Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T07:33:28.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Rationality of Hegel's Concept of Monarchy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Bernard Yack
Bernard Yack*
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this essay I argue that Hegel's concept of monarchy, far from being more evidence of his supposed abstract rationalism or deference to Prussia, is the most complete modern account of the necessary political conditions of a rational state. Hegel believed that the peculiar historical development of European monarchy made the rational state politically possible. Who rules is the fundamental political problem. Some person or persons must have the final power of decision, even in constitutional and parliamentary regimes, and thus stamp the regime with their own particular views. Hegel believed that only the constitutional monarch of a modern state, bom to sovereignty regardless of his personal abilities or constituencies, limited by harsh experience and public sentiments to legitimization of public acts, could depoliticize this final power of decision. This alone would allow unimpeded public administration according to rational legal standards. Marxist and technocratic dreams of rational administration will remain mere dreams as long as the dreamers offer no alternative solution to the fundamental political problem.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 74 , Issue 3 , September 1980 , pp. 709 - 720
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Avineri, Schlomo (1972). Hegel's Theory of the Modern State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constant, Benjamin (1918). Principes de Politiques. In Oeuvres. Paris: Pleiade.Google Scholar
Fackenheim, Emil (1970). “On the Actuality of the Rational and the Rationality of the Actual.” Review of Metaphysics 13: 690–98.Google Scholar
Forbes, Ducan (1975). Introduction to G. W. F., Hegel, Reason in History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbon, Edward (n.d.). The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, 2 vols. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1975). Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art. Translated by Knox, T. M.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1911). Grundlinien der Philosophic des Rechts. Edited by Lasson, Georg. Leipzig: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1955). Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts. Edited by Hoffmeister, Johannes. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1952). Philosophy of Right. Translated by Knox, T. M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1964). Political Writings. Translated by Knox, T. M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1913). Schriften zur Politik und Rechtsphilosophie. Edited by Lasson, G.. Leipzig: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1974). Vorlesungen über Rechtsphilosophie, Bd. IV. Edited by Ilting, Karl-Heinz. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holtzboog.Google Scholar
Hočevar, R. K. (1973). Hegel und der Preussische Staat. München: Goldmann.Google Scholar
Knox, T. M. (1952). Introduction and notes to Hegel's Philosophy of Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl (1971). Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right. Translated and edited by O'Malley, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pelczynski, Z. A., ed. (1971). Hegel's Political Philosophy: Problems and Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Riedel, Manfred (1971). “Nature and Freedom in Hegel's Philosophy of Right.” In Pelczynski, Z. A. (ed.), Hegel's Political Philosophy: Problems and Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ritter, Joachim (1969). “Hegel und die Franzöische Revolution.” In Metaphysik und Politik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, Franz (1920). Hegel und der Staat, 2 Bde. Neudruck, Aalen: Scientia Verlag.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles (1975). Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de (1945). Democracy in America, 2 vols. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1958). “Politics as a Vocation.” In Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. Wright (eds.), From Max Weber. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1968). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Edited by Parsons, Talcott. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Weil, Eric (1950). Hegel et l'Etat. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar