Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 126
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Abramowitz, Alan I. and Webster, Steven 2016. The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century. Electoral Studies, Vol. 41, p. 12.

    Barisione, Mauro 2016. The Partisan Gap in Leader Support and Attitude Polarization in a Campaign Environment: The Cases of Germany and Italy. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, p. edw017.

    Davis, Nicholas T. and Dunaway, Johanna L. 2016. Party Polarization, Media Choice, and Mass Partisan-Ideological Sorting. Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 80, Issue. S1, p. 272.

    Deckman, Melissa Cox, Dan Jones, Robert and Cooper, Betsy 2016. Faith and the Free Market: Evangelicals, the Tea Party, and Economic Attitudes. Politics and Religion, p. 1.

    Gervais, Bryan T. 2016. More than Mimicry? The Role of Anger in Uncivil Reactions to Elite Political Incivility. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, p. edw010.

    Hansen, Susan B. 2016. Women’s Equality, Candidate Difference, and the Vote. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, Vol. 37, Issue. 1, p. 47.

    Hansen, Susan B. and Ha, Shang 2016. Sex, race, gender, and the presidential vote. Cogent Social Sciences, Vol. 2, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Harrison, Brian F. 2016. Bully Partisan or Partisan Bully?: Partisanship, Elite Polarization, and U.S. Presidential Communication*. Social Science Quarterly, Vol. 97, Issue. 2, p. 418.

    Hetherington, Marc J. Long, Meri T. and Rudolph, Thomas J. 2016. Revisiting the Myth. Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 80, Issue. S1, p. 321.

    Holmes, Justin W. and McNeal, Ramona Sue 2016. (R)evolutionizing Political Communication through Social Media.

    Kleiner, Tuuli-Marja 2016. Führt Polarisierung zu politischem Engagement?. Swiss Political Science Review,

    Lelkes, Yphtach 2016. Mass Polarization: Manifestations and Measurements. Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 80, Issue. S1, p. 392.

    Neiman, Jayme L. Gonzalez, Frank J. Wilkinson, Kevin Smith, Kevin B. and Hibbing, John R. 2016. Speaking Different Languages or Reading from the Same Script? Word Usage of Democratic and Republican Politicians. Political Communication, Vol. 33, Issue. 2, p. 212.

    Neundorf, Anja and Adams, James 2016. The Micro-Foundations of Party Competition and Issue Ownership: The Reciprocal Effects of Citizens’ Issue Salience and Party Attachments. British Journal of Political Science, p. 1.

    Nicholson, Stephen P. Coe, Chelsea M. Emory, Jason and Song, Anna V. 2016. The Politics of Beauty: The Effects of Partisan Bias on Physical Attractiveness. Political Behavior,

    Robison, Joshua and Mullinix, Kevin J. 2016. Elite Polarization and Public Opinion: How Polarization Is Communicated and Its Effects. Political Communication, Vol. 33, Issue. 2, p. 261.

    Rogowski, Jon C. 2016. Voter Decision-Making with Polarized Choices. British Journal of Political Science, p. 1.

    Rogowski, Jon C. and Sutherland, Joseph L. 2016. How Ideology Fuels Affective Polarization. Political Behavior, Vol. 38, Issue. 2, p. 485.

    Aaroe, L. and Jensen, C. 2015. Learning to Match: How Prior Frame Exposure Increases Citizens' Value Matching Abilities. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, Vol. 27, Issue. 1, p. 46.

    Avery, James M. 2015. Does Who Votes Matter? Income Bias in Voter Turnout and Economic Inequality in the American States from 1980 to 2010. Political Behavior, Vol. 37, Issue. 4, p. 955.


Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization

  • Marc J. Hetherington (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 January 2002

For the most part, scholars who study American political parties in the electorate continue to characterize them as weak and in decline. Parties on the elite level, however, have experienced a resurgence over the last two decades. Such a divergence between elite behavior and mass opinion is curious, given that most models of public opinion place the behavior of elites at their core. In fact, I find that parties in the electorate have experienced a noteworthy resurgence over the last two decades. Greater partisan polarization in Congress has clarified the parties’ ideological positions for ordinary Americans, which in turn has increased party importance and salience on the mass level. Although parties in the 1990s are not as central to Americans as they were in the 1950s, they are far more important today than in the 1970s and 1980s. The party decline thesis is in need of revision.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *