Skip to main content

Thucydides the Constructivist

  • Richard Ned Lebow (a1)

The most superficial level of Thucydides’ history examines the destructive consequences of domestic and foreign policies framed outside the language of justice. His deeper political-philosophical aim was to explore the relationship between nomos (convention) and phusis (nature) and its implications for civilization. Thucydides concludes that nomos constructs identities and channels and restrains the behavior of individuals and societies. Speech and reason (logos) in turn make nomos possible because all conventions depend on shared meanings. The feedback loop between logoi (words) and ergoi (deeds) created Greek civilization but also the international and civil strife (stasis) associated with the Peloponnesian War. International security and civil order depend upon recovering the meanings of words and the conventions they enable. Thucydides should properly be considered a constructivist.

Hide All
Adcock, F. E. 1957. The Greek and Macedonian Art of War. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Aeschylus, . 1938. Agamemnon. In The Complete Greek Drama, vol. 1, ed. Whitney J. Oates and Eugene O’Neill, Jr. New York: Random House. Pp. 167225.
Alker, Hayward R. 1988. “The Dialectical Logic of Thucydides’ Melian Dialogue.American Political Science Review 82 (September): 80620.
Alker, Hayward R. 1996. Rediscoveries and Reformulations: Humanistic Methods for International Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Austin, J. L. 1975. How to Do Things with Words. 2d. ed., ed. J. O. Urmson and Marina Sbisà. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bedford, David, and Workman, Thom. 2001. “The Tragic Reading of the Thucydidean Tragedy.Review of International Studies 27 (January): 5167.
Beye, Charles Rowan. 1987. Ancient Greek Literature and Society. 2d rev. ed. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Bowersock, Glen P. 1965. “The Personality of Thucydides. Antioch Review 35 (1): 13545.
Bury, J. B., and Meiggs, Russell. 1975. A History of Greece to the Death of Alexander the Great. 4th rev. ed. New York: St. Martin’s.
Cochrane, Charles. 1929. Thucydides and the Science of History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Connor, W. Robert. 1984. Thucydides. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Cornford, F. M. 1907. Thucydides Mythistoricus. London: Arnold.
Crane, Gregory. 1998. Thucydides and the Ancient Simplicity: The Limits of Political Realism. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Democritus, . 1956. In Die Fragmente der Vorsakratiker, ed. Hermann DielsandWalther Kranz. Berlin: WeidmannscheVerlagsbuchhandlung. Pp. 567.
De Ste. Croix, G. E. M. 1972. The Origins of the Peloponnesian War. London: Duckworth.
Dionysus of Halicarnassus. 1975. On Thucydides. trans. W. Kendrick Pritchett. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Doyle, Michael W. 1997. Ways of War and Peace. New York: Norton.
Ellis, J. R. 1991. “The Structure and Argument of Thucydides’ Archeology.Classical Antiquity 10 (2): 34475.
Euben, J. Peter. 1990. The Tragedy of Political Theory: The Road Not Taken. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Finley, John H., Jr. [1942] 1967. Thucydides. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.International Organization 52 (Autumn): 887918.
Forde, Steven. 1989. The Ambition to Rule. Alcibiades and the Politics of Imperialism in Thucydides. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Forde, Steven. 1992. “Varieties of Realism: Thucydides and Machiavelli.Journal of Politics 54 (May): 37293.
Garst, Daniel. 1989. “Thucydides and NeorealismInternational Studies Quarterly 33 (1): 46997.
Gilpin, Robert. 1986. “The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism.” In Neorealism and Its Critics. ed. Keohane, Robert O.. New York: Columbia University Press. Pp. 30121.
Guthrie, W. K. C. 1969. A History of Greek Philosophy. 5 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Havelock, Eric A. 1963. Preface to Plato. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Herodotus, . 1958. The Histories of Herodotus of Halicarnassus. trans. Harry Carter. New York: Heritage Press.
Herwig, Holger H. 1997. The First World War: Germany and Austria-Hungary, 1914–1918. London: Arnold.
Homer, . 1951. The Iliad of Homer. trans. Richmond Lattimore. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hopf, Ted. N.d. Constructing International Relations at Home: Finding Allies in Moscow, 1995–1999. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Forthcoming.
Jaeger, Werner. 193945. Paideia: The Ideals of Greek Culture. 3 vols., trans. Gilbert Highet. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kagan, Donald. 1969. The Outbreak of the Peloponnesian War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Kerford, G. B. 1981. The Sophistic Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kokaz, Nancy 2001. “Moderating Power: A Thucydidean Perspective.Review of International Studies 27 (January): 2749.
Kratochwil, Friedrich V. 1989. Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Political and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kratochwil, Friedrich V., and John Gerard Ruggie. 1986. “International Organization: A State of the Art on an Art of the State,International Organization 49 (Autumn): 75375.
Lain Entralgo, Pedro. 1970. The Therapy of the Word in Classical Antiquity. ed. and trans. E. J. Rather and John M. Sharp. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Lebow, Richard Ned. 1991. “Thucydides, Power Transition Theory, and the Causes of War.” In Hegemonic Rivalry: From Thucydides to the Nuclear Age. ed. Richard Ned Lebow and Barry S. Strauss. Boulder, CO: Westview. Pp. 12568.
Lebow, Richard Ned. 1996. “Play It Again Pericles: Agents, Structures and the Peloponnesian War.European Journal of International Relations 2 (June): 23158.
Lebow, Richard Ned, and Robert Kelly. N.d. “‘Thucydides and Hegemony’: Athens and the United States.Review of International Studies 27 (October). Forthcoming.
Levy, Jack S. 1992. “An Introduction to Prospect Theory.Political Psychology 13 (June): 17186.
Levy, Jack S. 1996. “Loss Aversion, Framing and Bargaining: The Implications of Prospect Theory for International Conflict.International Political Science Review 17 (2): 17995.
Lloyd, Geoffrey E. R. 1978. Magic, Reason and Experience: Studies in the Origins and Development of Greek Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Luce, T. J. 1997. The Greek Historians. London: Routledge.
Meiggs, Russell. 1972. The Athenian Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Monoson, S. Sara, and Loriaux, Michael. 1998. “The Illusion of Power and the Disruption of Moral Norms: Thucydides’ Critique of Periclean Policy.American Political Science Review 92 (June): 28598.
Morgenthau, Hans J. [1951] 1982. In Defense of the National Interest: A Critical Examination of American Foreign Policy. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Murray, Williamson, and Millet, Allan R.. 2000. A War to Be Won: Fighting the Second World War. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ober, Josiah. 1989. Mass and Elite in Democratic Athens: Rhetoric, Ideology, and the Power of the People. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ober, Josiah. 1998. Political Dissent in Democratic Athens: Intellectual Critics of Popular Rule. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood. 1989. World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
Orwin, Clifford. 1994. The Humanity of Thucydides. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Perlman, Shalom. 1991. “Hegemony and Arche in Greece: Fourth-Century Views.” In Hegemonic Rivalry: From Thucydides to the Nuclear Age. ed. Richard Ned Lebow and Barry Strauss. Boulder, CO: Westview. Pp. 26986.
Rahe, Paul A. 1996. “Thucydides Critique of Realpolitik.” In Roots of Realism. ed. Benjamin Frankel. Portland, OR: Frank Cass. Pp. 10541.
Rawlings, Hunter R., III. 1981. The Structure of Thucydides. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Romilly, Jacqueline de. 1990. La construction de la vérité chez Thucydide. Paris: Julliard.
Saxonhouse, Arlene W. 1996. Athenian Democracy: Modern Myth-Makers and Ancient Theorists. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Searle, John R. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Free Press.
Stahl, Hans-Peter. 1966. Thucydides: Die Stellung des Menschen im geschichlichen Prozess. Munich: C. H. Beck.
Strauss, Barry S. 1986. Athens after the Peloponnesian War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Thucydides, . 1996. The Landmark Thucydides: A Comprehensive Guide to the Peloponnesian War. ed. Robert B. Strassler. New York: Free Press.
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1992. “Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty.Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5 (2): 297323.
Wallace, W. P. 1964. “Thucydides.Phoenix 18 (4): 25161.
Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. The Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Weinberg, Gerhard L. 1994. A World at War: A Global History of World War II. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
White, James Boyd. 1984. When Words Lose Their Meaning: Constitutions and Reconstitutions of Language, Character and Community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 215 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 969 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd April 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.