Skip to main content
×
Home

Will vs. Reason: The Populist and Technocratic Forms of Political Representation and Their Critique to Party Government

  • DANIELE CARAMANI (a1)
Abstract

The article compares analytically populism and technocracy as alternative forms of political representation to party government. It argues that populist and technocratic principles of representation challenge fundamental features of party democracy. The two alternative forms of representation are addressed theoretically from the perspective of political representation. First, the article identifies the commonalities between the two forms of representation: both populism and technocracy are based on a unitary, nonpluralist, unmediated, and unaccountable vision of society's general interest. Second, it highlights their differences. Technocracy stresses responsibility and requires voters to entrust authority to experts who identify the general interest from rational speculation. Populism stresses responsiveness and requires voters to delegate authority to leaders who equate the general interest with a putative will of the people. While the populist form of representation has received considerable attention, the technocratic one has been neglected. The article presents a more complete picture of the analytical relationship between them.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Daniele Caramani, Professor of Comparative Politics, Department of Political Science, University of Zurich (daniele.caramani@uzh.ch).
Footnotes
Hide All
Research has been supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (National Centre for Competence in Research “Democracy in the 21st Century”). For comments on early versions of the article I am particularly grateful to Carlo Invernizzi Accetti, Christopher Bickerton, Ingrid van Biezen, Francis Cheneval, Astrid Séville, Jonathan White, and Lea Ypi. The article has also profited very substantially from the suggestions of the anonymous reviewers and the editors of the journal.
Footnotes
References
Hide All
Albertazzi Daniele and McDonnell Duncan eds. 2008. Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Almond Gabriel A., and Powell Bingham G. Jr. 1966. Comparative Politics: A Developmental Approach. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co.
Anderson Benedict. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
Andeweg Rudy B. 2011. Approaching Perfect Policy Congruence: Measurement, Development, and Relevance for Political Representation. In How Democracy Works: Political Representation and Policy Congruence in Modern Societies, eds. Rosema Martin, Denters Bas, and Aarts Kees. Amsterdam: Pallas Publications, 39−52.
APSA. 1950. “Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System.” American Political Science Review 44 (3): 303−6.
Bardi Luciano, Bartolini Stefano, and Trechsel Alexander H.. 2014a. “Responsive and Responsible? The Role of Parties in Twenty-First Century Politics.” West European Politics 37 (2): 235−52.
Bardi Luciano, Bartolini Stefano, and Trechsel Alexander H., eds. 2014b. “Party Adaptation and Change and the Crisis of Democracy: Essays in Honour of Peter Mair.” Party Politics 20 (2): 151−236.
Bauböck Reiner. 2005. “Expansive Citizenship: Voting beyond Territory and Membership.” PS: Political Science and Politics 38 (4): 683−87.
Bendix Reinhard. 1964. Nation-Building and Citizenship: Studies of Our Changing Social Order. New York: Wiley.
Betz Hans-Georg. 1994. Radical Right-Wing Populism in Western Europe. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Bickerton Christopher, and Accetti Carlo Invernizzi. 2015. “Populism and Technocracy: Opposites or Complements?Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. Published online: DOI: 10.1080/13698230.2014.995504.
Birch Anthony H. 1964. Representative and Responsible Government: An Essay on the British Constitution. London: Allen and Unwin.
Canovan Margaret. 1999. Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy. Political Studies 47 (1): 216.
Caramani Daniele. 2004. The Nationalization of Politics: The Formation of National Electorates and Party Systems in Western Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Centeno Miguel Ángel. 1993. “The New Leviathan: The Dynamics and Limits of Technocracy.” Theory and Society 22 (3): 307−35.
Centeno Miguel Ángel. 1994. Democracy within Reason: Technocratic Revolution in Mexico. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Centeno Miguel Ángel, and Silva Patricio, eds. 1998. The Politics of Expertise in Latin America. New York: Macmillan.
Connor Walker. 1994. Ethnonationalism: The Quest for Understanding. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Converse Philip E., and Pierce Roy. 1986. Political Representation in France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Crouch Colin. 2011. The Strange Non-Death of Neoliberalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Culpepper Pepper D. 2014. “The Political Economy of Unmediated Democracy: Italian Austerity under Mario Monti.” West European Politics 37 (6): 1264−81.
Dahl Robert A. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Dahl Robert A. 1985. Controlling Nuclear Weapons: Democracy versus Guardianship. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
Dargent Eduardo. 2015. Technocracy and Democracy in Latin America: The Experts Running Government. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Deutsch Karl W. 1966. The Nerves of Government: Models of Political Communication and Control. New York: Free Press.
Downs Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
Esser Frank. 2013. Mediatization as a Challenge: Media Logic versus Political Logic. In Democracy in the Age of Globalization and Mediatization, eds. Kriesi Hanspeter et al. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 155−76.
Fischer Frank. 1990. Technocracy and the Politics of Expertise. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Fischer Frank. 2009. Democracy and Expertise. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gellner Ernest. 1983. Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Golder Matt, and Stramski Jacek. 2010. “Ideological Congruence and Electoral Institutions.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (1): 90106.
Hawkins Kirk A. 2010. Venezuela's Chavismo and Populism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hibbing John R., and Theiss-Morse Elizabeth. 2002. Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs about How Government Should Work. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hicks John D. 1931. The Populist Revolt: A History of the Crusade for Farm Relief. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Hobsbawn Eric. 1983. Inventing Traditions. In The Invention of Tradition, eds. Hobsbawm Eric and Ranger Terence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 1−14.
Hooghe Liesbet, and Marks Gary. 2003. “Unraveling the Central State, But How? Types of Multi-Level Governance.” American Political Science Review 97 (2): 233−43.
Horowitz Donald L. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Jagers Jan, and Walgrave Stefaan. 2007. “Populism as Political Communication Style.” European Journal of Political Research 46 (3): 319−45.
Kantorowicz Ernst H. 1957. The King's Two Bodies: A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Katz Richard S. 2014. “No Man Can Serve Two Masters: Party Politicians, Party Members, Citizens and Principal-Agent Models of Democracy.” Party Politics 20 (2): 183−93.
Katz Richard S., and Mair Peter. 1995. “Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party.” Party Politics 1 (1): 528.
Kenneally Ivan. 2009. “Technocracy and Populism.” The New Atlantis 24: 4660.
Kitschelt Herbert. 1995. The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Kohler-Koch Beate, and Rittberger Berthold. 2006. “The ‘Governance Turn’ in EU Studies.” Journal of Common Market Studies 44 (annual review): 2749.
Krämer Benjamin. 2014. “Media Populism: A Conceptual Clarification and Some Theses on Its Effects.” Communication Theory 24 (1): 4260.
Kriesi Hanspeter. 2014. “The Populist Challenge.” West European Politics 37 (2): 361−78.
Kriesi Hanspeter, Grande Edgar, Dolezal Martin, Helbling Marc, Höglinger Dominic, Hutter Swen, and Wüest Bruno. 2012. Political Conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Levitsky Steven, and Loxton James. 2013. “Populism and Competitive Authoritarianism in the Andes.” Democratization 20 (1): 107−36.
Levitsky Steven, and Roberts Kenneth M.. 2011. Latin America's “Left Turn”: A Framework for Analysis. In The Resurgence of the Latin American Left, eds. Levitsky Steven and Roberts Kenneth M.. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. 1–28.
Lijphart Arend. 1977. Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. New Haven, CT.: Yale University Press.
Lijphart Arend. 2012. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries, second edition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
McDonnell Duncan, and Valbruzzi Marco. 2014. “Defining and Classifying Technocrat-Led and Technocratic Governments.” European Journal of Political Research 53 (4): 654−71.
Mair Peter. 2002. Populist Democracy vs. Party Democracy. In Democracies and the Populist Challenge, eds. Mény Yves and Surel Yves. London: Palgrave, 81–98.
Mair Peter. 2009. Representative versus Responsible Government. Cologne: MplfG Working Paper 09/8.
Majone Giandomenico. 1994. “The rise of the Regulatory State in Europe.” West European Politics 17 (3): 77101.
Manin Bernard. 1997. The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Mann Michael. 1993. The Sources of Social Power (two volumes). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Mansbridge Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes’.” Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628‒57.
Mansbridge Jane. 2003. “Rethinking Representation.” American Political Science Review 97 (4): 515‒28.
Mansbridge Jane. 2011. “Clarifying the Concept of Representation.” American Political Science Review 105 (3): 621‒30.
Mazzoleni Gianpietro, Stewart Julianne, and Horsfield Bruce, eds. 2003. The Media and Neo-Populism: A Contemporary Comparative Analysis. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Mény Yves, and Surel Yves, eds. 2002. Democracies and the Populist Challenge. London: Palgrave.
Meynaud Jean. 1969. Technocracy. New York: The Free Press.
Michels Robert. 1999 (1911). Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Morgan Edmund S. 1988. Inventing the People: The Rise of Popular Sovereignty in England and America. New York: Norton.
Mudde Cas. 2004. “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition 39 (4): 541−63.
Mudde Cas. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mudde Cas, and Kaltwasser Cristóbal R., eds. 2012. Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
O'Donnell Guillermo A. 1994. “Delegative Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 5 (1): 5569.
Ostrogorski Moisei Y. 1902. Democracy and the Organization of Political Parties (two volumes). London: Macmillan.
Pasquino Gianfranco, and Valbruzzi Marco. 2012. “Non-Partisan Government Italian-Style: Decision-Making and Accountability.” Journal of Modern Italian Studies 17 (5): 612−29.
Phillips Anne. 1998. The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pierce Roy. 1999. Mass-Elite Issue Linkages and the Responsible Party Model of Representation. In Policy Representation in Western Democracies, eds. Miller Warren E., Pierce Roy, Thomassen Jacques, Herrera Richard, Holmberg Sören, Esaiasson Peter, and Wessels Bernhard. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 932.
Pitkin Hanna F. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: The University of California Press.
Powell Bingham G. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Rehfeld Andrew. 2009. “Representation Rethought: On Trustees, Delegates, and Gyroscopes in the Study of Political Representation and Democracy.” American Political Science Review 103 (2): 214‒30.
Rehfeld Andrew. 2011. “The Concepts of Representation.” American Political Science Review 105 (3): 631‒41.
Riker William H. 1982. Liberalism against Populism: A Confrontation between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
Rokkan Stein. 1970. Citizens, Elections, Parties: Approaches to the Comparative Study of the Processes of Development. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Rosanvallon Pierre. 2011. Democratic Legitimacy: Impartiality, Reflexivity, Proximity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rosenblum Nancy L. 2008. On the Side of the Angels: An Appreciation of Parties and Partisanship. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sartori Giovanni. 1968. Representation Systems. In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 13. New York: Macmillan 465–74.
Sartori Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Saward Michael. 2010. The Representative Claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scharpf Fritz W. 1999. Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schattschneider Elmer E. 1942. Party Government: American Government in Action. New York: Rhinehart and company.
Schmidt Vivien. 2011. “Can Technocratic Government Be Democratic?Telos 23.
Schumpeter Josef A. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
Smith Anthony. 1986. The Ethnic Origins of Nations. Oxford: Blackwell.
Stolle Dietlind, and Micheletti Michele. 2013. Political Consumerism: Global Responsibility in Action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Torre Carlos de la. 2013. “Technocratic Populism in Ecuador.” Journal of Democracy 24 (3): 3346.
Urbinati Nadia. 1998. “Democracy and Populism.” Constellations 5 (1): 110‒24.
Urbinati Nadia. 2006. Representative Democracy: Principles and Genealogy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Urbinati Nadia. 2014. The Populist Phenomenon. Paper presented at the Political Theory Workshop, University of Chicago.
Weyland Kurt. 2001. “Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics.” Comparative Politics 34 (1): 122.
Williams Conor. 2010. “Technocracy and Populism.” Dissent 22. https://www.dissentmagazine.org/online_articles/technocracy-and-populism
Williams Melissa S. 1998. Voice, Trust, and Memory: Marginalized Groups and the Failings of Liberal Representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Williamson Vanessa, Skocpol Theda, and Coggin John. 2011. “The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism.” Perspectives on Politics 9 (1): 2543.
Voltmer Katrin. 2012. The Media in Transitional Democracies. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Young Iris M. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 58
Total number of PDF views: 987 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 3414 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 24th February 2017 - 12th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.