Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization

  • Marc J. Hetherington (a1)
Abstract

For the most part, scholars who study American political parties in the electorate continue to characterize them as weak and in decline. Parties on the elite level, however, have experienced a resurgence over the last two decades. Such a divergence between elite behavior and mass opinion is curious, given that most models of public opinion place the behavior of elites at their core. In fact, I find that parties in the electorate have experienced a noteworthy resurgence over the last two decades. Greater partisan polarization in Congress has clarified the parties’ ideological positions for ordinary Americans, which in turn has increased party importance and salience on the mass level. Although parties in the 1990s are not as central to Americans as they were in the 1950s, they are far more important today than in the 1970s and 1980s. The party decline thesis is in need of revision.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Party Politics in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Aldrich, John H., Berger, Mark M., and Rohde, David W.. 1999. “The Historical Variability in Conditional Party Government, 1877– 1986.” Paper presented at Conference on the History of Congress, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, January 1415.
Bartels, Larry M. 2000. “Partisanship and Voting Behavior. 1952–1996.American Journal of Political Science 44 (January): 3550.
Paul Allen, Beck. 1997. Party Politics in America. 8th ed. New York: Longman.
Brady, Henry E., Herron, Michael, Mebane, Walter, Jr., Skehon, Jasjeet, Shotts, Kenneth W., and Wand, Jonathan. 2001. “Law and Data: The Butterfly Ballot Episode.PS: Political Science & Politics 34 (March): 5970.
Brody, Richard A. 1991. Assessing the President: The Media, Elite Opinion, and Public Support. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Burden, Barry C., and Kimball, David C.. 1999. “A New Approach to the Study of Ticket Splitting.American Political Science Review 92 (September): 53344.
Burns, Nancy, Kinder, Donald R., Rosenstone, Steven J., Sapiro, Virginia, and the National Election Studies. 2001. National Election Studies, 2000: Pre-/Post-Election Study [data set]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies [producer and distributor].
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
Carmines, Edward G., and Stimson, James A.. 1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Craig, Stephen C. 1985. “The Decline of Partisanship in the United States: A Reexamination of the Neutrality Hypothesis.Political Behavior 7 (March): 5778.
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
DeSart, Jay A.Information Processing and Partisan Neutrality: A Reexamination of the Party Decline Thesis.Journal of Politics 57 (August): 77695.
Dionne, E. J., Jr. 1991. Why Americans Hate Politics. New York: Touchstone.
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
Erikson, Robert S., MacKuen, Michael B., and Stimson, James A.. 1998. “What Moves Macropartisanship: A Response to Green, Palmquist, and Schickler.American Political Science Review 92 (December): 90112.
Fiorina, Morris P. 1992. “An Era of Divided Government.Political Science Quarterly 107 (Autumn): 387410.
Fiorina, Morris P. 1996. Divided Government. 2d ed. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Graber, Doris A. Mass Media and American Politics. 5th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Green, Donald P., Palmquist, Bradley, and Schickler, Eric. 1998. “Macropartisanship: A Replication and Critique.American Political Science Review 92 (December): 883900.
Green, Donald P., Palmquist, Bradley, and Schickler, Eric. 2000. “The Coming Democratic Realignment.PS: Political Science & Politics 33 (June): 199200.
Hetherington, Marc J. 1999. “The Effect of Political Trust on the Presidential Vote: 1968–96.American Political Science Review 93 (June): 31126.
Hibbing, John R., and Elizabeth Theiss-Morse. 1995. Congress as Public Enemy: Public Attitudes Toward American Political Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hinich, Melvin J., and Munger, Michael C.. 1994. Ideology and the Theory of Political Choice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Keefe, William J. 1998. Parties, Politics, and Public Policy in America. 8th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Keith Bruce, E., Magleby, David B., Nelson, Candice J., Orr, Elizabeth, Westlye, Mark C., and Wolfinger, Raymond E.. 1992. The Myth of the Independent Voter. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Key, V. O. 1966. The Responsible Electorate. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
King, David C. 1997. “The Polarization of American Parties and Mistrust of Government.” In Why People Don't Trust Government. ed. Nye, Joseph S., Jr., Zelikow, Philip D., and King, David C.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Pp. 15578.
Konda, Thomas M., and Sigelman, Lee. 1987. “Public Evaluations of the American Parties, 1952–1984.Journal of Politics 49 (August): 81429.
Luskin, Robert C. 1987. “Measuring Political Sophistication.American Journal of Political Science 31 (November): 85699.
Luskin, Robert C. N.d. “From Denial to Extenuation (and Finally Beyond): Political Sophistication and Citizen Performance.” In Thinking about Political Psychology. ed. Kuklinski, James H.. New York: Cambridge University Press. Forthcoming.
MacKuen, Michael B., Erikson, Robert S., and Stimson, James A.. 1989. “Macropartisanship.American Political Science Review 83 (December): 112542.
Markus, Gregory B. 1988. “The Impact of Personal and National Economic Conditions on the Presidential Vote: A Pooled Cross-Sectional Analysis.American Journal of Political Science 32 (January): 13754.
Mermin, Jonathan. 1999. Debating War and Peace: Media Coverage of U.S. Intervention in the Post-Vietnam Era. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Miller, Warren E. 1998. “Party Identification and the Electorate of the 1990s.” In The Parties Respond: Changes in American Parties and Campaigns. 3d ed., ed. L. Sandy Maisel. Boulder, CO: Westview. Pp. 10927.
Mondak, Jeffrey J. 1999. “Reconsidering the Measurement of Political Knowledge.Political Analysis 8 (1): 5782.
Nie, Norman H., Verba, Sidney, and Petrocik, John R.. 1979. The Changing American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Page, Benjamin I. 1978. Choices and Echoes in Presidential Elections: Rational Man and Electoral Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Page, Benjamin I., and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pomper, Gerald M. 2001. “The Presidential Election.” In The Election of 2000. ed. Pomper, Gerald M.. New York: Chatham House. Pp. 12554.
Poole, Keith T. 1998. “Recovering a Basic Space from a Set of Issue Scales.American Journal of Political Science 42 (July): 95493.
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
Popkin, Samuel L. 1994. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. 2d ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Price, Vincent, and Zaller, John. 1993. “Who Gets the News? Alternative Measures of News Reception and Their Implications for Research.Public Opinion Quarterly 57 (Summer): 13364.
Rhode, David W. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rosenstone, Steven J., Behr, Roy L., and Lazarus, Edward H.. 1996. Third Parties in America: Citizen Response to Major Party Failure. 2d ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Saad, Lydia. 2000. “Gore's Image Slipping as Election Contest Drags On.” Gallup Poll News Release. December 6.
Sapiro, Virginia, Rosenstone, Steven J., Miller, Warren E., and the National Election Studies. 1997. 1948–1996 Cumulative Data File [data set]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies [producer and distributor].
Schattschneider, E. E. 1975. The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. 2d ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Sniderman, Paul M., Brody, Richard A., and Tetlock, Philip E.. 1991. Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stanga, John E., and Sheffield, James F.. 1987. “The Myth of Zero Partisanship: Attitudes Toward the American Political Parties.American Journal of Political Science 31 (November): 82155.
Wattenberg, Martin P. 1984. The Decline of American Political Parties, 1952–1980. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wattenberg, Martin P. 1990. The Decline of American Political Parties, 1952–1988. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wattenberg, Martin P. 1994. The Decline of American Political Parties, 1952–1992. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wattenberg, Martin P. 1996. The Decline of American Political Parties, 1952–1994. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wattenberg, Martin P. 1998. The Decline of American Political Parties, 1952–1996. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed