: inquiry. [Personal email] (2003, August 13).
Schabas William. 2001. An Introduction to the International Criminal Court. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schachter Oscar. 1991. International Law In Theory And Practice. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
Scharf Michael. 2001. “The ICC's Jurisdiction Over the Nationals of Non-Party States: A Critique of The U.S. Position.” Law & Contemporary Problems 64 (Winter): 67118.Google Scholar
Scheffer David. 1999. “The United States and the International Criminal Court.” The American Journal of International Law 93 (January): 1222.Google Scholar
Scheffer David. 2002. “Original Intent at the Global Criminal Court.” Wall Street Journal Europe September 20.
Schelling Thomas. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Simmons Beth, and Daniel Hopkins. 2005. “The Constraining Power of International Treaties.” American Political Science Review 99 (November): 62331.Google Scholar
Simmons Beth and Zachary Elkins. 2004. “The Globalization of Liberalization: Policy Diffusion in the International Political Economy.” American Political Science Review 98 (February): 17189.Google Scholar
Simmons Beth. 1998. “Compliance with International Agreements.” Annual Review of Political Science 1 (June): 7593.Google Scholar
Simmons Beth. 2000. “International Law and State Behavior: Commitment and Compliance in International Monetary Affairs.” American Political Science Review 94 (December): 81935.Google Scholar
Slaughter Anne-Marie. 1995. “International Law in a World of Liberal States.” European Journal of International Law 6 (4): 50338.Google Scholar
Stein Eric. (1994) “International Law in Internal Law: Toward Internationalization of Central-Eastern European Constitutions?American Journal of International Law 88 (3): 42750.Google Scholar
Stewart Cameron. 2002. Downer backs US war Court Request, The Australian, 29 August 2002. http://www.npwj.org/?q= node/617.
Stewart Cameron. 2004. “Howard rebuff to United States over war crimes.” The Australian, December 3, 2004: 2.
Strange Susan. 1982. “Cave! Hic Dragones: A Critique of Regime Analysis.” International Organization 36 (Spring): 47996.Google Scholar
Struett Michael, and Steven Weldon. 2006. “Explaining State Decisions to Ratify the International Criminal Court Treaty.” Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, Aug. 30–Sept. 2.
Tayler Letta. October 17, 2004. U.S. at Odds Over World Tribunal. Newsday.
Tomz Michael, Jason Wittenberg, and Gary King (2001). CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results. Version 2.0 Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, June 1. http://gking.harvard.ed.
Tomz Michael. 2005. The Influence of International Agreements on Foreign Policy Preferences. Stanford University, Unpublished Manuscript.
Trimble Phillip. 1990. “International Law, World Order and Critical Legal Studies.” Stanford Law Review 42 (February): 81145.Google Scholar
Ugalde Sergio September 18, 2003. Re: research request. [Personal email] (September 18, 2003).
U.S. Department of Defense. 2002. Secretary Rumsfeld Statement on the ICC. United States Department of Defense, press release No. 233-02.
USA, Botswana agreement is invalid. 18 July, 2003. Mmegi/The Reporter online.
Wedgwood Ruth. 1999. “An International Criminal Court: An American View.” European Journal of International Law 10 (1): 93107.Google Scholar
Weiss Edith and Harold Jacobson. 1998. “Assessing the record of Designing strategies to engage countries” in Engaging Countries: Strengthening Compliance with International Accords, eds. Edith Weiss and Harold Jacobson, 511–54. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Weller Marc. 2002. “Undoing the global constitution: UN Security Council action on the International Criminal Court.” International Affairs 78 (October): 693712.Google Scholar
Young Oran R. 1979. Compliance with Public Authority. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
93
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Who Keeps International Commitments and Why? The International Criminal Court and Bilateral Nonsurrender Agreements
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Who Keeps International Commitments and Why? The International Criminal Court and Bilateral Nonsurrender Agreements
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Who Keeps International Commitments and Why? The International Criminal Court and Bilateral Nonsurrender Agreements
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *