Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Optimal Obfuscation: Democracy and Trade Policy Transparency

  • DANIEL Y. KONO (a1)
Abstract

A growing body of research shows that democracies have more liberal trade policies than do autocracies. I argue, in contrast, that democracy has contradictory effects on different types of trade policies because electoral competition generates more information about some than about others. It generates considerable information about policies whose effects on consumer welfare are easy to explain to voters, but less information about policies whose effects are more complex. By increasing the transparency of some policies relative to others, democracy induces politicians to reduce transparent trade barriers but also to replace them with less transparent ones. I test this hypothesis by examining the impact of democracy on tariffs, “core” nontariff barriers (NTBs) such as quotas, and “quality” NTBs such as product standards in 75 countries in the 1990s. I find that democracy leads to lower tariffs, higher core NTBs, and even higher quality NTBs. I conclude that democracy promotes “optimal obfuscation” that allows politicians to protect their markets while maintaining a veneer of liberalization.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Daniel Y. Kono is Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, University of California at Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616-8682 (dykono@ucdavis.edu).
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

AdseraAlicia, and CarlesBoix. 2002. “Trade, Democracy, and the Size of the Public Sector.” International Organization 56 (Spring): 22962.

BabaStephen Anthony. 1997. “Democracies and Inefficiency.” Economics and Politics 9 (July): 99114.

BakerAndy. 2003. “Why Is Trade Reform so Popular in Latin America? A Consumption-Based Theory of Trade Policy Preferences.” World Politics 55 (April): 42355.

BlissHarry, and BruceRussett. 1998. “Democratic Trading Partners: The Liberal Connection, 1962–1989.” The Journal of Politics 60 (November): 112647.

CassingJames, Timothy J.McKeown, and JackOchs. 1986. “The Political Economy of the Tariff Cycle.” American Political Science Review 80 (September): 84362.

FrankelJeffrey A., and DavidRomer. 1999. “Does Trade Cause Growth?American Economic Review 89 (June): 37999.

FryeTimothy, and Edward D.Mansfield. 2004. “Timing Is Everything: Elections and Trade Liberalization in the Postcommunist World.” Comparative Political Studies 37 (May): 37198.

GawandeKishore, and Wendy L.Hansen. 1999. “Retaliation, Bargaining, and the Pursuit of ‘Free and Fair’ Trade.” International Organization 53 (Winter): 11759.

GilliganMichael J. 1997. Empowering Exporters: Reciprocity, Delegation, and Collective Action in American Trade Policy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

HerrmanRichard K., Philip E.Tetlock, and Matthew N.Diascro. 2001. “How Americans Think About Trade: Reconciling Conflicts Among Money, Power, and Principles.” International Studies Quarterly 45 (June): 191218.

KeeleLuke J., and Nathan J.Kelly. 2006. “Dynamic Models for Dynamic Theories: The Ins and Outs of Lagged Dependent Variables.” Political Analysis 14 (Spring): 186205.

KhattryBarsha, and J. MohanRao. 2002. “Fiscal Faux Pas?: An Analysis of the Revenue Implications of Trade Liberalization.” World Development 30 (August): 143144.

LeeJong-Wha, and PhillipSwagel. 1997. “Trade Barriers and Trade Flows Across Countries and Industries.” Review of Economics and Statistics 79 (August): 37282.

MansfieldEdward D., and Marc L.Busch. 1995. “The Political Economy of Nontariff Barriers: A Cross-National Analysis.” International Organization 49 (Autumn): 72349.

MansfieldEdward D., Helen V.Milner, and PeterRosendorff. 2000. “Free to Trade: Democracies, Autocracies, and International Trade.” American Political Science Review 94 (June): 30522.

MansfieldEdward D., Helen V.Milner, and PeterRosendorff. 2002. “Why Democracies Cooperate More: Electoral Control and International Trade Agreements.” International Organization 56 (Summer): 477514.

McGillivrayFiona. 1997. “Party Discipline as a Determinant of the Endogenous Formation of Tariffs.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (April): 584607.

MilnerHelen V., and BenjaminJudkins. 2004. “Partisanship, Trade Policy, and Globalization: Is There A Left-Right Divide on Trade Policy?International Studies Quarterly 48 (March): 95120.

MilnerHelen V., and KeikoKubota. 2005. “Why the Move to Free Trade? Democracy and Trade Policy in the Developing Countries.” International Organization 59 (Winter): 10744.

NielsonDaniel L. 2003. “Supplying Trade Reform: Political Institutions and Liberalization in Middle-Income Presidential Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (July): 47091.

RayEdward J. 1981. “The Determinants of Tariffs and Nontariff Trade Restrictions in the U.S.” Journal of Political Economy 89 (February): 10521.

RogowskiRonald. 1987. “Trade and the Variety of Democratic Institutions.” International Organization 41 (Spring): 20323.

RoseAndrew K. 2004. “Do WTO Members Have More Liberal Trade Policy?Journal of International Economics 63 (July): 20935.

SachsJeffrey D., and AndrewWarner. 1995. “Economic Reform and the Process of Global Integration.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1995 (1): 1118.

TreflerDaniel. 1993. “Trade Liberalization and the Theory of Endogenous Protection: An Econometric Study of U.S. Import Policy.” The Journal of Political Economy 101 (February): 13860.

WittmanDonald. 1989. “Why Democracies Produce Efficient Results.” Journal of Political Economy 97 (December): 1395424.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 25
Total number of PDF views: 284 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 697 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.