Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-jtdwj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T14:37:51.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Formal Model of Learning and Policy Diffusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2008

CRAIG VOLDEN ,
MICHAEL M. TING  and
DANIEL P. CARPENTER
CRAIG VOLDEN*
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
MICHAEL M. TING*
Affiliation:
Columbia University
DANIEL P. CARPENTER*
Affiliation:
Harvard University
*
Craig Volden is Professor of Political Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210-1373; E-mail: volden.2@osu.edu.
Michael M. Ting is Associate Professor of Political Science and Public Affairs, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027; E-mail: mmt2033@columbia.edu.
Daniel P. Carpenter is Professor of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138. E-mail: dcarpenter@gov.harvard.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We present a model of learning and policy choice across governments. Governments choose policies with known ideological positions but initially unknown valence benefits, possibly learning about those benefits between the model's two periods. There are two variants of the model; in one, governments only learn from their own experiences, whereas in the other they learn from one another's experiments. Based on similarities between these two versions, we illustrate that much accepted scholarly evidence of policy diffusion could simply have arisen through independent actions by governments that only learn from their own experiences. However, differences between the game-theoretic and decision-theoretic models point the way to future empirical tests that discern learning-based policy diffusion from independent policy adoptions.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 102 , Issue 3 , August 2008 , pp. 319 - 332
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Aghion, Philippe, Bolton, Patrick, Harris, Christopher, and Jullien, Bruno. 1991. “Optimal Learning by Experimentation” Review of Economic Studies 58 (4): 621–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, and Rosenthal, Howard. 1995. Partisan Politics, Divided Government, and the Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balla, Steven J. 2001. “Interstate Professional Associations and the Diffusion of Policy Innovations” American Politics Research 29 (3): 221–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, Frances Stokes. 1994. “Sizing Up State Policy Innovation Research” Policy Studies Journal 22 (3): 442–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, Frances Stokes, and Berry, William D.. 1990. “State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis” American Political Science Review 84 (2): 395–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, William D., and Baybeck, Brady. 2005. “Using Geographic Information Systems to Study Interstate Competition” American Political Science Review 99 (4): 505–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besley, Timothy, and Case, Anne. 1995. “Incumbent Behavior: Vote-Seeking, Tax Setting and Yardstick Competition” American Economic Review 85 (1): 25–45.Google Scholar
Boehmke, Frederick J., and Witmer, Richard. 2004. “Disentangling Diffusion: The Effects of Social Learning and Economic Competition on State Policy Innovation and Expansion” Political Research Quarterly 57 (1): 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandeis, Louis Dembitz. 1932. Dissenting opinion. New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann, 285 U.S. 262, 311.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel P. 2004. “Protection Without Capture: Product Approval by a Politically Responsive, Learning Regulator” American Political Science Review 98 (4): 613–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Case Anne, C., Hines, James R. Jr., and Rosen, Harvey S.. 1993. “Budget Spillovers and Fiscal Policy Interdependence: Evidence from the States.” Journal of Public Economics 52 (3): 285–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Myong-Hun, and Harrington, Joseph E. Jr., 2005. “Discovery and Diffusion of Knowledge in an Endogenous Social Network” American Journal of Sociology 110 (4): 937–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conell, Carol, and Cohn, Samuel. 1995. “Learning from Other People's Actions: Environmental Variation and Diffusion in French Coal Mining Strikes, 1890–1935” American Journal of Sociology 101 (2): 366–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixit, Avinash K., and Pindyck, Robert S.. 1994. Investment Under Uncertainty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilardi, Fabrizio. 2005. “The Institutional Foundations of Regulatory Capitalism: The Diffusion of Independent Regulatory Agencies in Western Europe.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 598: 84–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Virginia. 1973. “Innovation in the States: A Diffusion Study.” American Political Science Review 67 (4): 1174–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossback, Lawrence J., Nicholson-Crotty, Sean, and Peterson, David A.. 2004. “Ideology and Learning in Policy Diffusion” American Politics Research 32 (5): 521–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holden, Robert T. 1986. “The Contagiousness of Aircraft Hijacking” American Journal of Sociology 91 (4): 874–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karch, Andrew. 2007. “Emerging Issues and Future Directions in State Policy Diffusion Research.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 7 (1): 54–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingdon, John W. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Klimenko, Mikhail M. 2004. “Industrial Targeting, Experimentation and Long-Run Specialization” Journal of Development Economics 73 (1): 75–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kollman, Ken, Miller, John H., and Page, Scott E.. 2000. “Decentralization and the Search for Policy Solutions” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 16 (1): 102–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manski, Charles F. 1993. “Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem” Review of Economic Studies 60 (3): 531–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meseguer, Covadonga. 2006. “Learning and Economic Policy Choices.” European Journal of Political Economy 22 (1): 156–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintrom, Michael. 1997. “Policy Entrepreneurs and the Diffusion of Innovation.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (3): 738–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Everett M. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed.New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Rosenkopf, Lori, and Abrahamson, Eric. 1999. “Modeling Reputational and Informational Influences in Threshold Models of Bandwagon Innovation Diffusion” Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 5 (4): 361–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipan, Charles R., and Volden, Craig. 2006. “Bottom-Up Federalism: The Diffusion of Antismoking Policies from U.S. Cities to States” American Journal of Political Science 50 (4): 825–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipan, Charles R., and Volden, Craig. 2008. “The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion” American Journal of Political Science 52 (4): 840–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Beth A., and Elkins, Zachary. 2004. “The Globalization of Liberalization: Policy Diffusion in the International Political Economy” American Political Science Review 98 (1): 171–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Diane. 1999. “Learning Lessons and Transferring Policy Across Time, Space, and Disciplines.” Politics 19 (1): 51–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strumpf, Koleman S. 2002. “Does Government Decentralization Increase Policy Innovation?” Journal of Public Economic Theory 4: 207–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volden, Craig. 2006. “States as Policy Laboratories: Emulating Success in the Children's Health Insurance Program.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (2): 294–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Jack L. 1969. “The Diffusion of Innovations Among the American States.” American Political Science Review 63 (3): 880–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.