Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-564cf476b6-s5ssh Total loading time: 0.262 Render date: 2021-06-22T11:53:21.575Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

A Peripteros of the Geometric Period in the Artemision of Ephesus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

Extract

It was in 1908 that D. G. Hogarth first published information about a “Central Basis” (Pl. XI (a), Fig. 1) that he had excavated in 1904 and 1905 in the Artemision at Ephesus, and for many decades his words remained the authoritative statement concerning the early sanctuaries not only in Ephesus, but also in the rest of the classical world. A colloquium in the British Museum in 1984, however, demonstrated that there were issues, raised by numismatists and art historians, that continued to be at odds with the results of Hogarth's excavations, and that could only be solved by a further examination of the “central basis” in question.

As early as 1986, under the northern outer rim of the crepidoma of the archaic dipteros (Croesus temple), a square base had been discovered which obviously formed the centre of a distinct cult area. A flood stratum of sand, which was typical of all the parts of the Artemision we had excavated, appeared under the base. Fortunately, the low level of the ground water made it possible to measure this stratum (66 cm.) and to observe beneath it a new culture stratum—a pavement made of yellow marly limestone slabs—that had previously escaped detection. This observation gave rise to the hope that more discoveries could be expected under Hogarth's “central basis”.

Type
Research Article
Information
Anatolian Studies , Volume 40 , December 1990 , pp. 137 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute at Ankara 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

1 Hogarth, D. G. (ed.) Excavations at Ephesus (1908)Google Scholar

2 Kagan, D., AJA 86, 1982, 351CrossRefGoogle Scholar ff. and Price, M., in: Studies in Numismatic Method, presented to P. Grierson (1983) 1 ffGoogle Scholar. I would also like to thank S. Morris and A. Johnston for their considerable help and the British Academy for making it possible to me to do research in England in 1989. A first draft of the translation of this article was made by R. D. McGirr.

3 ÖJh 58, 1988, 1 ffGoogle Scholar.

4 Hogarth op. cit. 55 ff.; Atlas Pl. I, II; It is interesting that Löwy, E., SBWien 213, 1932, 3 ffGoogle Scholar. dated the base A (also B and C) in the Kroisos period. In doing this he was correct.

5 ÖJh 58, 1988Google Scholar, Beibl. 15, Abb. 16

6 ÖJh 58, 1988Google Scholar, Beibl. 11, Fig. 12 a, b; B. V. Head apud Hogarth op. cit. 74 ff.

7 ÖJh 58, 1988Google Scholar, Beibl. 11, Abb. 13, 14.

8 ÖJh 58, 1988Google Scholar, Beibl. 11, Abb. 12 a, b.

9 Juley, I. I., OpuscRom 6, 1968Google Scholar, Pl. 8 (reference from B. Shefton).

10 Hogarth op. cit. Pl. XLVII f.; Strong, D. E., Catalogue of the Carved Amber (BM Cat., 1966) 41 ffGoogle Scholar., Pl. If.

11 Le Monde de la Bible 64, 1990, 10 ffGoogle Scholar, RA 1991 (in press).

12 Reference from W. D. Niemeier; for the Bronze Age in Ephesos, ÖJh 57, 1986/1987, Beibl. 1 ffGoogle Scholar.

13 Heilmeyer, W.-D., Frühe olympische Tonfiguren, OlForsch. VII (1972)Google Scholar; in addition drilled bear's teeth used as amulets were also found, see Bammer in: Ehalt, H. C. (ed.) Volksfrömmigkeit (1989) 46Google Scholar and fig. 1; Beaven, E., BSA 82, 1987, 17 ffGoogle Scholar.

14 Following an idea of J. Coulton.

15 Price op. cit.; Kagan op. cit.

16 See above, note 10.

17 Bammer, in: Festschrift J. B. Trentini, Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Kulturwissenschaft (1990)Google Scholar; Caner, E., Fibeln in Anatolien (1983)Google Scholar.

18 ÖJh 58, 1988Google Scholar, Beibl. 26 f., Abb. 30 f.

19 Concerning the origin of amber in general: Strong op. cit. 7 ff.; Catacchio, N. Negroni, Padusa 20, 1984, 91 ff.Google Scholar; Rottländer, R. C. A., Acta Praeh. et Arch. 4, 1973, 1 ff.Google Scholar; Harding, A., Hughes-Brock, H., mit Anhang von, C., Beck, W., BSA 69, 1974, 145 ff.Google Scholar; Beck, , Savaria 16, 1982, 11 ff.Google Scholar; Beck, , Sprincz, E., Acta Arch. Hung. 35, 1983, 171 ff.Google Scholar; Malinowski, T., Savaria 16, 1982, 11 ff.Google Scholar; Bouzek, J., “The Aegean, Anatolia, and Europe”, SIMA 29, 1985, 54 ff.Google Scholar; Hughes-Brock, , J. of Baltic Studies 16, 1985CrossRefGoogle Scholar (reference from H. Hughes-Brock).

20 For women's jewelry with amber teardrops, of the archaic graves of Chiaramonte in Basilicata: Bianco, S., in Archeologia, Arte e Storia alle Sorgenti del Lao (Catalogo della Mostra), Matera (1988) a cura di Paola Bottini, 89 ff.Google Scholar esp. fig. 36; Catacchio, N. Negroni in: Un decennio di Ricerche archeologiche II Quad. Ric. Scient. 100, Roma (1978) 175 ffGoogle Scholar. (reference from A. Mastrocinque)

21 ÖJh 58, 1988Google Scholar, Beibl. 26 Abb. 25–27, 30 ff.

22 Seiterle, G., Antike Welt 10, 1979, 3 ff.Google Scholar; Fleischer, R., AA 1983, 81 ff.Google Scholar; Alroth, B., Greek Gods and Figurines (Boreas 18, Uppsala, 1989), 25 ffGoogle Scholar.

23 Buchner, G., Boardman, J., JdI 8l, 1966, 1 ff.Google Scholar; Hölbl, G., Beziehungen der ägyptischen Kultur zu Altitalien, 1 (1979) 222 fGoogle Scholar. (EPRO)

24 Concerning the tree of life in the ancient orient: Kepenski, Chr., L'arbre stylisé en Asie occidentale au 2e mill. a. J. C. (1982)Google Scholar

25 The excavation in 1989 made it clear that also to the north and south of the “central basis” only one row of columns had existed; it is worth mentioning, however, that Schaber, W., Die archaischen Tempel der Artemis von Ephesos (1982)Google Scholar postulated a dipteral design for Hogarth's temple C.

26 Mallwitz, A., AA 1981, 599 ff. esp. 624 ff.Google Scholar; Fagerström, K., Greek Iron Age Architecture (1985) 85 f.Google Scholar; Martini, W., JdI 101, 1986, 63 ffGoogle Scholar.

27 Drerup, H. in Festschrift F. Hiller (1986) 3 ff.Google Scholar; Ainian, A. J. Mazarakis, in Early Greek Cult Practice ed. Hägg, R., Marinatos, N., Nordquist, G. C. (1988) 105 ff.Google Scholar; also Bammer, in: Archéologie de l'espace sacrificielle dans l'Antiquité classique (1990)Google Scholar in print

28 Rupp, D. W., Greek Altars of the Northeastern Peloponnese (UMI, 1980)Google Scholar, ders., in Archéologie de l'espace sacrificielle loc. cit.

29 Drerup in Festschrift F. Matz (1962) 32 ffGoogle Scholar.

30 I would like to thank my following co-workers: G. Hochholdinger, Ch. Ertel, N. Patocka, G. Grabherr, J. Fürnholzer, M. Philipp, R. Posamentir, U. Arikan, F. Polat, B. Ulutuğ, W. Dollhäubl, J. Krämmer, C. Kralik, U. Muss, C. Meran-Kahane, M. Laubenberger, F. X. Prasczaits and E. Karhan. Apart from the budgeted funds of the Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft und Forschung, the Artemision project was sponsored by the following institutions: Fonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Hochschuljubiläumsstiftung der Stadt Wien, Gesellschaft der Freunde von Ephesos, Jubiläumsfonds der Österreichischen Nationalbank, and Incentive Tours.

3
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

A Peripteros of the Geometric Period in the Artemision of Ephesus
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

A Peripteros of the Geometric Period in the Artemision of Ephesus
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

A Peripteros of the Geometric Period in the Artemision of Ephesus
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *