Abramson, Paul R., Aldrich, John H., Blais, Andre, Diamond, Matthew, Diskin, Abraham, Indridason, Indridi, Lee, Daniel, and Levine, Renan. 2010. “Comparing Strategic Voting under FPTP and PR.” Comparative Political Studies 43 (1): 61–90.
Adams, James, Bishin, Benjamin G., and Dow, Jay K.. 2004. “Representation in Congressional Campaigns: Evidence for Discounting/Directional Voting in U.S. Senate Elections.” Journal of Politics 66: 348–73.
Adams, James, Clark, Michael, Ezrow, Lawrence, and Glasgow, Garrett. 2004. “Understanding Change and Stability in Party Ideologies: Do Parties Respond to Public Opinion or to Past Election Results?” British Journal of Political Science 34: 589–610.
Adams, James, and Merrill, Samuel III. 1999. “Party Strategies and Policy Representation in Multiparty Elections: Why Are Strategies so Extreme?” American Journal of Political Science 43 (3): 765–91.
Adams, James F., Merrill, Samuel III, and Grofman, Bernard. 2005. A Unified Theory of Party Competition: A Cross-national Analysis Integrating Spatial and Behavioral Factors. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Aldrich, John H., Blais, Andre, Indridason, Indridi, and Levine, Renan. 2005. “Coalition Considerations and the Vote.” In Elections in Israel 2003, eds. Asher, Arian and Shamir, Michal. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 143–66.
Alesina, Alberto, and Rosenthal, Howard. 1995. Partisan Politics, Divided Government and the Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Alford, Robert R. 1963. Party and Society: The Anglo-American Democracies. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Alt, James E., and Chrystal, K. Alec. 1983. Political Economics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Alvarez, Michael R., and Nagler, Jonathan. 1998. “When Politics and Models Collide: Estimating Models of Multiparty Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 42: 55–96.
Anderson, Robert. 2007. “Kingmaker Set to Shift Denmark's Direction.” Financial Times, November 13.
Armstrong, David, and Duch, Raymond. 2010. “Why Can Voters Anticipate Post-election Coalition Formation Likelihoods?” Electoral Studies 29 (3): 308–15.
Austen-Smith, David, and Banks, Jeffrey. 1988. “Elections, Coalitions and Legislative Outcomes.” American Political Science Review 82: 405–22.
Bakker, Ryan, and Armstrong, David A.. 2010. “Missing Data and the Gibbs Sampler: A Simple Approach to Estimating Models with Missing Data.” Unpublished manuscript.
Bakker, Ryan, Edwards, Erica, and Netjes, Catherine. N.d. “Fickle Parties or Changing Dimensions? Testing the Comparability of Party Manifesto Data across Time and Space.” Political Analysis. Forthcoming.
Bargsted, Matias, and Kedar, Orit. 2009. “Coalition-targeted Duvergerian Voting: How Expectations Affect Voter Choice under Proportional Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 53: 307–23.
Benoit, Kenneth, and Laver, Michael. 2007. “Estimating Party Positions: Comparing Expert Surveys and Hand-coded Content Analysis.” Electoral Studies 26 (1): 90–107.
Berinsky, Adam. 1997. “Heterogeneity and Bias in Models of Vote Choice.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
Blais, Andre, Aldrich, John H., Indridason, Indridi, and Levine, R.. 2006. “Do Voters Vote for Government Coalitions?: Testing Downs' Pessimistic Conclusion.” Party Politics 12: 691–705.
Blais, Andre, Blake, Donald, and Dion, Stephen. 1993. “Do Parties Make a Difference? Parties and the Size of Government in Liberal Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science 37: 40–62.
Blais, Andre, Nadeau, Richard, Gidengil, Elisabeth, and Nevitte, Neil. 2001. “Measuring Strategic Voting in Multiparty Plurality Elections.” Electoral Studies 20: 343–52.
Borre, Ole. 1984. “Critical Electoral Change in Scandinavia.” In Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies: Realignment or Dealignment?, eds. Dalton, Russell J., Beck, Paul A., and Flanagan, Scott C.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 330–64.
Bowler, Shaun, Karp, Jeffrey A., and Donovan, Todd. 2010. “Strategic Coalition Voting: Evidence from New Zealand.” Electoral Studies 29: 350–57.
Brehm, John. 1993. The Phantom Respondents: Opinion Survey and Political Representation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Budge, Ian, Crewe, Ivor, and Farlie, Denis, eds. 1976. Party Identification and Beyond: Representation of Voting and Party Competition. New York: Wiley.
Budge, Ian, and Robertson, David. 1987. “Do Parties Differ, and How? Comparative Discriminant and Factor Analyses.” In Ideology, Strategy and Party Change: Spatial Analyses of Post-war Election Programmes in 19 Democracies, eds. Budge, Ian, Robertson, David, and Hearl, Derek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 388–416.
Butler, David, and Stokes, Donald. 1969. Political Change in Britain: Force Shaping Electoral Choice. London: Macmillan.
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, David E.. 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Claassen, Ryan L. 2007. “Ideology and Evaluation in an Experimental Setting: Comparing the Proximity and the Directional Models.” Political Research Quarterly 60: 263–74.
Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Daalder, H. 1986. “Changing Procedures and Changing Strategies in Dutch Coalition Building.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 9: 507–81.
Dalton, Russell J. 2002. Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. New York: Chatham House.
De Sinopoli, Francesco, and Iannantuoni, Giovanna. 2007. “A Spatial Voting Model Where Proportional Rule Leads to Two-party Equilibria.” International Journal of Game Theory 35: 267–87.
Dow, Jay K., and Endersby, James W.. 2004. “Multinomial Probit and Multinomial Logit: A Comparison of Choice Models for Voting Research.” Electoral Studies 23: 107–22.
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
Duch, Raymond M., and Stevenson, Randy. 2008. The Economic Vote: How Political and Economic Institutions Condition Election Results. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Enelow, James M., and Hinich, Melvin. 1984. The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Enelow, James M., and Hinich, Melvin J.. 1994. “A Test of the Predictive Dimensions Model in Spatial Voting Theory.” Public Choice 78: 155–69.
Fey, Mark. 1997. “Stability and Coordination in Duverger's Law: A Formal Model of Preelection Polls and Strategic Voting.” American Political Science Review 91: 135–47.
Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Forsythe, Robert, Myerson, Roger, Rietz, Thomas, and Weber, Robert. 1993. “An Experiment on Coordination in Multi-candidate Elections: The Importance of Poll and Election Histories.” Social Choice and Welfare 10: 223–47.
Forsythe, Robert, Myerson, Roger, Rietz, Thomas, and Weber, Robert. 1996. “An Experimental Study of Voting Rules and Polls in Three-way Elections.” International Journal of Game Theory 25: 355–83.
Gelman, Andrew, and Rubin, Donald B.. 1992. “Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences.” Statistical Science 7: 457–511.
Glasgow, Garrett, and Alvarez, Michael. 2005. “Voting Behavior and the Electoral Context of Government Formation.” Electoral Studies 24: 245–64.
Golder, Sona. 2006. “Pre-electoral Coalition Formation in Parliamentary Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science 36: 193–212.
Goodin, Robert E., Guth, Werner, and Sausgruber, Rupert. 2007. “When to Coalesce: Early Versus Late Coalition Announcements in an Experimental Democracy.” British Journal of Political Science 38: 181–91.
Grofman, Bernard. 1985. “The Neglected Role of the Status Quo in Models of Issue Voting.” Journal of Politics 47: 230–37.
Gschwend, Thomas. 2007. “Ticket-splitting and Strategic Voting under Mixed Electoral Rules: Evidence from Germany.” European Journal of Political Research 46: 1–23.
Heidelberger, P. and Welch, P.D.. 1981. “A Spectral Method for Confidence Interval Generation and Run Length Control in Simulations.” Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery 24: 233–45.
Herron, Michael C. 1999. “Postestimation Uncertainty in Limited Dependent Variable Models.” Political Analysis 8 (1): 83–98.
Holmberg, Soren. 1994. “Party Identification Compared Across the Atlantic.” In Elections at Home and Abroad: Essays in Honor of Warren E. Miller, eds. Jennings, M. Kent and Mann, Thomas E.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 93–121.
Huber, John, and Inglehart, Ronald. 1995. “Expert Interpretations of Party Space and Party Locations in 42 Societies.” Party Politics 1: 73–111.
Indridason, Indridi H. 2007. “Modeling Proportional Representation in Majoritarian Legislatures.” Unpublished manuscript.
Inglehart, Ron. 1977. Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Inglehart, Ron, and Hans-Dieter Klingemann. 1976. “Party Identification, Ideological Preference and the Left–Right Dimension among Western Mass Publics.” In Party Identification and Beyond: Representations of Voting and Party Competition, eds. Budge, Ian, Crewe, Ivor, and Farlie, Dennis J.. London: John Wiley & Sons, 243–73.
Irwin, Galen A., and van Holsteyn, Joop J.M.. 2003. “They Say It Can't Be Done? Strategic Voting in Multi-party Proportional Systems: The Case of the Netherlands.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia.
Kedar, Orit. 2005. “When Moderate Voters Prefer Extreme Parties: Policy Balancing in Parliamentary Elections.” American Political Science Review 99 (2): 185–99.
Kedar, Orit. 2009. Voting for Policy, Not Parties: How Voters Compensate for Power Sharing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
King, Gary, Honaker, James, Anne Joseph, and Scheve, Kenneth. 2001. “Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation.” American Political Science Review 95: 49–69.
Knutsen, O. 1998. “Expert Judgements of the Left–Right Location of Political Parties: A Comparative Longitudinal Study.” West European Politics 21: 63–94.
Lacy, Dean, and Paolino, Phillip. 2005. “Testing Proximity Versus Directional Voting Using Experiments.” Manuscript.
Laver, Michael, and Budge, Ian. 1993. “The Policy Basis of Government Coalitions: A Comparative Investigation.” British Journal of Political Science 23: 499–519.
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., Jacoby, William George, Norpoth, Helmut, and Weisberg, Herbert F.. 2008. The American Voter Revisited. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Rokkan, Stein, eds. 1967. Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-national Perspectives. Toronto: Free Press.
Maddala, G.S. 1983. Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Martin, Lanny, and Stevenson, Randy. 2001. “Government Formation in Parliamentary Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science 45: 33–50.
Matthews, Steven A. 1979. “A Simple Direction Model of Electoral Competition.” Public Choice 34: 141–56.
McCuen, Brian, and Morton, Rebecca. 2010. “Tactical Coalition Voting and Information in the Laboratory.” Electoral Studies 29 (3): 316–28.
Meffert, Michael F., and Gschwend, Thomas. 2007a. “Polls, Coalition Signals, and Strategic Voting: An Experimental Investigation of Perceptions and Effects.” Unpublished manuscript. (Sonderforschungsbereich 504 No. 07-63)
Meffert, Michael F., and Gschwend, Thomas. 2007b. “Strategic Voting under Proportional Representation and Coalition Governments: A Simulation and Laboratory Experiment.” Unpublished manuscript. (Sonderforschungsbereich 504 No. 07-55)
Merrill, Samuel III, and Grofman, Bernard. 1999. A Unified Theory of Voting: Directional and Proximity Spatial Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Niemi, Richard, and Weisberg, Herb. 1992. Controversies in Voting Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ortuno-Ortin, Ignacio. 1997. “A Spatial Model of Political Competition and Proportional Representation.” Social Choice and Welfare 14: 427–38.
Peel, Quentin. 2007. “Danish Voters Fascinated More by Mathematics Than the Issues.” Financial Times, November 7.
Persson, Torsten, and Tabellini, Guido. 2000. Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Congress: A Political-economic History of Roll-call Voting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Powell, G. Bingham. 2006. “Election Laws and Representative Governments: Beyond Votes and Seats.” British Journal of Political Science 36: 291–315.
Rabinowitz, George. 1978. “On the Nature of Political Issues: Insights from a Spatial Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 22 (4): 793–817.
Rabinowitz, George, and Macdonald, Stuart. 1989. “A Directional Theory of Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review 83 (1): 93–121.
Schafer, Joseph L. 1997. Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Schofield, Norman, and Laver, Michael. 1985. “Bargain Theory and Portfolio Payoffs in European Coalition Governments 1945–83.” British Journal of Political Science 15: 143–64.
Thomassen, J. 1976. “Party Identification as a Cross-national Concept: Its Meaning in the Netherlands.” In Party Identification and Beyond: Representations of Voting and Party Competition, eds. Budge, Ian, Crewe, Ivor, and Farlie, Dennis J.. London: John Wiley & Sons, 63–79.
Tomz, Michael, and Van Houweling, Robert P.. 2007. “The Microfoundations of Issue Voting.” Manuscript.
Train, Kenneth. 2003. Discrete Choice Models with Simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van der Eijk, Cees, and Niemoller, Kees. 1992. “Netherlands.” In Electoral Change: Responses to Evolving Social and Attitudinal Structure in Western Countries, eds. Franklin, Mark N., Mackie, Thomas T., and Valen, Henry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 255–83.
Warwick, Paul. 1992. “Ideological Diversity and Government Survival in Western European Parliamentary Democracies.” Comparative Political Studies 25: 332–61.
Westholm, Anders. 1997. “Distance Versus Direction: The Illusory Defeat of the Proximity Theory of Electoral Choice.” American Political Science Review 91 (4): 865–85.