Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T07:12:24.755Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Where Is the Schema? Going Beyond the “S” Word in Political Psychology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Jonathan Nagler
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University

Abstract

I show that restrictive registration laws do not dissuade individuals with lower levels of education from voting any more than individuals with higher levels of education. This finding contradicts the result reported in Wolfinger and Rosenstone's classic analysis of turnout. I show that their conclusion was actually an artifact of the methodology they employed. Examining predicted probabilities generated by a nonlinear model such as probit or logit may produce spurious results when used to determine interactive effects between two independent variables. By respecifying the model of turnout to explicitly include terms to test interactive hypotheses and reanalyzing the data from the 1972 Current Population Survey (as well as data from the 1984 survey), I show that in fact, no such substantive interactive effect between registration laws and individuals' level of education exists at the micro level.

Type
Research Notes
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Goldfeld, Stephen M., and Quandt, Richard E.. 1972. Nonlinear Methods in Econometrics. London: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Jaccard, James, Tunisi, Robert, and Wan, Choi K.. 1990. Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, no. 07–072. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google ScholarPubMed
Jacobson, Gary C. 1990. “The Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections: New Evidence for Old Arguments.American Journal of Political Science 34:334–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Paul E., Aldrich, John H., Miller, Gary J., Ostrom, Charles W., and Rohde, David W.. 1990. American Government. 2d ed.Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Maddala, G. S. 1983. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, Thomas E. 1990. The American Democracy. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Wolfinger, Raymond E., and Rosenstone, Steven J.. 1980. Who Votes? New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar