Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The Law of k/n: The Effect of Chamber Size on Government Spending in Bicameral Legislatures

  • JOWEI CHEN (a1) and NEIL MALHOTRA (a1)
Abstract

Recent work in political economics has examined the positive relationship between legislative size and spending, which Weingast et al. (1981) formalized as the law of 1/n. However, empirical tests of this theory have produced a pattern of divergent findings. The positive relationship between seats and spending appears to hold consistently for unicameral legislatures and for upper chambers in bicameral legislatures but not for lower chambers. We bridge this gap between theory and empirics by extending Weingast et al.'s model to account for bicameralism in the context of a Baron–Ferejohn bargaining game. Our comparative statics predict, and empirical data from U.S. state legislatures corroborate, that the size of the upper chamber (n) is a positive predictor of expenditure, whereas the ratio of lower-to-upper chamber seats (k) exhibits a negative effect. We refer to these relationships as the law of k/n, as the two variables influence spending in opposite directions.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Jowei Chen is a PhD Candidate, Department of Political Science, Stanford University, Encina Hall West, Room 100, Stanford, CA 94305-6044 (jowei@stanford.edu).
Neil Malhotra is a PhD Candidate, Department of Political Science, Stanford University, Encina Hall West, Room 100, Stanford, CA 94305-6044 (neilm@stanford.edu).
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

AnsolabehereStephen, James M.Snyder, and Michael M.Ting. 2003. “Bargaining in Bicameral Legislatures: When and Why Does Malapportionment Matter?American Political Science Review 97 (August): 471481.

BanksJeffrey S., and JohnDuggan. 2000. “A Bargaining Model of Collective Choice.” American Political Science Review 94 (March): 7388.

BaqirReza. 2002. “Districting and Government Overspending.” Journal of Political Economy 110 (December): 13181354.

BaronDavid P., and John A.Ferejohn. 1989. “Bargaining in Legislatures.” American Political Science Review 83 (December): 11811206.

BeckNathaniel, and Jonathan N.Katz. 1995. “What To Do (and Not To Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data.” American Political Science Review 89 (September): 634647.

BradburyJohn C., and William M.Crain. 2001. “Legislative Organization and Government Spending: Cross-Country Evidence.” Journal of Public Economics 82 (December): 309325.

BradburyJohn C., and E. FrankStephenson. 2003. “Local Government Structure and Public Expenditures.” Public Choice 115 (April): 185198.

BreuschTrevor S., and Adrian R.Pagan. 1979. “A Simple Test for Heteroskedasticity and Random Coefficient Variation.” Econometrica 47 (September): 12871294.

BuchananJames M., and GordonTullock. 1962. The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

GilliganThomas W., and John G.Matsusaka. 1995. “Deviations from Constituent Interests: The Role of Legislative Structure and Political Parties in the States.” Economic Inquiry 33 (July): 383401.

GilliganThomas W., and John G.Matsusaka. 2001. “Fiscal Policy, Legislature Size, and Political Parties: Evidence from the First Half of the Twentieth Century.” National Tax Journal 54 (March): 5782.

GilliganThomas W., and John G.Matsusaka. 2006. “Public Choice Principles of Redistricting.” Public Choice 129 (December): 381398.

MalhotraNeil. 2006. “Government Growth and Professionalism in U.S. State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 31 (November): 563584.

NiemiRichard G., Jeffrey S.Hill, and BernardGrofman. 1985. “The Impact of Multimember Districts on Party Representation in U.S. State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 10 (November): 441455.

OwingsStephanie, and RainaldBorck. 2000. “Legislative Professionalism and Government Spending: Do Citizen Legislators Really Spend Less?Public Finance Review 28 (May): 210225.

PrimoDavid M. 2006. “Stop Us Before We Spend Again: Institutional Constraints on Government Spending.” Economics & Politics. 18 (November): 269297.

SquirePeverill. 1988. “Career Opportunities and Membership Stability in Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 13 (February): 6582.

TsebelisGeorge. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

WeingastBarry R. 1994. “Reflections on Distributive Politics and Universalism.” Political Research Quarterly 47 (June): 319327.

WeingastBarry R., Kenneth A.Shepsle, and ChristopherJohnsen. 1981. “The Political Economy of Benefits and Costs: A Neoclassical Approach to Distributive Politics.” Journal of Political Economy 89 (August): 64264.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 25 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 201 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th August 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.