Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T16:51:07.157Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Discussion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2008

George L. Cowgill
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA

Abstract

To begin the discussion, I propose distinctions between four archaeological approaches to time. I call these clock time, phase time, social time, and characterization. Main points in the other papers are that Postclassic phases tend to be a century or more earlier than recently thought, that Aztec I may be much earlier than thought, and that there may be considerable temporal overlap among Postclassic phases. The evidence is fairly good for the first of these points, but less clear for the other two—more data are needed. I propose a slightly revised Teotihuacan chronology and mention some issues about the nature of the Teotihuacan to post-Teotihuacan transition.

Type
Special Section: Recent Chronological Research in Central Mexico
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barbour, Warren 1987 Ceramic Figurines from Oxtoticpac. In The Toltec Period Occupation of the Valley, edited by Sanders, William T., pp. 697754. Surface Survey and Special Studies. The Teotihuacan Valley Project Final Report, vol. 4, pt. 2. Department of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park.Google Scholar
Blalock, Hubert M. Jr., 1979 Social Statistics, rev. 2nd ed.McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Braswell, Geoffrey E. 1992 Obsidian-Hydration Dating, the Coner Phase, and Revisionist Chronology at Copán, Honduras. Latin American Antiquity 3:130147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowgill, George L. 1974 Quantitative Studies of Urbanization at Teotihuacan. In Meso-american Archaeology: New Approaches, edited by Hammond, Norman, pp. 363396. Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
Diehl, Richard A. 1989 A Shadow of Its Former Self: Teotihuacan During the Coyotlatelco Period. In Mesoamerica After the Decline of Teotihuacan, a.d. 700–900, edited by Diehl, Richard A. and Berlo, Janet Catherine, pp. 918. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Evans, Susan Toby, and Freter, AnnCorinne 1996 Teotihuacan Valley, Mexico, Postclassic Chronology: Hydration Analysis of Obsidian From Cihuatecpan, an Aztec-Period Village. Ancient Mesoamerica 7:267280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosden, Christopher 1994 Social Being and Time. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hare, Timothy S., and Smith, Michael E. 1996 A New Postclassic Chronology for Yautepec, Morelos. Ancient Mosoamerica 7:281297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manzanilla, Linda, López, Claudia, and Freter, AnnCorinne 1996 Dating Results From Excavations in Quarry Tunnels Behind the Pyramid of the Sun at Teotihuacan. Ancient Mesoamerica 7:245266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCafferty, Geoffrey G. 1996 The Ceramics and Chronology of Cholula, Mexico. Ancient Mesoamerica 7:299323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millon, René 1959 Chronological and Developmental Classifications in Mesoamerican Prehistory. Paper delivered at the annual meeting of the American Anthropological Association. Mexico City.Google Scholar
Millon, René 1976 Chronological and Developmental Terminology: Why They Must be Divorced. In The Valley of Mexico: Studies in Pre-Hispanic Ecology and Society, edited by Wolf, Eric R., pp. 2327. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Millon, René 1981 Teotihuacan: City, State, and Civilization. In Archaeology, edited by Sabloff, Jeremy A., pp. 198243. Supplement to the Handbook of Middle American Indians, vol. 1. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Nichols, Deborah L., and Charlton, Thomas H. 1996 The Postclassic Occupation at Otumba: A Chronological Assessment. Ancient Mesoamerica 7:213244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Jeffrey R., Brumfiel, Elizabeth, and Hodge, Mary 1996 Developmental Implications of Earlier Dates for Early Aztec in the Basin of Mexico. Ancient Mesoamerica 7:217230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Barbara 1976 A Chronological Framework for Cultural Development in Mesoamerica. In The Valley of Mexico: Studies in Pre-Hispanic Ecology and Society, edited by Wolf, Eric R., pp. 1321. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Rattray, Evelyn Childs 1991 Fechamientos por radiocarbono en Teotihuacan. Arqueología 6:318. Dirección de Arqueología del Institute Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Rice, Don S. (editor) 1993 Latin American Horizons. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Rowe, John Howland 1962 Stages and Periods in Archaeological Interpretation. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 18:4054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, William T. 1986 Ceramic Chronology. In The Toltec Period Occupation of the Valley, edited by Sanders, William T., pp. 367373. Excavation and Ceramics. The Teotihuacan Valley Project Final Report, vol. 4, pt. 1. Department of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park.Google Scholar
Sanders, William T., Parsons, Jeffrey R., and Santley, Robert S. 1979 The Basin of Mexico: Ecological Processes in the Evolution of a Civilization. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Scott, Sue 1993 Teotihuacan Mazapan Figurines and the Xipe Totec Statue: A Link Between the Basin of Mexico and the Valley of Oaxaca. Publications in Anthropology No. 44. Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
Smith, Michael E. 1992 Braudel's Temporal Rhythms and Chronology Theory in Archaeology. In Archaeology, Annales, and Ethnohistory, edited by Knapp, A. Bernard, pp. 2334. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugiyama, Saburo 1994 Cronología de eventes ocurridos en el Templo de Quetzalcoatl. In Taller de discusión de la cronología de Teotihuacan, edited by Rosa, Brambila P. and Rubén, Cabrera C.Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Mexico City, in press.Google Scholar
Willey, Gordon R., and Phillips, Philip 1958 Method and Theory in American Archaeology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar