Skip to main content
×
×
Home

The Rhetoric of Sincerity: Cicero and Smith on Propriety and Political Context

  • DANIEL J. KAPUST (a1) and MICHELLE A. SCHWARZE (a1)
Abstract

The study of rhetoric has recently undergone a revival in political theory as a response to deliberative democratic approaches that value reason over affect in the political sphere. Most rhetorical revivalists look to Aristotle and develop accounts of ethos (character) that privilege the epistemic dimensions of trust, while overlooking the importance that considerations of propriety play in shaping the political speech of democratic leaders. We reconsider the rhetorical approach by integrating the regulative standards suggested by two political thinkers who also were theorists of rhetoric: Cicero and Adam Smith. Committed to character's role in collective judgment, Cicero and Smith both hold that sincerity and context shape decorum or propriety: Leaders rely on decorum to shape their rhetorical appeals, and audiences look to the fit between speech and character to gauge moral trustworthiness. Smith, however, goes beyond Cicero to develop a rhetorical theory more relevant for democracies by highlighting the importance of political context for rhetorical appeals and evaluations. We conclude by suggesting that attention to these components of decorum moves beyond Aristotelian accounts of rhetorical character in a way that is consistent with much empirical research on how voters judge the character of elected officials.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Daniel J. Kapust is Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison (djkapust@wisc.edu).
Michelle A. Schwarze is Post-Doctoral Fellow, Department of Political Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison
References
Hide All
Abizadeh, Arash. 2002. “The Passions of the Wise: Phronêsis, Rhetoric, and Aristotle's Passionate Practical Deliberation.” Review of Metaphysics 56: 267–96.
Abizadeh, Arash. 2007. “On the Philosophy/Rhetoric Binaries: Or, Is Habermasian Discourse Motivationally Impotent?Philosophy and Social Criticism 33, no. 4: 445–72.
Allen, Danielle. Talking to Strangers: Anxieties of Citizenship since Brown v. Board of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006.
Arena, Valentina. 2013. “The Orator and His Audience: The Rhetorical Perspective in the Art of Deliberation.” 195210. In Steel, C. and Van Der Blom, H., eds. Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Arena, Valentina. 2013. “The Orator and His Audience: The Rhetorical Perspective in the Art of Deliberation.” In Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome, eds. Steel, Catherine and van der Blom, Henriette. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 195209.
Aristotle. On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. Trans. Kennedy, George A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Brunt, P.A. 2013. Studies in Stoicism. Edited by Miriam, Griffin, Alison, Samuels, and Michael, Crawford. Oxford. Oxford University Press.
Chambers, Simone. 2009. “Rhetoric and the Public Sphere: Has Deliberative Democracy Abandoned Mass Democracy?Political Theory 37, no. 3: 323–50.
Cicero. 1952. Orator. Trans. Hubbell, H. M.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1952.
Cicero. 1991. On Duties. Eds. Griffin, M. T. and Atkins, E. M. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cicero. 2001. On the Ideal Orator. Trans. May, James M. and Wisse, Jakob. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Den Uyl, Douglass J. 2011. “Das Shaftesbury Problem.” The Adam Smith Review. 6. 209223.
Fantham, Elaine. 1984. “ Orator 69–74.” Central States Speech Journal 35, no. 2: 123–25.
Fantham, Elaine. 2004. The Roman World of Cicero's De Oratore. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fjelstad, Per. 2003. “Restraint and Emotion in Cicero's De Oratore .” Philosophy and Rhetoric 36, no. 1: 3947.
Fontana, Benedetto, Nederman, Cary J., and Remer, Gary. 2004. “Introduction: Deliberative Democracy and the Rhetorical Turn.” In Talking Democracy: Historical Perspectives on Rhetoric and Democracy, eds. Fontana, Benedetto, Nederman, Cary J., and Remer, Gary. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press 125.
Frazer, Michael. 2010. The Enlightenment of Sympathy: Justice and the Moral Sentiments in the Eighteenth Century and Today. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fridkin, Kim L., and Kenney, Patrick J.. 2011. “The Role of Candidate Traits in Campaigns.” Journal of Politics 73: 6173.
Funk, Carolyn L. 1997. “Implications of Political Expertise in Candidate Trait Evaluations.” Political Research Quarterly 50: 675–97.
Funk, Carolyn L. 1999. “Bringing the Candidate into Models of Candidate Evaluations.” Journal of Politics 61: 700–20.
Garsten, Bryan. 2006. Saving Persuasion: A Defense of Rhetoric and Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006.
Garsten, Bryan. 2011. “The Rhetoric Revival in Political Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 14: 159–80.
Gill, Christopher. 1988. “Personhood and Personality: The Four-Personae Theory in Cicero, De Officiis I.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy VI: 169–99.
Griswold, Charles L. 1999. Adam Smith and the Virtues of Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hanley, Ryan Patrick. 2014. “The ‘Wisdom of the State’: Adam Smith on China and Tartary.” American Political Science Review 108, no. 2: 371–82.
Hayes, Danny. 2005. “Candidate Qualities through a Partisan Lens: A Theory of Trait Ownership.” American Journal of Political Science 49: 908–23.
Hayes, Danny. 2010. “Trait Voting in U.S. Senate Elections.” American Politics Research 38: 1102–29.
Herzog, Lisa. 2013. “The Community of Commerce: Smith's Rhetoric of Sympathy in the Opening of the Wealth of Nations .” Philosophy and Rhetoric 46, no. 1: 6587.
Home Style: House Members in their Districts . By Richard F. Fenno, Jr. (Boston and Toronto: Little, Brown and Co.), 1978.
Kapust, Daniel J. 2011. “Cicero on Decorum and the Morality of Rhetoric.” European Journal of Political Theory 10, no. 1: 92112.
Kelly, Duncan. 2011. The Propriety of Liberty: Person, Passions, and Judgment in Modern Political Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Lupia and Mathew D. McCubbins, The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need To Know? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998
Manin, Bernard. 1987. “On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation.” Political Theory 15: 338–68.
Markovits, Elizabeth. 2008. The Politics of Sincerity: Plato, Frank Speech, and Democratic Judgment. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
McCurley, Carl, and J. Mondak, Jeffery. 1995Inspected by 1184063113: The Influence of Incumbents’ Competence and Integrity in U.S. House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science. 39(November): 864–85.
McKenna, Stephen J. 2006. Adam Smith: The Rhetoric of Propriety. Albany: State University of New York Press.
O’Neill, John. 2002. “The Rhetoric of Deliberation: Some Problems in Kantian Theories of Deliberative Democracy.” Res Publica 8: 249–68.
Phillips, Mark Salber. 2006. “Adam Smith, Belletrist.” In The Cambridge Companion to Adam Smith, ed. Haakonsen, Knud. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 5778.
Powell, J. G. F. 1995. “Cicero's Philosophical Works and Their Background.” In Cicero the Philosopher: Twelve Papers, ed. Powell, J. G. F.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 135.
Remer, Gary. 1999. “Political Oratory and Conversation: Cicero versus Deliberative Democracy.” Political Theory 27, no. 1: 3664.
Remer, Gary. 2004. “Cicero and the Ethics of Deliberative Rhetoric.” In Talking Democracy: Historical Perspectives on Rhetoric and Democracy, eds. Fontana, Benedetto, Nederman, Cary J., and Remer, Gary. University Park: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Remer, Gary. 2013. “Rhetoric, Emotional Manipulation, and Political Morality: The Modern Relevance of Cicero vis-à-vis Aristotle.” Rhetorica 31, no. 4: 402–43.
Riggsby, Andrew M. 1995. “Pliny on Cicero and Oratory: Self-Fashioning in the Public Eye.” American Journal of Philology 116, no. 1: 123–35.
Riggsby, Andrew M. 2004. “The Rhetoric of Character in the Roman Courts.” In Cicero the Advocate, eds. Powell, J. G. F. and Patterson, Jeremy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 165–85.
Smith, Adam, 1982. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
Smith, Adam. 1983. Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres. Edited by Bryce, J.C.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vivenza, Gloria. 2001. Adam Smith and the Classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Waszek, N. 1984. “Two Concepts of Morality: A Distinction of Adam Smith's Ethics and Its Stoic Origin.” Journal of the History of Ideas 45, no. 4: 591606.
Yack, Bernard. 2006. “Rhetoric and Public Reasoning: An Aristotelian Understanding of Political Deliberation.” Political Theory 34, no. 4: 417–38.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed