Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

The Democratic Effect of Direct Democracy


A key requirement of democratic governance is that policy outcomes and the majority preference of the electorate are congruent. Many studies argue that the more direct democratic a system is, the more often voters get what they want, but the empirical evidence is mixed. This analysis explores the democratic effect of initiatives and referendums theoretically and empirically. The prediction of the formal model is that “bad” representation (i.e., a large preference deviation between the electorate and the political elite) is good for the democratic effect of direct democracy. An empirical investigation of original voter and elite survey data, analyzed with multilevel modeling and poststratification, supports this argument. Building on the literature, the findings of the analysis suggest that the extent to which direct democratic institutions are conducive for policy congruence—and may thus be advisable as democratic correctives to representative systems—depends on the political conflict structure.

Corresponding author
Lucas Leemann is Lecturer, Department of Political Science, University College London, United Kingdom ( URL:
Fabio Wasserfallen is Assistant Professor, University of Salzburg, Austria & Senior Research Associate, University of Zurich, Switzerland ( URL:
Hide All
Achen, ChristopherH. 1978. “Measuring Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 22 (3): 475510.
AngristJoshua D., and Pischke Jörn-Steffen. 2008. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
BesleyTimothy, and Coate Stephen. 2008. “Issue Unbundling via Citizens’ Initiatives.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 3 (4): 379–97.
BfS. 2012. Swiss Census Data (2000 Census). Neuchâtel: Swiss Federal Statistical Office.
BfS. 2013. Statistik der Nationalratswahlen (Election Results for the Lower Chamber). Neuchâtel: Swiss Federal Statistical Office.
BochslerDaniel, and Bousbah Karima. 2015. “Competitive Consensus: What Comes After Consociationalism in Switzerland?Swiss Political Science Review 21 (4): 654–79.
BramborThomas, Clark William Roberts, and Golder Matt. 2006. “Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses.” Political Analysis 14 (1): 6382.
BroderDavid S. 2000. Democracy Derailed. New York: Harcourt.
DahlRobert A. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
EriksonRobert S., Wright Gerald C., and McIver John P.. 1993. Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
FeldLars P., and Kirchgässner Gebhard. 2000. “Direct Democracy, Political Culture, and the Outcome of Economic Policy: A Report on the Swiss Experience.” European Journal of Political Economy 16 (2): 287306.
FreitagMarkus, and Vatter Adrian. 2006. “Initiatives, Referendums, and the Tax State.” Journal of European Public Policy 13 (1): 89112.
FreyBruno S., and Stutzer Alois. 2000. “Happiness, Economy and Institutions.” The Economic Journal 110 (466): 918–38.
GelmanAndrew, and Hill Jennifer. 2007. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
GelmanAndrew, and Little Thomas C.. 1997. “Poststratification Into Many Categories Using Hierarchical Logistic Regression.” Survey Methodology 23 (2): 127–35.
GerberElisabeth R. 1996. “Legislative Response to the Threat of Popular Initiatives.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (1): 99128.
GerberElisabeth R. 1999. The Populist Paradox: Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Legislation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
GerberElisabeth R., Lupia Arthur, McCubbins Mathew D., and Kiewiet Roderick D.. 2000. Stealing the Initiative: How State Government Responds to Direct Democracy. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.
GolderMatt, and Stramski Jacek. 2010. “Ideological Congruence and Electoral Institutions.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (1): 90106.
HeldDavid. 1996. Models of Democracy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
HerronMichael C. 1999. “Postestimation Uncertainty in Limited Dependent Variable Models.” Political Analysis 8 (1): 8398.
HugSimon. 2004. “Occurrence and Policy Consequences of Referendums. A Theoretical Model and Empirical Evidence.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 16 (3): 321–56.
HugSimon. 2009. “Some Thoughts About Referendums, Representative Democracy, and Separation of Powers.” Constitutional Political Economy 20 (3/4): 251–66.
HugSimon. 2011. “Policy Consequences of Direct Legislation Theory, Empirical Models and Evidence.” Quality & Quantity 45: 559–78.
KaissStephanie. 2010. Das Verhältnis zwischen Exekutive und Legislative in den Schweizer Kantonen – Das Ausmass der Exekutivdominanz auf kantonaler Ebene. Zurich: University of Zurich.
KastellecJonathan P., Lax Jeffrey R., and Phillips Justin H.. 2010. “Public Opinion and Senate Confirmation of Supreme Court Nominees.” Journal of Politics 72 (3): 767–84.
KitscheltHerbert, and Rehm Philipp. 2014. “Occupations as a Site of Political Preference Formation.” Comparative Political Studies 47 (12): 1670–706.
KriesiHanspeter. 2005. Direct Democratic Choice. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
KriesiHanspeter, Grande Edgar, Lachat Romain, Dolezal Martin, Bornschier Simon, and Frey Timotheos. 2008. West European Politics in the Age of Glabalization. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
LascherEdward L., Hagen Michael G., and Rochlin Steven A.. 1996. “Gun Behind the Door? Ballot Initiatives, State Policies and Public Opinion.” Journal of Politics 58 (3): 760–75.
LaxJeffrey R., and Phillips Justin H.. 2009a. “Gay Rights in the States: Public Opinion and Policy Responsiveness.” American Political Science Review 103 (3): 367–86.
LaxJeffrey R., and Phillips Justin H.. 2009b. “How Should We Estimate Public Opinion in The States?American Journal of Political Science 53 (1): 107–21.
LaxJeffrey R., and Phillips Justin H.. 2012. “The Democratic Deficit in the States.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (1): 148–66.
LeemannLucas. 2014. Origins of Direct Democracy and Cleavage Structure. Chapter 1, Ph.D. thesis. Columbia University.
LeemannLucas. 2015. “Political Conflict and Direct Democracy – Initiative Use 1920–2011.” Swiss Political Science Review 21 (4): 596616.
LevenduskyMatthew S., Pope Jeremy C., and Jackman Simon D.. 2008. “Measuring District-Level Partisanship with Implications for the Analysis of U.S. elections.” Journal of Politics 70 (3): 736–53.
LewisJeffrey B., and Linzer Drew A.. 2005. “Estimating Regression Models in Which the Dependent Variable Is Based on Estimates.” Political Analysis 13 (4): 345–64.
LupiaArthur. 1992. “Busy Voters, Agenda Control, and the Power of Information.” American Political Science Review 86 (2): 390403.
MansbridgeJane. 2009. “A “Selection Model” of Political Representation.” Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (4): 369–98.
MatsusakaJohn G. 1995. “Fiscal Effects of the Voter Initiative: Evidence from the Last 30 Years.” Journal of Political Economy 103 (3): 587623.
MatsusakaJohn G. 2001. “Problems with a Methodology Used to Evaluate the Voter Initiative.” Journal of Politics 63 (4): 1250–56.
MatsusakaJohn G. 2004. For the Many or the Few. How the Initiative Process Changes American Government. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
MatsusakaJohn G. 2005. “Direct Democracy Works.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (2): 185206.
MatsusakaJohn G. 2010. “Popular Control of Public Policy: A Quantitative Approach.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 5: 133–67.
MatsusakaJohn G., and McCarthy Nolan M.. 2001. “Political Resource Allocation: Benefits and Costs of Voter Initiatives.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 17 (2): 413–48.
McCartyNolan, Poole Keith T., and Rosenthal Howard. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
MillerWarren E., and Stokes Donald W.. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review 57 (1): 45–6.
PachecoJulianna. 2012. “The Social Contagion Model: Exploring the Role of Public Opinion on the Diffusion of Antismoking Legislation across the American States.” Journal of Politics 74 (1): 187202.
ParkDavid K., Gelman Andrew, and Bafumi Joseph. 2004. “Bayesian Multilevel Estimation with Poststratification: State-Level Estimates from National Polls.” Political Analysis 12 (4): 375–85.
RomerThomas, and Rosenthal Howard. 1978. “Political Resource Allocation, Controlled Agendas, and the Status Quo.” Public Choice 33 (4): 2743.
RomerThomas, and Rosenthal Howard. 1979. “Bureaucrats versus Voters: On the Political Economy of Resource Allocation by Direct Democracy.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 93 (4): 561–87.
SchumpeterJoseph A. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism, & Democracy. New York: Harper.
Stadelmann-SteffenIsabelle, and Freitag Markus. 2011. “Making Civil Society Work: Models of Democracy and Their Impact on Civic Engagement.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 40 (3): 526–51.
Stadelmann-SteffenIsabelle, and Vatter Adrian. 2011. “Does Satisfaction with Democracy Really Increase Happiness? Direct Democracy and Individual Satisfaction in Switzerland.” Political Behavior 34 (3): 535–59.
SteenbergenMarco R., and Jones Bradford S.. 2002. “Modeling Multilevel Data Structures.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 218–37.
StockJames H., Wright Jonathan H., and Yogo Motohiro. 2002. “A Survey of Weak Instruments and Weak Identification in Generalized Method of Moments.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 20 (4): 518–29.
StreunenbergBernard. 1992. “Referendum, Initiative, and Veto Power: Budgetary Decision Making in Local Government.” Kyklos 45 (4): 501–29.
StutzerAlois. 1999. “Demokratieindizes für die Kantone der Schweiz.” Working Paper No. 23, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich.
TausanovitchChris, and Warshaw Christopher. 2013. “Measuring Constituent Policy Preferences in Congress, State Legislatures, and Cities.” Journal of Politics 75 (2): 330–42.
TausanovitchChris, and Warshaw Christopher. 2014. “Representation in Municipal Government.” American Political Science Review 108 (3): 605–41.
TsaiTsung-han, and Gill Jeff. 2013. “Interactions in Generalized Linear Models: Theoretical Issues and an Application to Personal Vote-Earning Attributes.” Social Sciences 2 (2): 91113.
VatterAdrian. 2002. Kantonale Demokratien im Vergleich. Entstehungsgründe, Interaktionen und Wirkungen politischer Institutionen in den Schweizer Kantonen. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.
WarshawChristopher, and Rodden Jontahan. 2012. “How Should We Measure District-Level Public Opinion on Individual Issues?Journal of Politics 74 (1): 203–19.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary Materials

Leemann and Wasserfallen supplementary materials
Leemann and Wasserfallen supplementary materials

 PDF (939 KB)
939 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 59
Total number of PDF views: 769 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1669 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 21st November 2016 - 21st October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.