Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Rule Creation in a Political Hierarchy

  • CLIFFORD J. CARRUBBA (a1) and TOM S. CLARK (a1)
Abstract

Principal-agent relations are replete in politics; politicians are agents of electorates, bureaucrats are agents of executives, lower courts are agents of upper courts, and much more. Commonly, principals are modeled as the rule-making body and agents as the rule-implementing body. However, principals often delegate the authority to make the rules themselves to their agents. The relationship between the lower federal courts and the Supreme Court is one such example; a considerable portion of the law (rules) is made in the lower federal courts with the Supreme Court serving primarily as the overseer of those lower courts’ decisions. In this article, we develop and test a principal-agent model of law (rule) creation in a judicial hierarchy. The model yields new insights about the relationship among various features of the judicial hierarchy that run against many existing perceptions. For example, we find a non-monotonic relationship between the divergence in upper and lower court preferences over rules and the likelihood of review and reversal by the Supreme Court. The empirical evidence supports these derived relationships. Wider implications for the principal-agent literature are also discussed.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Clifford J. Carrubba is Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Emory University, 327 Tarbutton Hall, 1555 Dickey Drive, Atlanta, GA 30322 (ccarrub@emory.edu).
Tom S. Clark is Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Emory University, 327 Tarbutton Hall, 1555 Dickey Drive, Atlanta, GA 30322 (tom.clark@emory.edu).
References
Hide All
Beim, Deborah, and Kastellec, Jonathan P.. 2011. “Strategic Dissents in the Judicial Hierarchy: Theory and Evidence from Death Penalty Cases.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Seattle.
Caldeira, Greg A., Wright, John R., and Zorn, Christopher J. W.. 1999. “Sophisticated Voting and Gate-keeping in the Supreme Court.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 15: 549–72.
Cameron, Charles M., Segal, Jeffrey A., and Songer, Donald R.. 2000. “Strategic Auditing in a Political Hierarchy: An Informational Model of the Supreme Court's Certiorari Decisions.” American Political Science Review 94: 101–16.
Clark, Tom S. 2009. “A Principal-Agent Model of en Banc Review.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 25 (1): 5579.
Clark, Tom S., and Carrubba, Clifford J.. 2012. “A Theory of Opinion Writing in the Judicial Hierarchy.” Journal of Politics 74 (2): 584603.
Clark, Tom S., and Lauderdale, Benjamin. 2010. “Locating Supreme Court Opinions in Doctrine Space.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (4): 871–90.
Clark, Tom S., and Strauss, Aaron B.. 2010. “The Implications of High Court Docket Control for Resource Allocation and Legal Efficiency.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 22 (2): 247–68.
Cross, Frank B. 2005. “Appellate Court Adherence to Precedent.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 2: 369405.
Epstein, Lee, Martin, Andrew D., Segal, Jeffrey A., and Westerland, Chad. 2007. “The Judicial Common Space.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 23 (2): 303–25.
Friedman, Barry. 2006. “Taking Law Seriously.” Perspectives on Politics 4 (2): 261–76.
Giles, Michael W., Hettinger, Virginia A., and Peppers, Todd. 2002. Measuring the Preferences of Federal Judges: Alternatives to Party of the Appointing President. Emory University. Working paper.
Greene, William H. 2003. Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Haire, Susan B., Songer, Donald R., and Lindquist, Stefanie A.. 2003. “Appellate Court Supervision in the Federal Judiciary: A Hierarchical Perspective.” Law and Society Review 37 (1): 143–68.
Hammond, Thomas H., Bonneau, Chris W., and Sheehan, Reginald S.. 2006. Institutional Games and the U.S. Supreme Court. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
Hettinger, Virginia A., Lindquist, Stephanie A., and Martinek, Wendy L.. 2004. “Comparing Attitudinal and Strategic Accounts of Dissenting Behavior on the U.S. Courts of Appeals.” American Journal of Political Science 48: 123–37.
Hettinger, Virginia A., Lindquist, Virginia A., and Martinek, Wendy L.. 2006. Judging on a Collegial Court: Influences on Federal Appellate Decision Making. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
Jacobi, Tonja, and Tiller, Emerson H.. 2007. “Legal Doctrine and Political Control.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 23 (2): 326–45.
Kastellec, Jonathan P. 2007. “Panel Composition and Judicial Compliance on the United States Courts of Appeals.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 23 (2): 421–41.
Klein, David E. 2002. Making Law in the United States Courts of Appeal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Klein, David E., and Hume, Robert J.. 2003. “Fear of Reversal as an Explanation of Lower Court Compliance.” Law and Society Review 37 (3): 579606.
Kornhauser, Lewis A. 1992. “Modeling Collegial Courts II: Legal Doctrine.” Journal of Law Economics and Organization 8: 441–70.
Lax, Jeffrey R. 2007. “Constructing Legal Rules on Appellate Courts.” American Political Science Review 101 (3): 591604.
Lax, Jeffrey R. 2009. Political Constraints on Legal Doctrine: How Hierarchy Shapes the Law. Columbia University Working paper.
Lax, Jeffrey R. 2011. “The New Judicial Politics of Legal Doctrine.” Annual Review of Political Science 14: 131–57.
Lindquist, Stefanie A., Haire, Susan B., and Songer, Donald R.. 2007. “Supreme Court Auditing of the U.S. Courts of Appeals: An Organizational Perspective.” Journal of Public Administration Research Theory 17 (4): 607–24.
Martin, Andrew D., and Quinn, Kevin M.. 2002. “Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999.” Political Analysis 10 (2): 134–53.
McGuire, Kevin T., Vanberg, Georg, Smith, Charles E. Jr., and Caldeira, Gregory A.. 2009. “Measuring Policy Content on the U.S. Supreme Court.” Journal of Politics 71 (4): 1305–21.
McNollgast. 1995. “Politics and the Courts: A Positive Theory of Judicial Doctrine and the Rule of Law.” Southern California Law Review 68: 1631–89.
Perry, H.W. Jr., 1991. Deciding to Decide: Agenda Setting in the United States Supreme Court. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Posner, Richard A. 1995. Overcoming Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Staton, Jeffrey K., and Vanberg, Georg. 2008. “The Value of Vagueness: Delegation, Defiance, and Judicial Opinions.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (3): 504–19.
Tiller, Emerson H., and Spiller, Pablo T.. 1999. “Strategic Instruments: Legal Structue and Political Games in Administrative Law.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 15 (2): 349–77.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed