Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 14
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Nistotskaya, Marina and Cingolani, Luciana 2016. Bureaucratic Structure, Regulatory Quality, and Entrepreneurship in a Comparative Perspective: Cross-Sectional and Panel Data Evidence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 26, Issue. 3, p. 519.

    Cull, Robert Xu, Lixin Colin Yang, Xi Zhou, Li-an and Zhu, Tian 2015. Market facilitation by local government and firm efficiency: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance,

    Earle, John S. and Gehlbach, Scott 2015. The Productivity Consequences of Political Turnover: Firm-Level Evidence from Ukraine's Orange Revolution. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 59, Issue. 3, p. 708.

    Hajar, Bakhtiar 2015. Bureaucracy and Governance in Indonesia: Study on West Sulawesi Province. Procedia Economics and Finance, Vol. 23, p. 223.

    Rochlitz, Michael Kulpina, Vera Remington, Thomas and Yakovlev, Andrei 2015. Performance incentives and economic growth: regional officials in Russia and China. Eurasian Geography and Economics, Vol. 56, Issue. 4, p. 421.

    Duvanova, Dinissa 2014. Economic Regulations, Red Tape, and Bureaucratic Corruption in Post-Communist Economies. World Development, Vol. 59, p. 298.

    Libman, A. and Obydenkova, A. 2014. Governance of Commons in a Large Nondemocratic Country: The Case of Forestry in the Russian Federation. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, Vol. 44, Issue. 2, p. 298.

    Martinez-Vazquez, Jorge and Timofeev, Andrey 2014. Intra-regional Equalization and Growth in Russia. Comparative Economic Studies, Vol. 56, Issue. 3, p. 469.

    Bhattacharya, Jay Gathmann, Christina and Miller, Grant 2013. The Gorbachev Anti-Alcohol Campaign and Russia's Mortality Crisis. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, Vol. 5, Issue. 2, p. 232.

    Frye, Timothy 2012. In From the Cold: Institutions and Causal Inference in Postcommunist Studies. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 15, Issue. 1, p. 245.

    Libman, Alexander 2012. Democracy, size of bureaucracy, and economic growth: evidence from Russian regions. Empirical Economics, Vol. 43, Issue. 3, p. 1321.

    Nelson, Harry W. and Nikolakis, William 2012. How Does Corporatization Improve the Performance of Government Agencies? Lessons From the Restructuring of State-Owned Forest Agencies in Australia. International Public Management Journal, Vol. 15, Issue. 3, p. 364.

    Earle, John S and Gehlbach, Scott 2011. Did Post-communist Privatization Increase Mortality?. Comparative Economic Studies, Vol. 53, Issue. 2, p. 239.

    Wendland, Kelly J. Lewis, David J. Alix-Garcia, Jennifer Ozdogan, Mutlu Baumann, Matthias and Radeloff, Volker C. 2011. Regional- and district-level drivers of timber harvesting in European Russia after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Global Environmental Change, Vol. 21, Issue. 4, p. 1290.


Helping Hand or Grabbing Hand? State Bureaucracy and Privatization Effectiveness

  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 May 2009

Why have economic reforms aimed at reducing the role of the state been successful in some cases but not others? Are reform failures the consequence of leviathan states that hinder private economic activity, or of weak states unable to implement policies effectively and provide a supportive institutional environment? We explore these questions in a study of privatization in postcommunist Russia. Taking advantage of large regional variation in the size of public administrations, and employing a multilevel research design that controls for preprivatization selection in the estimation of regional privatization effects, we examine the relationship between state bureaucracy and the impact of privatization on firm productivity. We find that privatization is more effective in regions with relatively large bureaucracies. Our analysis suggests that this effect is driven by the impact of bureaucracy on the postprivatization business environment, with better institutional support and less corruption when bureaucracies are large.

Corresponding author
J. David Brown is Reader in Finance, School of Management and Languages, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, United Kingdom (
John S. Earle is Senior Economist, Upjohn Institute for Employment Research and Professor, Department of Economics, Central European University, 300 South Westnedge Avenue, Kalamazoo, Michigan 49007 (
Scott Gehlbach is Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Wisconsin–Madison, and Research Associate, Centre for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR), 110 North Hall, 1050 Bascom Mall, Madison, WI 53706 (
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Daron Acemoglu , and Thierry Verdier . 2000. “The Choice Between Market Failures and Corruption.” American Economic Review 90 (1): 194211.

Christopher H. Achen 2005. “Two-Step Hierarchical Estimation: Beyond Regression Analysis.” Political Analysis 13 (4): 447–56.

J. David Brown , John S. Earle , and Álmos Telegdy . 2006. “The Productivity Effects of Privatization: Longitudinal Estimates from Hungary, Romania, Russia, and Ukraine.” Journal of Political Economy 114 (1): 6199.

Robert J. Brym , and Vladimir Gimpelson . 2004. “The Size, Composition, and Dynamics of the Russian State Bureaucracy in the 1990s.” Slavic Review 63 (1): 90112.

Simeon Djankov , and Peter Murrell . 2002. “Enterprise Restructuring in Transition: A Quantitative Survey.” Journal of Economic Literature 40 (3): 739–92.

Stephen G. Donald , and Kevin Lang . 2007. “Inference with Differences in Differences and Other Panel Data.” Review of Economics and Statistics 89 (2): 221–33.

Gerald Easter . 2002. “Politics of Revenue Extraction in Post-Communist States: Poland and Russia Compared.” Politics and Society 30 (4): 599627.

Peter Evans , and James E. Rauch . 1999. “Bureaucracy and Growth: A Cross-National Analysis of the Effects of ‘Weberian’ State Structures on Economic Growth.” American Sociological Review 64 (5): 748–65.

Timothy Frye , and Ekaterina Zhuravskaya . 2000. “Rackets, Regulation and the Rule of Law.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 16 (2): 478502.

Anna Grzymala-Busse , and Pauline Jones Luong . 2002. “Reconceptualizing the State: Lessons from Post-Communism.” Politics and Society 30 (4): 529–54.

Henry E. Hale 2003. “Explaining Machine Politics in Russia's Regions: Economy, Ethnicity, and Legacy.” Post-Soviet Affairs 19 (3): 228–63.

Eric A. Hanushek 1974. “Efficient Estimators for Regressing Regression Coefficients.” American Statistician 28 (2): 6667.

Karen Long Jusko , and W. Phillips Shively . 2005. “Applying a Two-Step Strategy to the Analysis of Cross-National Public Opinion Data.” Political Analysis 13: 327–44.

Stephen Knack , and Philip Keefer . 1995. “Institutions and Economic Performance: Cross-Country Tests Using Alternative Institutional Measures.” Economics and Politics 7 (3): 207–27.

Jeffrey B. Lewis , and Drew A. Linzer . 2005. “Estimating Regression Models in Which the Dependent Variable Is Based on Estimates.” Political Analysis 13 (4): 345–64.

Paolo Mauro . 1995. “Corruption and Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 110: 681712.

William L. Megginson , and Jeffrey M. Netter . 2001. “From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatization.” Journal of Economic Literature 39 (2): 321–89.

Jeffrey B. Miller , and Stoyan Tenev . 2007. “On the Role of Government in Transition: The Experiences of China and Russia Compared.” Comparative Economic Studies 49 (4): 543–71.

Andrei Shleifer , and Robert W. Vishny . 1993. “Corruption.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (3): 599617.

Daniel Treisman . 1999. “Russia's Tax Crisis: Explaining Falling Tax Revenues in a Transitional Economy.” Economics and Politics 11 (2): 145–69.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *