Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 37
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Chilton, Adam S. and Versteeg, Mila 2016. Do Constitutional Rights Make a Difference?. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 60, Issue. 3, p. 575.

    Fuhrmann, Matthew and Lupu, Yonatan 2016. Do Arms Control Treaties Work? Assessing the Effectiveness of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. International Studies Quarterly, p. sqw013.

    McCorquodale, Robert 2016. DEFINING THE INTERNATIONAL RULE OF LAW: DEFYING GRAVITY?. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 65, Issue. 02, p. 277.

    Nelson, Stephen C. and Wallace, Geoffrey P. R. 2016. Are IMF lending programs good or bad for democracy?. The Review of International Organizations,

    Wang, Zhiyuan 2016. Treaty Commitment as a Signaling Device: Explaining the Ratification of the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights. Human Rights Review, Vol. 17, Issue. 2, p. 193.

    Donno, Daniela Metzger, Shawna K. and Russett, Bruce 2015. Screening Out Risk: IGOs, Member State Selection, and Interstate Conflict, 1951-2000. International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 59, Issue. 2, p. 251.

    Hoffman, Steven J. and Røttingen, John-Arne 2015. Assessing the Expected Impact of Global Health Treaties: Evidence From 90 Quantitative Evaluations. American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 105, Issue. 1, p. 26.

    Lupu, Yonatan 2015. Legislative Veto Players and the Effects of International Human Rights Agreements. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 59, Issue. 3, p. 578.

    Mazumder, Soumyajit 2015. Can I stay a BIT longer? The effect of bilateral investment treaties on political survival. The Review of International Organizations,

    Nielsen, Richard A. and Simmons, Beth A. 2015. Rewards for Ratification: Payoffs for Participating in the International Human Rights Regime?. International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 59, Issue. 2, p. 197.

    Welch, Ryan M. 2015. National Human Rights Institutions: Domestic implementation of international human rights law. Journal of Human Rights, p. 1.

    Carey, Henry F. 2014. Examining Torture.

    COLE, WADE M. 2013. Government Respect for Gendered Rights: The Effect of the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women on Women’s Rights Outcomes, 1981-20041. International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 57, Issue. 2, p. 233.

    Huth, Paul K. Croco, Sarah E. and Appel, Benjamin J. 2013. Bringing Law to the Table: Legal Claims, Focal Points, and the Settlement of Territorial Disputes Since 1945. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 57, Issue. 1, p. 90.

    Lupu, Yonatan 2013. The Informative Power of Treaty Commitment: Using the Spatial Model to Address Selection Effects. American Journal of Political Science, p. n/a.

    Spilker, Gabriele and Böhmelt, Tobias 2013. The impact of preferential trade agreements on governmental repression revisited. The Review of International Organizations, Vol. 8, Issue. 3, p. 343.

    Vollenweider, Jürg 2013. The effectiveness of international environmental agreements. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Vol. 13, Issue. 3, p. 343.

    Dinesen, Peter Thisted 2012. Does Generalized (Dis)Trust Travel? Examining the Impact of Cultural Heritage and Destination-Country Environment on Trust of Immigrants. Political Psychology, Vol. 33, Issue. 4, p. 495.

    Goodliffe, Jay Hawkins, Darren Horne, Christine and Nielson, Daniel L. 2012. Dependence Networks and the International Criminal Court1. International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 56, Issue. 1, p. 131.

    Hollyer, James R. and Rosendorff, B. Peter 2012. Leadership Survival, Regime Type, Policy Uncertainty and PTA Accession1. International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 56, Issue. 4, p. 748.


The Constraining Power of International Treaties: Theory and Methods

  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 November 2005

We acknowledge the contribution of von Stein (2005) in calling attention to the very real problem of selection bias in estimating treaty effects. Nonetheless, we dispute both von Stein's theoretical and empirical conclusions. Theoretically, we contend that treaties can both screen and constrain simultaneously, meaning that findings of screening do nothing to undermine the claim that treaties constrain state behavior as well. Empirically, we question von Stein's estimator on several grounds, including its strong distributional assumptions and its statistical inconsistency. We then illustrate that selection bias does not account for much of the difference between Simmons's (2000) and von Stein's (2005) estimated treaty effects, and instead reframe the problem as one of model dependency. Using a preprocessing matching step to reduce that dependency, we then illustrate treaty effects that are both substantively and statistically significant—and that are quite close in magnitude to those reported by Simmons.

Corresponding author
Beth A. Simmons is Professor, Department of Government, Harvard University, 1033 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139 (
Daniel J. Hopkins is a Ph.D. student, Department of Government, Harvard University, Littauer Center, North Yard, Cambridge, MA 02138 (
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *