Skip to main content Accessibility help

Elections, Coalitions, and Legislative Outcomes

  • David Austen-Smith (a1) and Jeffrey Banks (a1)


Predictions of electoral behavior in a multiparty setting should be a function of the voters' beliefs about how parties will perform following an election. Similarly, party behavior in a legislature should be a function of electoral promises and rewards. We develop a multistage game-theoretic model of three-party competition under proportional representation. The final policy outcome of the game is generated by a noncooperative bargaining game between the parties in the elected legislature. This game is essentially defined by the vote shares each party receives in the general election, and the parties' electoral policy positions. At the electoral stage parties and voters are strategic in that they take account of the legislative implications of any electoral outcome. We solve for equilibrium electoral positions by the parties and final policy outcomes.



Hide All
Austen-Smith, David. 1981. Party Policy and Campaign Costs in a Multiconstituency Model of Electoral Competition. Public Choice 37:389402.
Austen-Smith, David. 1983. The Spatial Theory of Electoral Competition: Instability, Institutions, and Information. Environment and Planning C 1:439–59.
Austen-Smith, David. 1984. Two-Party Competition with Many Constituencies. Mathematical Social Sciences 7:177–98.
Austen-Smith, David. 1986. Legislative Coalitions and Electoral Equilibrium. Public Choice 50:185210.
Austen-Smith, David. 1987. Sincere Voting in Models of Legislative Elections. Working Paper No. 637. California Institute of Technology.
Austen-Smith, David, and Banks, Jeffrey. 1987. Electoral Accountability and Incumbency. University of Rochester. Typescript.
Axelrod, Robert. 1970. Conflict of Interest. Chicago: Marham.
Calvert, Randall. 1985. Robustness of the Multidimensional Voting Model: Candidate Motivations, Uncertainty, and Convergence. American Journal of Political Science 29:6995.
Calvert, Randall. 1986. Models of Imperfect Information in Politics. London: Harwood Academic.
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
Enelow, James, and Hinich, Melvin. 1984. The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ferejohn, John and Krehbiel, Keith. 1987. Reconciliation and the Size of the Budget. American Journal of Political Science 31:296320.
Greenberg, Joseph, and Weber, Shlomo. 1985. Multiparty Equilibria under Proportional Representation. American Political Science Review 79:693703.
Greenberg, Joseph, and Shepsle, Kenneth. 1987. The Effect of Electoral Rewards in Multiparty Competition with Entry. American Political Science Review 81:525–39.
Inter-Parliamentary Union. 1986. Parliaments of the World: A Comparative Reference Compendium. 2d ed. Vol. 2. London: Gower.
McKelvey, Richard, Ordeshook, Peter, and Winer, Mark. 1978. The Competitive Solution for n-Person Games without Transferable Utility. American Political Science Review 72:599615.
Riker, William. 1962. The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Riker, William. 1982. The Two-Party System and Duverger's Law: An Essay on the History of Political Science. American Political Science Review 76:753–66.
Robertson, David. 1976. A Theory of Party Competition. London: Wiley.
Rubinstein, Ariel. 1982. Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model. Econometrica 50:97109.
Schofield, Norman. 1985. Bargaining in Weighted Majority Games, with an Application to Portfolio Distributions. California Institute of Technology. Typescript.
Shepsle, Kenneth. 1979. Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models. American Journal of Political Science 23:2759.
Shepsle, Kenneth. 1986. The Positive Theory of Legislative Institutions: An Enrichment of Social Choice and Spatial Models. Public Choice 50:135–78.
Sugden, Robert. 1984. Free Association and the Theory of Proportional Representation. American Political Science Review 78:3143.


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed