Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

What's at Stake in the American Empire Debate

  • DANIEL H. NEXON (a1) and THOMAS WRIGHT (a1)
Abstract

Scholars of world politics enjoy well-developed theories of the consequences of unipolarity or hegemony, but have little to say about what happens when a state's foreign relations take on imperial properties. Empires, we argue, are characterized by rule through intermediaries and the existence of distinctive contractual relations between cores and their peripheries. These features endow them with a distinctive network-structure from those associated with unipolar and hegemonic orders. The existence of imperial relations alters the dynamics of international politics: processes of divide and rule supplant the balance-of-power mechanism; the major axis of relations shift from interstate to those among imperial authorities, local intermediaries, and other peripheral actors; and preeminent powers face special problems of legitimating their bargains across heterogeneous audiences. We conclude with some observations about the American empire debate, including that the United States is, overall, less of an imperial power than it was during the Cold War.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Daniel H. Nexon is Assistant Professor, Department of Government and School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University, 669 Intercultural Center, Washington, DC 20057 (dhn2@georgetown.edu).
Thomas Wright is a doctoral candidate in the Department of Government at Georgetown University, Washington DC 20057, and a research fellow at the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Boston, MA 02138.
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

BarkawiTarak. 2004. “On the Pedagogy of ‘Smal Wars’.” International Affairs80, 1: 1937.

BarkawiTarak, and MarkLaffey. 1999. “The Imperial Peace: Democracy, Force and Globalization.” European Journal of International Relations5(4): 40334.

BarnettMichael, and RaymondDuvall. 2005. “Power in International Politics.” International Organization59(1): 3975.

BeissingerMark R. 2002. Nationalist Mobilization and the Collapse of the Soviet State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

BruntP. A. 1965. “Reflections on British and Roman Imperialism.” Comparative Studies in Society and History7(3): 26788.

ChaceJames2002. “Imperial America and the Common Interest.” World Policy Journal19(1): 19.

CohenEliot A. 2004. “History and the Hyperpower.” Foreign Affairs83(4): 4963.

CoxMichael. 2004. “Empire, Imperialism and the Bush Doctrine.” Review of International Studies30(4): 585608.

DonnellyJack. 2006. “Sovereign Inequalities and Hierarchy in Anarchy: American Power and International Security.” European Journal of International Relations12(2): 13970.

FearonJames D. 1998. “Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation.” International Organization52(2): 269305.

FearonJames D., and David D.Laitin. 2004. “Neotrusteeship and the Problem of Weak States.” International Security28(4): 543.

FergusonNiall. 2003. “Hegemony or Empire?Foreign Affairs82, 5.

FreemanLinton C. 1977. “A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on Betweeness.” Sociometry40(1): 3541.

GaltungJohan. 1971. “A Structural Theory of Imperialism.” Journal of Peace Research8(2): 81117.

GilpinRobert. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

GoddardStacie E. 2006. “Uncommon Ground: Indivisible Territory and the Politics of Legitimation.” International Organization60, (1): 3568.

GouldRoger V. 1993. “Collective Action and Network Structure.” American Sociological Review58(2): 18296.

GouldRoger V., and Roberto M.Fernandez. 1989. “Structures of Mediation: A Formal Approach to Brokerage in Transaction Networks.” Sociological Methodology19: 89126.

HagerRobert P.Jr., and David A.Lake. 2000. “Balancing Empires: Competitive Decolonization in International Politics.” Security Studies9(3): 10848.

HalperinCharles J. 1983. “Russia and the Mongol Empire in Comparative Perspective.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies43(1): 23961.

HemmerChristopher J., and Peter J.Katzenstein. 2002. “Why is There No NATO in Asia? Collective Identity, Regionalism, and the Origins of Multilateralism.” International Organization56(3): 575607.

HobsonJohn M., and J. C.Sharman. 2005. “The Enduring Place of Hierarchy in World Politics: Tracing the Social Logics of Hierarchy and Political Change.” European Journal of International Relations11(1): 6398.

HuiVictoria Tin-bor. 2005. War and State Formation in Ancient China and Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

HurrellAndrew. 2005. “Pax Americana or the Empire of Insecurity?International Relations of the Asia-Pacific5(2): 15376.

KaganRobert. 1998. “The Benevolent Empire.” Foreign Policy(111): 2435.

KeenanEdward. 1986. “Muscovite Political Folkways.” Russian Review45(2): 11581.

KingCharles. 2003. “Crisis in the Caucasus: A New Look at Russia's Chechen Impasse.” Foreign Affairs82(2): 13439.

KoenigsbergerH. G.1955. “The Organization of Revolutionary Parties in France and the Netherlands During the Sixteenth Century.” Journal of Modern History27(4): 33351.

LakeDavid A. 1996. “Anarchy, Hierarchy and the Variety of International Relations.” International Organization50(1): 133.

LakeDavid A. 2003. “The New Sovereignty in International Relations.” International Studies Review5(3): 30324.

LangeMatthew. 2003. “Structural Holes and Structural Synergies: A Comparative-Historical Analysis of State-Society Relations and Development in Colonial Sierra Leone and Mauritius.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology44(4): 372407.

LayneChristopher. 1997. “From Preponderance to Offshore Balancing: America's Future Grand Strategy.” International Security22(1): 86124.

LemkeDouglas. 2002. Regions of War and Peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

LievenAnatol. 2002. “The Pressures on Pakistan.” Foreign Affairs81(1): 10610.

MastandunoMichael. 2005. “Hegemonic Order, September 11, and the Consequences of the Bush Revolution.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific5(2): 17796.

McFaulMichael. 2002. “Reconstructing Afghanistan.” Journal of Democracy13(1): 17175.

MercerJohn. 1995. “Anarchy and Identity.” International Organization49(2): 299352.

MontgomeryAlexander H.2005. “Proliferation Determinism or Pragmatism? How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb Network.” International Security30(2).

MotylAlexander J. 2006. “Is Everything Empire? Is Empire Everything?Comparative Politics38(2): 22949.

NewburyColin. 2003. Patrons, Clients, and Empire: Chieftancy and Over-rule in Asia, Africa, and the Pacific. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

NyeJoseph S.Jr., 2003. “U.S. Power and Strategy After Iraq.” Foreign Affairs82(4): 6073.

PadgettJohn F., and Christopher K.Ansell. 1993. “Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400–1434.” American Journal of Sociology98(6): 12591319.

PaulT. V. 2005. “Soft Balancing in the Age of U.S. Primacy.” International Security30(1): 4671.

Reus-SmitChristian. 1997. “Constructing Anarchy: The Constitutional Structure of International Society and the Nature of Fundamental Institutions.” International Organization51(4): 55589.

SchwellerRandall L. 2001. “The Problem of International Order Revisited: A Review Essay.” International Security26(1): 16186.

SimesDimitri. 2003. “America's Imperial Dilemma.” Foreign Affairs82(6): 91100.

StevensonWilliam B., and DannaGreenberg. 2000. “Agency and Social Networks: Strategies of Action in a Social Structure of Position, Opposition, and Opportunity.” Administrative Science Quarterly45(4): 65178.

TillyCharles. 2003. The Politics of Collective Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

WaltzKenneth. 2000. Structural Realism After the Cold War. International Security. 25: 541.

WatsonAdam. 1992. The Evolution of International Society. New York: Routledge.

WeberKatja. 1997. “Hierarchy amidst Anarchy: A Transaction Costs Approach to International Security Cooperation.” International Studies Quarterly41(2): 32140.

WellmanBarry. 1983. “Network Analysis: Some Basic Principles.” Sociological Theory1: 155200.

WendtAlexander. 1994. “Collective Identity Formation and the International State.” American Political Science Review88(2): 38497.

WendtAlexander, and DanielFriedheim. 1995. “Hierarchy under Anarchy: Informal Empire and the East German State.” International Organization49(4): 689721.

WhiteHarrison C., Scott A.Boorman, etal. 1976. “Social Structure from Multiple Networks. I. Blockmodels of Roles and Positions.” American Journal of Sociology81(4): 73080.

WohlforthWilliam C. 1999. “The Stability of a Unipolar World.” International Security24(1): 541.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 26
Total number of PDF views: 519 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1237 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 27th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.