Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Why Arms Control Is So Rare

  • ANDREW J. COE (a1) and JANE VAYNMAN (a2)

Abstract

Arming is puzzling for the same reason war is: it produces outcomes that could instead be realized through negotiation, without the costly diversion of resources arming entails. Despite this, arms control is exceedingly rare historically, so that arming is ubiquitous and its costs to humanity are large. We develop and test a theory that explains why arming is so common and its control so rare. The main impediment to arms control is the need for monitoring that renders a state’s arming transparent enough to assure its compliance but not so much as to threaten its security. We present evidence that this trade-off has undermined arms control in three diverse contexts: Iraq’s weapons programs after the Gulf War, great power competition in arms in the interwar period, and superpower military rivalry during the Cold War. These arms races account for almost 40% of all global arming in the past two centuries.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Andrew J. Coe, Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Vanderbilt University, andrew.coe@vanderbilt.edu.
Jane Vaynman, Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Temple University, jane.vaynman@temple.edu.

Footnotes

Hide All

We thank Taylor Dalton for assistance with this research and James Fearon for comments on an earlier draft.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Baliga, Sandeep, and Sjöström, Tomas. 2008. “Strategic Ambiguity and Arms Proliferation.” Journal of Political Economy 116 (6): 1023–57.
Bas, Muhammet A., and Coe, Andrew J.. 2016. “A Dynamic Theory of Nuclear Proliferation and Preventive War.” International Organization 70 (4): 655–85.
Bas, Muhammet A., and Coe, Andrew J.. 2018. “Give Peace a (Second) Chance: A Theory of Nonproliferation Deals.” International Studies Quarterly 62 (3): 606–17.
Benson, Brett, and Wen, Quan. 2011. “A Bargaining Model of Nuclear Weapons Development and Disarmament.” In Causes and Consequences of Nuclear Proliferation, eds. Rauchhaus, Robert, Kroenig, Matthew, and Gartzke, Erik. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis, 45–62.
Brands, Hal, and Palkki, David. 2011. “Saddam, Israel, and the Bomb: Nuclear Alarmism Justified?International Security 36 (1): 133–66.
British Cabinet. 1921. Washington Disarmament Conference. Memoranda. Vol. I. The National Archives of the United Kingdom, CAB 30/5.
British Cabinet. 1921–22. Conference on Limitation of Armaments, Washington, 1921–22: Plenary Sessions. Stenographic Notes. The National Archives of the United Kingdom, CAB 30/3.
British Cabinet. 1932. Memorandum by the Admiralty on Subjects Other than Direct Naval Limitation. The National Archives of the United Kingdom, CAB 27/509.
British Cabinet. 1933. Conclusions of a Meeting of the Committee Held in the Prime Minister’s Room, House of Commons, on Monday, 19th June, 1933 at 6.30 p.m. The National Archives of the United Kingdom, CAB 27/505.
Cameron, James. 2018. The Double Game: The Demise of America’s First Missile Defense System and the Rise of Strategic Arms Limitation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Carnegie, Allison, and Carson, Austin. 2018. “The Spotlight’s Harsh Glare: Rethinking Publicity and International Order.” International Organization 72 (3): 627–57.
Carnegie, Allison, and Carson, Austin. 2019. “The Disclosure Dilemma: Nuclear Intelligence and International Organizations.” American Journal of Political Science 63 (2): 269–85.
Central Intelligence Agency. 1951. Special Estimate: Intelligence Implications of a Census and Verification of Armed Forces and Armaments. FOIA Electronic Reading Room: National Intelligence Council (NIC) Collection. Document Number (FOIA)/ESDN (CREST): 0000170378.
Coe, Andrew J. 2018. “Containing Rogues: A Theory of Asymmetric Arming.” The Journal of Politics 80 (4): 1197–210.
Coe, Andrew J., and Vaynman, Jane. 2015. “Collusion and the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime.” The Journal of Politics 77 (4): 983–97.
Cubitt, B. B. 1921. Annex III to No. 815: War Office to Foreign Office. Documents on British Foreign Policy 1919–39 Ser. 1, Vol. 16, Ch. 7.
Dai, Xinyuan. 2002. “Information Systems in Treaty Regimes.” World Politics 54 (4): 405–36.
Dai, Xinyuan. 2007. International Institutions and National Policies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Debs, Alexandre, and Monteiro, Nuno P.. 2014. “Known Unknowns: Power Shifts, Uncertainty, and War.” International Organization 68 (1): 1–31.
Department of State. 1999. Saddam Hussein’s Iraq. United States Government.
Downs, George W., and Rocke, David M.. 1990. Tacit Bargaining, Arms Races, and Arms Control. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Dunn, Lewis A. 1990. “Arms Control Verification: Living with Uncertainty.” International Security 14 (4): 165–75.
Fearon, James D. 1995. “Rationalist Explanations for War.” International Organization 49 (3): 379–414.
Fearon, James D. 2011. “Arming and Arms Races.” Paper presented at the 2010 Annual Meetings of the American Political Science Association. Washington, DC.
Fearon, James D. 2018. “Cooperation, Conflict, and the Costs of Anarchy.” International Organization 72 (3): 523–59.
Flint, Alexander. 1921. Annex V to No. 815. Documents on British Foreign Policy 1919–39 Ser. 1, Vol. 16, Ch. 7.
Foreign Office. 1921. The Marquess Curzon of Kedleston to Mr. Balfour (Washington Delegation) No. 7 Telegraphic [A 8510/18/45]. Documents on British Foreign Policy 1919–39. Ser. 1, Vol. 14, Ch. 6.
Foreign Office. 1925. Memorandum on the Future of Air Control in Germany. Documents on British Foreign Policy 1919–39 Ser. 1A, Vol. 1, Ch. 2.
Fuller, Joseph V. eds., Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, 1922, Volume I. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office. Document 88.
Gallagher, Nancy W. 1997. The Politics of Verification: Why ‘how Much?’ Is Not Enough. Contemporary Security Policy 18 (2): 138–70.
Gallagher, Nancy W. 1999. The Politics of Verification. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Goldblat, Jozef. 2002. Arms Control: The New Guide to Negotiations and Agreements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Goldman, Emily O. 1994. Sunken Treaties: Naval Arms Control between the Wars. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Harvey, Frank P. 2011. Explaining the Iraq War: Counterfactual Theory, Logic and Evidence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Iraq Intelligence Commission. 2005. Report of the Commission on the Intelligence Capabilities of the United States Regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction. Unclassified Version, March 31.
Iraq Survey Group. 2004. Comprehensive Report of the Special Advisor to the DCI on Iraq’s WMD. Unclassified Version, September 30.
Jackson, Matthew O., and Morelli, Massimo. 2009. “Strategic Militarization, Deterrence and Wars.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 4 (4): 279–313.
Kaufman, Robert Gordon. 1990. Arms Control During the Pre-Nuclear Era. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Kilgour, D. Marc. 1994. “The Use of Costless Inspection in Enforcement.” Theory and Decision 36 (3): 207–32.
Kitching, Carolyn J. 2003. Britain and the Problem of International Disarmament: 1919–1934. New York, NY: Routledge.
Koblentz, Gregory D. 2018. “Saddam versus the Inspectors: The Impact of Regime Security on the Verification of Iraq’s WMD Disarmament.” Journal of Strategic Studies 41 (3): 372–409.
Koremenos, Barbara. 2001. “Loosening the Ties that Bind: A Learning Model of Agreement Flexibility.” International Organization 55 (2): 289–325.
Krass, Allan S. 1985. “The Politics of Verification.” World Policy Journal 2 (4): 731–52.
Kreps, Sarah E. 2016. “The Institutional Design of Arms Control Agreements.” Foreign Policy Analysis 14 (1): 127–47.
Kydd, Andrew. 1997. “Game Theory and the Spiral Model.” World Politics 49 (3): 371–400.
Kydd, Andrew. 2000. “Arms Races and Arms Control: Modeling the Hawk Perspective.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (2): 228–44.
Lindsey, David. 2015. “Military Strategy, Private Information, and War.” International Studies Quarterly 59 (4): 629–40.
Long, Austin. 2015. “If You Really Want to Bomb Iran, Take the Deal.” Washington Post (April 3).
Maiolo, Joseph. 2016. “Between the Two World Wars: Introduction.” In Arms Races in International Politics: From the Nineteenth to the Twenty-First Century, eds. Mahnken, Thomas G., Maiolo, Joseph, and Stevenson, David. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 61–8.
Maurer, John D. 2018. “The Purposes of Arms Control.” Texas National Security Review 2 (1).
Maurer, John H. 1994. “Arms Control and the Washington Conference.” In The Washington Conference, 1921–1922: Naval Rivalry, East Asian Stability and the Road to Pearl Harbor, eds. Goldstein, Erik and Maurer, John. New York, NY: Routledge, 267–93.
Meirowitz, Adam, and Sartori, Anne E.. 2008. “Strategic Uncertainty as a Cause of War.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 3 (4): 327–52.
Overy, Richard. 2016. “Aircraft and the Arms Race between the World Wars.” In Arms Races in International Politics: From the Nineteenth to the Twenty-First Century, eds. Mahnken, Thomas G., Maiolo, Joseph, and Stevenson, David. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 115–33.
Pollack, Kenneth M. 2002. The Threatening Storm: The Case for Invading Iraq. New York, NY: Random House.
Powell, Robert. 1993. “Guns, Butter, and Anarchy.” American Political Science Review 87 (1): 115–32.
Richelson, Jeffrey T. 2007. Spying on the Bomb: American Nuclear Intelligence from Nazi Germany to Iran and North Korea. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
Slantchev, Branislav L. 2010. “Feigning Weakness.” International Organization 64 (3): 357–88.
Stiglitz, Joseph E., and Bilmes, Linda J.. 2008. The Three Trillion Dollar War: The True Cost of the Iraq Conflict. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
Vaynman, Jane. 2014. “Enemies in Agreement: Domestic Politics, Uncertainty, and Cooperation between Adversaries.” PhD thesis, Harvard University.
Verdier, Daniel. 2008. “Multilateralism, Bilateralism, and Exclusion in the Nuclear Proliferation Regime.” International Organization 62 (3): 439–76.
Wittman, Donald. 1989. “Arms Control Verification and Other Games Involving Imperfect Detection.” American Political Science Review 83 (3): 923–45.
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Coe and Vaynman supplementary material
Coe and Vaynman supplementary material

 PDF (342 KB)
342 KB

Why Arms Control Is So Rare

  • ANDREW J. COE (a1) and JANE VAYNMAN (a2)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed