Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
  • Home
Article
  • Cited by 8

  • Access

Democracy in America? Partisanship, Polarization, and the Robustness of Support for Democracy in the United States

  • MATTHEW H. GRAHAM (a1) and MILAN W. SVOLIK (a1)

Abstract

Is support for democracy in the United States robust enough to deter undemocratic behavior by elected politicians? We develop a model of the public as a democratic check and evaluate it using two empirical strategies: an original, nationally representative candidate-choice experiment in which some politicians take positions that violate key democratic principles, and a natural experiment that occurred during Montana’s 2017 special election for the U.S. House. Our research design allows us to infer Americans’ willingness to trade-off democratic principles for other valid but potentially conflicting considerations such as political ideology, partisan loyalty, and policy preferences. We find the U.S. public’s viability as a democratic check to be strikingly limited: only a small fraction of Americans prioritize democratic principles in their electoral choices, and their tendency to do so is decreasing in several measures of polarization, including the strength of partisanship, policy extremism, and candidate platform divergence. Our findings echo classic arguments about the importance of political moderation and cross-cutting cleavages for democratic stability and highlight the dangers that polarization represents for democracy.

  • View HTML

      • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Democracy in America? Partisanship, Polarization, and the Robustness of Support for Democracy in the United States
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Democracy in America? Partisanship, Polarization, and the Robustness of Support for Democracy in the United States
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Democracy in America? Partisanship, Polarization, and the Robustness of Support for Democracy in the United States
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

COPYRIGHT: © American Political Science Association 2020 

Corresponding author

*Matthew H. Graham, Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Political Science, Yale University, matthew.graham@yale.edu.
†Milan W. Svolik, Professor, Department of Political Science, Yale University, milan.svolik@yale.edu.

Footnotes

Hide All

We would like to thank Jacob Hacker, David Hendry, Greg Huber, Steven Levitsky, David Mayhew, Nolan McCarty, Adam Przeworski, Arturas Rozenas, Daniel Treisman, Bonnie Weir, and audiences at APSA, EPSA, Boston University, Caltech, Columbia, Georgetown, Harvard, IAS Toulouse, Peking University, Technical University of Munich, Texas A&M, UC Berkeley, UT Austin, Vanderbilt, and Yale for their helpful comments and conversations and Isaiah Affron and Lily Engbith for research assistance. This project was supported by the Institution for Social and Policy Studies and the Whitney and Betty MacMillan Center for International and Area Studies, both at Yale University. Replication files are available at the American Political Science Review Dataverse: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/EEARKA.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Abramowitz, Alan I., and Saunders, Kyle L.. 2008. “Is Polarization and Myth?” The Journal of Politics 70 (2): 542–55.
Ahlquist, John S., Ichino, Nahomi, Wittenberg, Jason, and Ziblatt, Daniel. 2018. “How Do Voters Perceive Changes to the Rules of the Game? Evidence from the 2014 Hungarian Elections.” Journal of Comparative Economics 46 (4): 906–19.10.1016/j.jce.2018.01.001
Almond, Gabriel A., and Verba, Sidney. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Ashworth, Scott, and Bueno de Mesquita, Ethan. 2009. “Elections with Platform and Valence Competition.” Games and Economic Behavior 67: 191–216.
Barber, Michael J., and McCarty, Nolan. 2015. Causes and Consequences of Polarization. In Solutions to Political Polarization in America, ed. Persily, Nathaniel. New York: Cambridge University Press, 15–58.
Bateman, David A. 2018. Disenfranchising Democracy: Constructing the Electorate in the United States, the United Kingdom, and France. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108556323
Becher, Michael, and Brouard, Sylvain. 2019. “Executive Accountability beyond Outcomes: Experimental Evidence on Public Evaluations of Powerful Prime Ministers.” Unpublished Manuscript, IAST Toulouse.
Bermeo, Nancy. 2003. Ordinary People in Extraordinary Times: The Citizenry and the Breakdown of Democracy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Bertrand, Marianne, Duflo, Esther, and Mullainathan, Sendhil. 2004. “How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 119 (1): 249–75.
Cameron, A. Colin, and Trivedi, Pravin K.. 2005. Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Carey, John M., Helmke, Gretchen, Nyhan, Brendan, Sanders, Mitchell, and Stokes, Susan. 2019. “Searching for Bright Lines in the Trump Presidency.” Perspectives on Politics 17 (3): 699–718.
Carey, John M., Clayton, Katherine P., Helmke, Gretchen, Nyhan, Brendan, Sanders, Mitchell, and Stokes, Susan C.. 2018. “Party, Policy, Democracy and Candidate Choice in U.S. Elections.” Report, Bright Line Watch.
Chen, Jowei, and Rodden, Jonathan. 2013. “Unintentional Gerrymandering: Political Geography and Electoral Bias in Legislatures.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 8 (3): 239–69.
Cho, Wendy K. Tam, and Liu, Yan Y.. 2016. “Toward a Talismanic Redistricting Tool: A Computational Method for Identifying Extreme Redistricting Plans.” Election Law Journal 15 (4): 351–66.
Clark, Tom S. 2009. “The Separation of Powers, Court Curbing, and Judicial Legitimacy.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (4): 971–89.
Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” Critical Review 18 (1–3): 1–74.
Dahl, Robert A. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Dahl, Robert A. 1961. Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dahl, Robert A., ed. 1966. Political Oppositions in Western Democracies. New Haven: Yal.
Eggers, Andrew C. 2014. “Partisanship and Electoral Accountability: Evidence from the UK Expenses Scandal.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 9 (4): 441–72.
Fiorina, Morris P., Abrams, Samuel A., and Pope, Jeremy C.. 2008. “Polarization in the American Public: Misconceptions and Misreadings.” The Journal of Politics 70 (2): 556–60.
Foa, Roberto Stefan, and Mounk, Yascha. 2017. “The Danger of Deconsolidation: The Democratic Disconnect.” The Danger of Deconsolidation: The Democratic Disconnect 27 (3): 5–17.
Gandhi, Jennifer, and Ong, Elvin. 2019. “Committed or Conditional Democrats? Opposition Dynamics in Electoral Autocracies.” American Journal of Political Science 63 (4): 948–63.
Gelman, Andrew. 2008. “Scaling Regression Inputs by Dividing by Two Standard Deviations.” Statistics in Medicine 27 (15): 2865–73.
Graham, Matthew, and Svolik, Milan W.. 2019. “Turnout as a Democratic Check?” Unpublished Manuscript, Yale University.
Grimmer, Justin, Hersh, Eitan, Meredith, Marc, Mummolo, Jonathan, and Nal, Clayton. 2018. “Obstacles to Estimating Voter ID Laws Effect on Turnout.” The Journal of Politics 80 (3): 1045–51.
Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert R.. 2016. Dictators and Democrats: Masses, Elites, and Regime Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hainmueller, Jens, Hopkins, Daniel J., and Yamamoto, Teppei. 2015. “Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multi-Dimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments.” Poltical Analysis 22 (1): 1–30.
Huq, Aziz Z., and Ginsburg, Tom. 2018. “How to Lose a Constitutional Democracy.” UCLA Law Review 65 (1): 78–169.
Inglehart, Ronald, and Welzel, Christian. 2010. “Changing Mass Priorities: The Link between Modernization and Democracy.” Perspectives on Politics 8 (2): 551–67.
Iyengar, Shanto, Lelkes, Yphtach, Levendusky, Matthew, Malhotra, Neil, and Westwood, Sean J.. 2018. “The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States Affective Polarization: An Outgrowth of Partisan Social Identity.” Annual Review of Political Science 22: 129–46.
Kaufman, Robert R., and Haggard, Stephan. 2019. “Democratic Decline in the United States: What Can We Learn from Middle-Income Backsliding?” Perspectives on Politics 17 (2): 417–32.
Leeper, Thomas J., Hobolt, Sara B., and Tilley, James. Forthcoming. “Measuring Subgroup Preferences in Conjoint Experiments.” Political Analysis.
Levitsky, Steven, and Ziblatt, Daniel. 2018. How Democracies Die. New York: Crown.
Levitsky, Steven, and Way, Lucan A.. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lieberman, Robert C., Mettler, Suzanne, Pepinsky, Thomas B., Roberts, Kenneth M., and Valelly, Richard. 2019. “The Trump Presidency and American Democracy: A Historical and Comparative Analysis.” Perspectives on Politics 17 (2): 470–9.
Lipset, Seymour M. 1960. Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Luo, Zhaotian, and Przeworski, Adam. 2018. “Subversion by Stealth: Dynamics of Democratic Backsliding.” Unpublished Manuscript, New York University.
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2008. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McCoy, Jennifer, and Somer, Murat. 2019. “Polarizing Polities: A Global Threat to Democracy.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 681: 1–273.
Mickey, Robert. 2015. Paths Out of Dixie: The Democratization of Authoritarian Enclaves in America’s Deep South, 1944–1972. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Miller, Michael K., Szakonyi, David, and Morgenbesser, Lee. 2017. Authoritarian Warning Survey.
Nalepa, Monika, Vanberg, Georg, and Chiopris, Caterina. 2018. “Authoritarian Backsliding.” Unpublished Manuscript, University of Chicago and Duke University.
Norris, Pippa. 2011. Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Przeworski, Adam. 2019. Crises of Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Schedler, Andreas. 2002. “The Menu of Manipulation.” Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 36–50.
Svolik, Milan. 2019. “Polarization vs. Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 30 (3): 20–32.
Svolik, Milan W. 2020. “When Polarization Trumps Civic Virtue: Partisan Conflict and the Subversion of Democracy by Incumbents.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 15 (1): 3–31.
Treier, Shawn, and Hillygus, D. Sunshine. 2009. “The Nature of Political Ideology in the Contemporary Electorate.” Public Opinion Quarterly 73 (4): 679–703.
Voeten, Erik. 2017. “Are People Really Turning Away from Democracy?” Journal of Democracy Web Exchange: 1–16.
Waldner, David, and Lust, Ellen. 2018. “Unwelcome Change: Coming to Terms with Democratic Backsliding.” Annual Review of Political Science 21: 93–113.
Weingast, Barry R. 1997. “The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law.” American Political Science Review 91 (2): 245–63.
Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Graham and Svolik Dataset
Dataset

 Unknown
PDF
Supplementary data

Graham and Svolik supplementary material
Supplementary Appendix

 PDF (5.4 MB)
5.4 MB
  • Cited by 8

  • Access

Democracy in America? Partisanship, Polarization, and the Robustness of Support for Democracy in the United States

  • MATTHEW H. GRAHAM (a1) and MILAN W. SVOLIK (a1)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.