Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 28
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Beienburg, Sean and Frymer, Paul 2016. The People Against Themselves: Rethinking Popular Constitutionalism. Law & Social Inquiry, Vol. 41, Issue. 1, p. 242.


    Shpaizman, Ilana 2016. Identifying Relevant Cases of Conversion and Drift Using the Comparative Agendas Project. Policy Studies Journal, p. n/a.


    DiTomaso, Nancy 2015. Racism and discrimination versus advantage and favoritism: Bias for versus bias against. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 35, p. 57.


    Carlson, Kirsten Matoy 2014. Political Failure, Judicial Opportunity: The Supreme Court of Canada and Aboriginal and Treaty Rights. American Review of Canadian Studies, Vol. 44, Issue. 3, p. 334.


    Ley, Aaron J. 2014. The Costs and Benefits of American Policy-Making Venues. Law & Society Review, Vol. 48, Issue. 1, p. 91.


    Greenfest, Seth W. 2013. Explaining Congressional Grants of Jurisdiction to the Federal District Courts. Justice System Journal, Vol. 34, Issue. 3, p. 274.


    Hirschl, Ran 2013. EPILOGUE: COURTS AND DEMOCRACY BETWEEN IDEALS AND REALITIES. Representation, Vol. 49, Issue. 3, p. 361.


    Barnes, Jeb and Burke, Thomas F. 2012. Making Way: Legal Mobilization, Organizational Response, and Wheelchair Access. Law & Society Review, Vol. 46, Issue. 1, p. 167.


    Cole, Wade M. 2012. Institutionalizing shame: The effect of Human Rights Committee rulings on abuse, 1981–2007. Social Science Research, Vol. 41, Issue. 3, p. 539.


    Langridge, Ruth 2011. When Do Challengers Succeed? Nongovernmental Actors, Administrative Agencies, and Legal Change: Shifting Rules for Oregon's Private Forests. Law & Social Inquiry, Vol. 36, Issue. 3, p. 662.


    Milkis, Sidney M. and Tichenor, Daniel J. 2011. Reform’s Mating Dance: Presidents, Social Movements, and Racial Realignments. Journal of Policy History, Vol. 23, Issue. 04, p. 451.


    Wilson, Joshua C. 2011. Sustaining the State: Legal Consciousness and the Construction of Legality in Competing Abortion Activists' Narratives. Law & Social Inquiry, Vol. 36, Issue. 2, p. 455.


    Barnes, Jeb 2010. Law's Allure and an Interbranch Perspective on Law and Politics. Law & Social Inquiry, Vol. 35, Issue. 4, p. 1029.


    Staszak, Sarah 2010. Institutions, Rulemaking, and the Politics of Judicial Retrenchment. Studies in American Political Development, Vol. 24, Issue. 02, p. 168.


    Barnes, Jeb 2009. In Defense of Asbestos Tort Litigation: Rethinking Legal Process Analysis in a World of Uncertainty, Second Bests, and Shared Policy-Making Responsibility. Law & Social Inquiry, Vol. 34, Issue. 1, p. 5.


    Barnes, Jeb 2009. In Defense of Asbestos Tort Litigation: Rethinking Legal Process Analysis in a World of Uncertainty, Second Bests, and Shared Policy-Making Responsibility. Law & Social Inquiry, Vol. 34, Issue. 1, p. 5.


    Keck, Thomas M. 2009. Beyond Backlash: Assessing the Impact of Judicial Decisions on LGBT Rights. Law & Society Review, Vol. 43, Issue. 1, p. 151.


    Swedlow, Brendon 2009. Reason for Hope? The Spotted Owl Injunctions and Policy Change. Law & Social Inquiry, Vol. 34, Issue. 4, p. 825.


    Worthen, Helena and Haynes, Rev. Anthony 2009. Outcomes of Two Construction Trades Pre-Apprenticeship Programs: A Comparison. Journal of Community Practice, Vol. 17, Issue. 1-2, p. 207.


    Frymer, Paul 2008. Law and American Political Development. Law & Social Inquiry, Vol. 33, Issue. 3, p. 779.


    ×

Acting When Elected Officials Won't: Federal Courts and Civil Rights Enforcement in U.S. Labor Unions, 1935–85

  • PAUL FRYMER (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055403000820
  • Published online: 01 August 2003
Abstract

Using the racial integration of national labor unions as a case study, I find that courts played an important and meaningfully autonomous role in integrating unions while elected officials largely failed to act. Courts, unlike elected officials, offered civil rights groups relatively easy access to the legal agenda. In response to thousands of cases in federal courts, judges rewrote key civil rights statutes, oversaw the implementation of their rulings, and used attorneys' fees and damage awards to impose significant financial costs on resistant unions. Court power was the product of multiple and historically contingent forces that involved the interaction of elected officials, civil rights activists, and the legal community. Elected officials delegated to the courts the power to enforce civil rights laws and tacitly endorsed procedural changes that augmented the courts' institutional powers and the legal community's professional influence. In response, judges and lawyers promoted and implemented a civil rights agenda far beyond the endorsement of elected officials. An historical–institutional approach helps explain how courts achieved and wielded independent power and the consequences of their action for civil rights, labor unions, and the American state.Thanks for very helpful comments go to Amy Bridges, Kerstin Carlson, Malcolm Feeley, Beth Garrett, Howard Gillman, Mark Graber, Jeff Haydu, David Karol, Ken Kersch, David Mayhew, Jim Morone, Shehzad Nadeem, Ruth O'Brien, Corey Robin, Pam Singh, John Skrentny, Mark Tushnet, Rick Valelly, Keith Whittington, Janelle Wong, the APSR reviewers, and Lee Sigelman. The University of California's Institute for Labor and Employment provided generous financial assistance.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×