Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T12:03:18.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does Collective Identity Presuppose an Other? On the Alleged Incoherence of Global Solidarity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2005

ARASH ABIZADEH
ARASH ABIZADEH
Affiliation:
McGill University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two arguments apparently support the thesis that collective identity presupposes an Other: the recognition argument, according to which seeing myself as a self requires recognition by an other whom I also recognize as a self (Hegel); and the dialogic argument, according to which my sense of self can only develop dialogically (Taylor). But applying these arguments to collective identity involves a compositional fallacy. Two modern ideologies mask the particularist thesis's falsehood. The ideology of indivisible state sovereignty makes sovereignty as such appear particularistic by fusing “internal” with “external” sovereignty; nationalism imagines national identity as particularistic by linking it to sovereignty. But the concatenation of internal sovereignty, external sovereignty, and nation is contingent. Schmitt's thesis that “the political” presupposes an other conflates internal and external sovereignty, while Mouffe's neo-Schmittianism conflates difference (Derrida) with alterity. A shared global identity may face many obstacles, but metaphysical impossibility and conceptual confusion are not among them.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 99 , Issue 1 , February 2005 , pp. 45 - 60
Copyright
© 2005 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson Benedict. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Rev. ed. London: Verso.
Balakrishnan Gopal. 2000. The Enemy: An Intellectual Portrait of Carl Schmitt. London: Verso.
Brown Chris. 2001. “Borders and Identity in International Relations Theory.” In Identities, Borders, Orders: Rethinking International Relations Theory, ed. Mathias Albert, David Jacobson, and Yosef Lapid. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 117– 36.
Bull Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. New York: Macmillan and Columbia University Press.
Cohen Jean L. 1999. “Changing Paradigms of Citizenship and the Exclusiveness of the Demos.” International Sociology 14 (September): 245– 68.Google Scholar
Connolly William E. 1991. Identity\Difference: Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Derathé Robert. 1970. Jean-Jacques Rousseau et la science politique de son temps. 2nd ed. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.
Derrida Jacques. 1967. De la grammatologie. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.
Derrida Jacques. 1994. Politiques de l'amitié, suivi de L'oreille de Heidegger. Paris: Galilée.
Eriksen Thomas Hylland. 1995. “We and Us: Two Modes of Group Identification.” Journal of Peace Research 32 (November): 427– 36.Google Scholar
Fearon James D., and David D. Laitin. 2000. “Violence and the Social Construction of Ethnic Identity.” International Organization 54 (Autumn): 845– 77.Google Scholar
Giddens Anthony. 1987. The Nation-State and Violence: Volume Two of A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gilpin Robert G. 1986. “The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism.” In Neorealism and Its Critics, ed. Robert O. Keohane. New York: Columbia University Press.
Greenfeld Liah. 1992. Nationalism: Five Roads to Modernity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Habermas Jürgen. 1987. The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 2. Boston: Beacon Press.
Hegel Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1977. Phenomenology of Spirit, ed. J. N. Findlay. Trans. A. V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hegel Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1991. Elements of the Philosophy of Right, ed. Allen W. Wood. Trans. H. B. Nisbet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Held David. 1995. Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Hinsley F. H. 1986. Sovereignty. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hobbes Thomas. [1651] 1996. Leviathan, ed. Richard Tuck. Rev. student ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huntington Samuel P. 1996. The Clash of Civilizations: Remaking of World Order. New York: Touchstone.
Jaeggi Rahel. 2001. “Solidarity and Indifference.” In Solidarity in Health and Social Care in Europe, ed. Rudd Ter Meulen, Wil Arts, and Ruud Muffels. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer, 287– 308.
Jepperson Ronald L., Alexander Wendt, and Peter J. Katzenstein. 1996. “Norms, Identity, and Culture in National Security.” In The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, ed. Peter J. Katzenstein. New York: Columbia University Press, 33– 75.
Kant Immanuel. [1797] 1996. Metaphysics of Morals. In The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant: Practical Philosophy, ed. Mary J. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Krasner Stephen D. 1988. “Sovereignty: An Institutional Perspective.” Comparative Political Studies 21 (April): 66– 94.Google Scholar
Krasner Stephen D. 1995. “Compromising Westphalia.” International Security 20 (Winter): 115– 51.Google Scholar
Krasner Stephen D. 1999. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Laclau Ernesto. 1996. Emancipation(s). London: Verso.
Lefort Claude. 2000. “Nation et souveraineté.” Les Temps Modernes 55 (Septembre–Octobre–Novembre): 25– 46.Google Scholar
Mason Andrew. 2000. Community, Solidarity and Belonging. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mercer Jonathan. 1995. “Anarchy and Identity.” International Organization 49 (Spring): 229– 52.Google Scholar
Miller David. 1989a. “In What Sense Must Socialism Be Communitarian?” Social Philosophy & Policy 6 (Spring): 51– 73.Google Scholar
Miller David. 1989b. Market, State, and Community: Theoretical Foundations of Market Socialism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Mouffe Chantal. 1993. The Return of the Political. London: Verso.
Mouffe Chantal. 2000. The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.
Philpott Daniel. 1995. “Sovereignty: An Introduction and Brief History.” Journal of International Affairs 48 (Winter): 353– 68.Google Scholar
Rée Jonathan. 1998. “Cosmopolitanism and the Experience of Nationality.” In Cosmopolitics: Thinking and Feeling Beyond the Nation, ed. Pheng Cheah and Bruce Robbins. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 77– 90.
Ricoeur Paul. 1991. Lectures 1: Autour du politique. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
Riekmann Sonja Puntscher. 1997. “The Myth of European Unity.” In Myths and Nationhood, ed. Geoffrey Hosking and George Schöpflin. New York: Routledge, 60– 71.
Ruggie John Gerard. 1993. “Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations.” International Organization 47 (Winter): 139– 74.Google Scholar
Saussure Ferdinand de. 1960. Cours de linguistique générale, ed. Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye. 5th ed. Paris: Payot.
Schmitt Carl. 1922. Politische Theologie: Vier Kapitel zur Lehre von der Souveräntät. Munich: Duncker & Humbolt.
Schmitt Carl. 1985a. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Trans. George Schwab. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schmitt Carl. 1985b. The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy. Trans. Ellen Kennedy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schmitt Carl. 1987. Der Begriff des Politischen: Text von 1932 mit einem Vorwort und drei Corollarien. Berlin: Duncker & Humbolt.
Schmitt Carl. 1996. The Concept of the Political. Trans. George Schwab. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Schnapper Dominique. 1994. La Communauté des citoyens: Sur l'idée moderne de nation. Paris: Gallimard.
Smith Anthony D. 1990. “Towards a Global Culture?” Theory, Culture & Society 7 (June): 171– 91.Google Scholar
Smith Anthony D. 1992. “National Identity and the Idea of European Unity.” International Affairs 68 (January): 55– 76.Google Scholar
Spruyt Hendrik. 1994. “Institutional Selection in International Relations: State Anarchy as Order.” International Organization 48 (Autumn): 527– 57.Google Scholar
Taylor Charles. 1975. Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor Charles. 1994. “The Politics of Recognition.” In Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition, ed. Amy Gutmann. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Taylor Charles. 1998. “The Dynamics of Democratic Exclusion.” Journal of Democracy 9 (October): 143– 56.Google Scholar
Taylor Talbot J. 1992. Mutual Misunderstanding: Scepticism and the Theorizing of Language and Interpretation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Tuck Richard. 1989. Hobbes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Walker R. B. J. 1993. Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walzer Michael. 1992. “The New Tribalism: Notes on a Difficult Problem.” Dissent 39 (Spring): 164– 71.Google Scholar
Weber Eugene. 1976. Peasants into Frenchmen: The Modernization of Rural France, 1870–1914. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Wendt Alexander. 1992. “Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 46 (Spring): 391– 425.Google Scholar
Wendt Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wendt Alexander. 2003. “Why a World State Is Inevitable.” European Journal of International Relations 9 (December): 491– 542.Google Scholar
Wenman Mark Anthony. 2003. “What Is Politics? The Approach of Radical Pluralism.” Politics 23 (February): 57– 65.Google Scholar
Wood Allen. 1990. Hegel's Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.