Ingham, Sean and Levin, Ines 2017. Effects of Deliberative Minipublics on Public Opinion: Experimental Evidence from a Survey on Social Security Reform. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, p. edw030.
Maier, Michaela Adam, Silke and Maier, Jürgen 2017. Does the messenger matter? A comparison of the effects of Eurosceptic messages communicated by mainstream and radical right-wing parties on citizens’ EU attitudes. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, p. 1.
Pleschberger, Werner 2017. Local Government and Urban Governance in Europe.
Andiappan, Meena and Dufour, Lucas 2016. Quick decisions tend to reinforce self-interest choices among MBA students: The direct and moderating effects of temporal constraint and situational factors in ethical decision making. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration,
Barrio, Astrid and Rodríguez-Teruel, Juan 2016. Reducing the gap between leaders and voters? Elite polarization, outbidding competition, and the rise of secessionism in Catalonia. Ethnic and Racial Studies, p. 1.
Careja, Romana 2016. Party Discourse and Prejudiced Attitudes toward Migrants in Western Europe at the Beginning of the 2000s. International Migration Review, Vol. 50, Issue. 3, p. 599.
Christenson, Dino P. and Kriner, Douglas L. 2016. Constitutional Qualms or Politics as Usual? The Factors Shaping Public Support for Unilateral Action. American Journal of Political Science,
Ciuk, David J. and Yost, Berwood A. 2016. The Effects of Issue Salience, Elite Influence, and Policy Content on Public Opinion. Political Communication, Vol. 33, Issue. 2, p. 328.
Clifford, Scott 2016. Individual Differences in Group Loyalty Predict Partisan Strength. Political Behavior,
Colombo, Céline and Kriesi, Hanspeter 2016. Party, policy – or both? Partisan-biased processing of policy arguments in direct democracy. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, p. 1.
Conroy-Krutz, Jeffrey Moehler, Devra C. and Aguilar, Rosario 2016. Partisan Cues and Vote Choice in New Multiparty Systems. Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 49, Issue. 1, p. 3.
Dickerson, Bradley 2016. Economic Perceptions, Presidential Approval, and Causality. American Politics Research, Vol. 44, Issue. 6, p. 1037.
Druckman, James N. and Lupia, Arthur 2016. Preference Change in Competitive Political Environments. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 19, Issue. 1, p. 13.
Garner, Andrew D. and Palmer, Harvey D. 2016. Following the Crowd or Thinking Outside of the Box? Saliency and Issue Consistency*. Social Science Quarterly, Vol. 97, Issue. 3, p. 603.
Harrison, Brian F. 2016. Bully Partisan or Partisan Bully?: Partisanship, Elite Polarization, and U.S. Presidential Communication*. Social Science Quarterly, Vol. 97, Issue. 2, p. 418.
Hellwig, Timothy and Kweon, Yesola 2016. Taking cues on multidimensional issues: the case of attitudes toward immigration. West European Politics, Vol. 39, Issue. 4, p. 710.
Karl, Kristyn L. and Ryan, Timothy J. 2016. When are Stereotypes about Black Candidates Applied? An Experimental Test. The Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics, Vol. 1, Issue. 02, p. 253.
Krupnikov, Yanna Piston, Spencer and Bauer, Nichole M. 2016. Saving Face: Identifying Voter Responses to Black Candidates and Female Candidates. Political Psychology, Vol. 37, Issue. 2, p. 253.
Lauderdale, Benjamin E. 2016. Partisan Disagreements Arising from Rationalization of Common Information. Political Science Research and Methods, Vol. 4, Issue. 03, p. 477.
Lawrence, Adria K. 2016. Repression and Activism among the Arab Spring’s First Movers: Evidence from Morocco’s February 20th Movement. British Journal of Political Science, p. 1.
An enduring concern about democracies is that citizens conform too readily to the policy views of elites in their own parties, even to the point of ignoring other information about the policies in question. This article presents two experiments that undermine this concern, at least under one important condition. People rarely possess even a modicum of information about policies; but when they do, their attitudes seem to be affected at least as much by that information as by cues from party elites. The experiments also measure the extent to which people think about policy. Contrary to many accounts, they suggest that party cues do not inhibit such thinking. This is not cause for unbridled optimism about citizens' ability to make good decisions, but it is reason to be more sanguine about their ability to use information about policy when they have it.
This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.
Full text views reflects the number of PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.
Abstract views reflect the number of visits to the article landing page.
* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.