Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Competition Between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success

  • BONNIE M. MEGUID (a1)
Abstract

What accounts for variation in the electoral success of niche parties? Although institutional and sociological explanations of single-issue party strength have been dominant, they tend to remove parties from the analysis. In this article, I argue that the behavior of mainstream parties influences the electoral fortunes of the new, niche party actors. In contrast to standard spatial theories, my theory recognizes that party tactics work by altering the salience and ownership of issues for political competition, not just party issue positions. It follows that niche party support can be shaped by both proximal and non-proximal competitors. Analysis of green and radical right party vote in 17 Western European countries from 1970 to 2000 confirms that mainstream party strategies matter; the modified spatial theory accounts for the failure and success of niche parties across countries and over time better than institutional, sociological, and even standard spatial explanations.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Bonnie M. Meguid is Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627. (bonnie.meguid@rochester.edu).
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Amorim NetoOctavio, and GaryCox. 1997. “Electoral Institutions, Cleavage Structures and the Number of Parties.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (January): 14974.

BeckNathaniel, and Jonathan N.Katz. 1995. “What to Do (And Not to Do) with Time-Series-Cross-Section Data.” American Political Science Review 89 (September): 63447.

BeckNathaniel, and Jonathan N.Katz. 1996. “Nuisance vs. Substance: Specifying and Estimating Time-Series-Cross-Section Models.” Political Analysis 6: 136.

BélangerEric. 2003. “Issue Ownership by Canadian Political Parties since 1953.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 36 (July/August): 53958.

BudgeIan, DavidRobertson, and DerekHearl. 1987. Ideology, Strategy and Party Change: Spatial Analyses of Post-War Election Programmes in 19 Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

BürklinWilhelm. 1987. “Governing Left Parties Frustrating the Radical Non-established Left: The Rise and Inevitable Decline of the Greens.” European Sociological Review 3 (September): 10926.

CaramaniDaniele. 2000. Elections in Western Europe Since 1815. New York: Macmillan.

CastlesFrancis G., and PeterMair. 1984. “Left-Right Political Scales: Some “Expert” Judgments.” European Journal of Political Research 12 (March): 7388.

GolderMatt. 2003. “Explaining Variation in the Success of Extreme Right Parties in Western Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 36 (May): 43266.

HarmelRobert, and JohnRobertson. 1985. “Formation and Success of New Parties: A Cross-National Analysis.” International Political Science Review 6 (October): 50123.

HarmelRobert, and LarsSvasand. 1997. “The Influences of New Parties on Old Parties' Platforms.” Party Politics 3 (3): 31540.

JackmanRobert W., and KarinVolpert. 1996. “Conditions Favouring Parties of the Extreme Right in Western Europe.” British Journal of Political Science 26 (October): 50121.

KitscheltHerbert. 1994. The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

LaverMichael, and JohnGarry. 2000. “Estimating Policy Positions from Political Texts.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (July): 61934.

PetrocikJohn. 1996. “Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (August): 82550.

RabinowitzGeorge, and Stuart ElaineMacdonald. 1989. “A Directional Theory of Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review 83 (March): 93121.

RohrschneiderRobert. 1993. “New Party Versus Old Left Realignments: Environmental Attitudes, Party Politics and Partisan Affiliations in Four Western European Countries.” Journal of Politics 55 (August): 682701.

SwankDuane, and Hans-GeorgBetz. 2003. “Globalization, the Welfare State and Right-Wing Populism in Western Europe.” Socio-Economic Review 1 (May): 21545.

TaggartPaul. 1996. The New Populism and the New Politics. New York: St Martin's Press.

WilleyJoseph. 1998. “Institutional Arrangements and the Success of New Parties in Old Democracies.” Political Studies 46 (3): 65168.

WoldendorpJaap, HansKeman, and IanBudge. 1998. “Party Government in 20 Democracies: An Update (1990–1995).” European Journal of Political Research 33 (1): 12564.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 45
Total number of PDF views: 573 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1380 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th March 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.