Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Buying Expertise: Campaign Contributions and Attention to Policy Analysis in Congressional Committees


I examine the relationship between interest group hard money contributions and legislators' attention to policy analysis in U.S. congressional committees. I argue that groups tend to contribute to members who have a high capacity to develop effective policies and legislation. Consequently, over the long term, contributions create incentives for members of Congress to enhance their analytical capacity for policymaking. Using data from hearings on the Medicare program and latent variable modeling techniques, I demonstrate that members who have a higher latent analytical policymaking capacity tend to attract more contributions and at the same time tend to engage in analytical discourse in committee hearings. In addition, members with higher analytical capacity tend to disengage from discussions of the symbolic aspects of policies that are of interest to constituents. The results help shed new light on debates over campaign finance reform regarding the normative value of hard money contributions.

Corresponding author
Kevin M. Esterling is Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, University of California, Riverside, 900 University Avenue, Riverside, CA 92521 (
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

AlexanderBrad. 2005. “Good Money and Bad Money: Do Funding Sources Affect Electoral Outcomes?Political Research Quarterly 58 (June): 35358.

Austen-SmithDavid. 1995. “Campaign Contributions and Access.” American Political Science Review 89 (September): 56681.

Austen-SmithDavid. 1998. “Allocating Access for Information and Contributions.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 14 (October): 277303.

BiancoWilliam T. 1994. Trust: Representatives and Constituents. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

BollingRichard. 1986. “Money in Politics.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 486 (July): 7685.

Box-SteffensmeierJanet M., and J. TobinGrant. 1999. “All in a Day's Work: The Financial Rewards of Legislative Effectiveness.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 24 (November): 51123.

BronarsStephen G., and John R.Lott, Jr. 1997. “Do Campaign Contributions Alter How a Politician Votes? Or, Do Donors Support Candidates Who Value the Same Things That They Do?Journal of Law and Economics 40 (October): 31750.

DenzauArthur T., and Michael C.Munger. 1986. “Legislators and Interest Groups: How Unorganized Interests Get Represented.” American Political Science Review 80 (March): 89106.

DruckmanJames N., and Kjersten R.Nelson. 2003. “Framing and Deliberation: How Citizens' Conversations Limit Elite Influence.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (October): 72945.

EsterlingKevin M. 2004. The Political Economy of Expertise: Information and Efficiency in American National Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

FellowesMatthew C., and Patrick J.Wolf. 2004. “Funding Mechanisms and Policy Instruments: How Business Campaign Contributions Influence Congressional Votes.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (June): 31524.

GordonStacy B. 2001. “All Votes are Not Created Equal: Campaign Contributions and Critical Votes.” Journal of Politics 63 (February): 24969.

GrenzkeJanet M. 1989. “PACs and the Congressional Supermarket: The Currency is Complex.” American Journal of Political Science 33 (February): 124.

HallRichard L., and Frank W.Wayman. 1990. “Buying Time: Moneyed Interests and the Mobilization of Bias in Congressional Committees.” American Political Science Review 84 (September): 797820.

HamiltonJames T. 1997. “Taxes, Torts, and the Toxic Release Inventory: Congressional Voting on Instruments to Control Pollution.” Economic Inquiry 35 (October): 74562.

LangbeinLaura I. 1986. “Money and Access: Some Empirical Evidence.” Journal of Politics 48 (November): 105262.

MathiasCharles Mc C., Jr. 1986. “Should There be Public Financing of Congressional Campaigns?Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 486 (July): 6475.

PetersonMark A. 1997. “The Limits of Social Learning: Translating Analysis into Action.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 22 (August): 107714.

SkrondalAnders, and SophiaRabe-Hesketh. 2004. Generalized Latent Variable Modeling: Multilevel, Longitudinal, and Structural Equation Models, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall.

WawroGregory. 2000. Legislative Entrepreneurship in the House of Representatives. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

WawroGregory. 2001. “A Panel Probit Analysis of Campaign Contributions and Roll-Call Votes.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (July): 56379.

WrightJohn R. 1990. “Contributions, Lobbying, and Committee Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review 84 (June): 41738.

WrightJohn R. 1989. “PAC Contributions, Lobbying, and Representation.” Journal of Politics 51 (August): 71329.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 6
Total number of PDF views: 63 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 194 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.