Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Do Politicians Use Policy to Make Politics? The Case of Public-Sector Labor Laws

  • SARAH F. ANZIA (a1) and TERRY M. MOE (a2)
Abstract

Schattschneider's insight that “policies make politics” has played an influential role in the modern study of political institutions and public policy. Yet if policies do indeed make politics, rational politicians have opportunities to use policies to structure future politics to their own advantage—and this strategic dimension has gone almost entirely unexplored. Do politicians actually use policies to make politics? Under what conditions? In this article, we develop a theoretical argument about what can be expected from strategic politicians, and we carry out an empirical analysis on a policy development that is particularly instructive: the adoption of public-sector collective bargaining laws by the states during the 1960s, 1970s, and early 1980s—laws that fueled the rise of public-sector unions, and “made politics” to the advantage of Democrats over Republicans.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Sarah F. Anzia is Assistant Professor, Goldman School of Public Policy, University of California, Berkeley, 2607 Hearst Avenue, Berkeley, CA 94720 (sanzia@berkeley.edu).
Terry M. Moe is Professor, Department of Political Science, Stanford University, 616 Serra Street, Encina Hall West, Room 100, Stanford, CA 94305–6044 (tmoe@stanford.edu).
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Sarah F. Anzia , and Terry M. Moe . 2015. “Public Sector Unions and the Costs of Government.” Journal of Politics 77 (1): 114–27.

Kathleen Bawn , Martin Cohen , David Karol , Seth Masket , Hans Noel , and John Zaller . 2012. “A Theory of Political Parties: Groups, Policy Demands and Nominations in American Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 10 (3): 571–97.

Andrea Louise Campbell . 2003. How Policies Make Citizens: Senior Political Activism and the American Welfare State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Marty Cohen , David Karol , Hans Noel , and John Zaller . 2008. The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Gary W. Cox , and Mathew D. McCubbins . 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Patrick Flavin , and Michael Hartney . 2015. “When Government Subsidizes its Own: Collective Bargaining Laws as Agents of Political Mobilization.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (4): 896911.

Michael Goldfield . 1989–90. “Public Sector Union Growth and Public Policy.” Policy Studies Journal 18 (2): 404–20.

Jacob S. Hacker , and Paul Pierson . 2014. “After the ‘Master Theory’: Downs, Schattschneider, and the Rebirth of Policy-Focused Analysis.” Perspectives on Politics 12 (3): 643–62.

Jeffrey A. Jenkins , and Nathan W. Monroe . 2012. “Buying Negative Agenda Control in the U.S. House.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (4): 897912.

Joseph A. McCartin 2006. “Bringing the State's Workers In: Time to Rectify an Imbalanced US Labor Historiography.” Labor History 47 (1): 7394.

Joseph A. McCartin 2008. “‘A Wagner Act for Public Employees’: Labor's Deferred Dream and the Rise of Conservatism, 1970-1976.” Journal of American History 95 (1): 123–48.

Suzanne Mettler , and Joe Soss . 2004. “The Consequences of Public Policy for Democratic Citizenship: Bridging Policy Studies and Mass Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 2 (1): 5573.

Terry M. Moe 2006. “Political Control and the Power of the Agent.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 22 (1): 129.

Jonathan Oberlander , and R. Kent Weaver . 2015. “Unraveling from Within? The Affordable Care Act and Self-Undermining Policy Feedbacks.” The Forum 13 (1): 3762.

Eric M. Patashnik , and Julian E. Zelizer . 2013. “The Struggle to Remake Politics: Liberal Reform and the Limits of Policy Feedback in the Contemporary American State.” Perspectives on Politics 11 (4): 1071–87.

Paul Pierson . 1993. “When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change.” World Politics 45 (4): 595628.

David W. Rohde 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Gregory M. Saltzman 1985. “Bargaining Laws as a Cause and Consequence of the Growth of Teacher Unionism.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 38 (3): 335–51.

Robert Shaffer . 2002. “Where Are the Organized Public Employees? The Absence of Public Employee Unionism from U.S. History Textbooks, and Why It Matters.” Labor History 43 (3): 315–34.

Boris Shor , and Nolan McCarty . 2011. “The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures.” American Political Science Review 105 (3): 530–51.

Alexis N. Walker 2014. “Labor's Enduring Divide: The Distinct Path of Public Sector Unions in the United States.” Studies in American Political Development 28 (2): 175200.

Barry Weingast , and William J. Marshall . 1988. “The Industrial Organization of Congress; or, Why Legislatures, Like Firms, Are Not Organized As Markets.” Journal of Political Economy 96 (1): 132–63.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary Materials

Anzia and Moe supplementary material
Anzia and Moe supplementary material 1

 PDF (183 KB)
183 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 20
Total number of PDF views: 297 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 450 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 28th December 2016 - 22nd July 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.