Hostname: page-component-5d84bcc8dc-gdnkh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-09-08T23:56:19.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Luis Nicolau Parés: Reply to the Review of J. Lorand Matory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2015

Luis Nicolau Parés
Luis Nicolau Parés*
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal da BahiaSalvador, Bahia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Professor J. Lorand Matory's thorough critique of the English translation of my book, which was first published in Brazil in 2006, did not come to me as a complete surprise. He and I have known each other for some years, and we have shared with each other interests in the cultural history of Candomblé, in particular the place and role of the Jeje nation. We have discussed our interpretative divergences in private and in public, and I have referred to some of them in writing (Nagôization, 2005; Birth, 2005; Formation). I do appreciate and feel honored that such a distinguished scholar has devoted some of his precious time to reviewing my book, giving me the chance to revisit my over-a-decade-old argument in the light of his provoking challenges. Yet, after reading his essay (certainly more than a standard review), I wondered why he had taken the effort to write 15 single-spaced pages of meticulous criticism on a work he ultimately dismisses as theoretically old-fashioned and full of errors and inconsistencies. If it is so worthless, why care about it in the first place?

Information

Type
Scholarly Exchange
Information
The Americas , Volume 72 , Issue 4 , October 2015 , pp. 628 - 641
Copyright
Copyright © Academy of American Franciscan History 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Carneiro, Edson. Candomblés da Bahia. Salvador: Ediouro, 1985 [1948].Google Scholar
Castillo, Lisa Earl. “Entre memória, mito e história: viajantes transatlânticos da Casa Branca.” In Escravidão e suas sombras, edited by Reis, J. J. and Azevedo, E., pp. 65–110. Salvador: EDUFBA, 2012.Google Scholar
Castillo, Lisa Earl. Entre a oralidade e a escrita: a etnografia nos Candomblés da Bahia. Salvador: EDUFBA, 2010.Google Scholar
Castillo, Lisa Earl. “O Terreiro do Alaketu e seus fundadores: história e genealogia familiar, 1807–1867. Afro-Ásia 43 (2011), pp. 213–259.Google Scholar
Castillo, Lisa Earl, and Parés, Luis Nicolau. “Marcelina da Silva: A Candomblé Priestess in Bahia.” Slavery & Abolition 31:1 (2010), pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
Castro, José Guilherme da Cunha (org.). Miguel Santana. Salvador: EDUFBA, 1996.Google Scholar
Dantas, Beatriz Góis. Vovó Nagô e Papai Branco. Usos e abusos da África no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Graal, [1982] 1988.Google Scholar
Ferraz, Aydano do Couto. “Vestígios de um culto daomeano no Brasil.” Revista do Arquivo Municipal 76 (1941), pp. 271–275.Google Scholar
Herskovits, Melville J.Dahomey. An Ancient West African Kingdom. 2 vols. New York: J. J. Augustin, 1938.Google Scholar
Herskovits, Melville J. and Herskovits, Frances. An Outline of Dahomean Religious Belief. Memoirs of the American Anthropological Association 41 (1933).Google Scholar
Lohse, Kent Russell. “Africans and Their Descendants in Colonial Costa Rica, 1600–1750.” PhD diss.: University of Texas at Austin, 2005.Google Scholar
Matory, J. Lorand. “Afro-Atlantic Culture: On the Live Dialogue between Africa and the Americas.” In Africana: The Encyclopedia of the African and African American Experience, edited by Gates, Henry Louis and Appiah, K. Anthony, pp. 36–44. New York: Basic Books, 1999a.Google Scholar
Matory, J. Lorand. Black Atlantic Religion: Tradition, Transnationalism and Matriarchy in the Afro-Brazilian Candomblé. Princeton and London: Princeton University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Matory, J. Lorand. “Jeje: Repensando Nações e Transnacionalismo.” Mana: Estudos de Antropologia Social 5:1, pp. 57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matory, J. Lorand. “The ‘New World’ Surrounds an Ocean: On the Live Dialogue between African and African-American Cultures.” In Afro-Atlantic Dialogues: Anthropology in the Diaspora, edited by Yelvington, Kevin, pp. 151–192. Santa Fe, N.M.: School of American Research, 2006.Google Scholar
Nascimento, Luiz Claudio, and Isodoro, Cristiana. A Boa Morte em Cachoeira. Contribuição para um estudo etnológico. Cachoeira: Centro de Estudos, Pesquisa e Ação Sócio-Cultural de Cachoeira (CEPASC), 1988.Google Scholar
Olinto, Antônio. Brasileiros na África, 2nd ed.São Paulo: Edições G.R.D, [1964] 1980.Google Scholar
Oliveira, Waldir Freitas, and da Costa Lima, Vivaldo, eds. Cartas de Édison Carneiro a Artur Ramos. De 4 de janeiro de 1936 a 6 de dezembro de 1938. Salvador: Corrupio, 1987.Google Scholar
Parés, Luis Nicolau. “The Birth of the Yoruba Hegemony in Post-Abolition Candomblé.” Journal de la Société des Américanistes, 91:1, (2005), pp. 139–159.Google Scholar
Parés, Luis Nicolau. “Militiamen, Barbers and Slave-Traders: Mina and Jeje Africans in a Catholic Brotherhood (Bahia, 1770–1830).” Revista Tempo 20 (2014), pp. 1–32.Google Scholar
Parés, Luis Nicolau. “The Nagôization Process in Bahian Candomblé.” In The Yoruba Diaspora in the Atlantic World, edited by Falola, T. and Childs, M., pp. 185–208. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Ramos, Artur. As culturas negras no novo mundo. São Paulo: Editora Nacional, [1937] 1979.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, Raimundo Nina. Os Africanos no Brasil. São Paulo: Editora Nacional, [1932] 1977.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, Raimundo Nina. O animismo fetichista dos negros bahianos. Rio de Janeiro. Civilização Brasileira, [1896] 1935.Google Scholar
Wimberly, Fayette. “The Expansion of Afro-Bahian Religious Practices in Nineteenth-Century Cachoeira.” In Afro-Brazilian Culture and Politics, edited by Kraay, H., pp. 74–89. Armonk, N.Y., and London: M. E. Sharpe, 1998.Google Scholar