Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Choice of probing site for classification of live pigs using ultrasonic measurements

  • B. Hulsegge (a1), G. Mateman (a1), G. S. M. Merkus (a1) and P. Walstra (a1)
Abstract

Body length and ultrasonic fat thickness measurements were taken on 86 live pigs in order to find an optimal probing site for estimation of lean meat proportion. The next day pigs were slaughtered and measurements with the Hennessy Grading Probe (HGP) were made in order to estimate the lean meat proportion.

Fat thickness, 6 cm off the dorsal mid line, increased from a value of 9·5 mm at a site 4 cm cranial to the last rib, progressively through intermediate sites to a value of 12·4 mm, 22 cm cranial to the last rib. Fat thickness measurements at different sites (live pigs) were highly correlated with HGP fat thickness at the site between 3rd and 4th from last rib (3/4 LR) and estimated lean meat proportion (carcasses); correlations ranged from 0.80 to 0.89 and -071 to -0.85 respectively. The most accurate predictor of estimated lean meat proportion from the live pig measurements was the measurement at 18 cm cranial to the last rib. Measurement at the site half the distance between the occipital bone and the base of the tail (midpoint) was the second-best for estimated lean meat proportion.

Generally, this midpoint on live pigs was situated around the 3/4 LR on carcasses. However, the range was considerable. Half of the number of animals had a midpoint in the range of -2.5 to 2.5 cm from 3/4 LR. The site midpoint is easily located on the animal and the results of this study suggest that it can be used as an accurate predictor of estimated lean meat proportion. Therefore it can serve as the probing site for classification of live pigs.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Alliston, J. C., Kempster, A. J., Owen, M. G. and Ellis, M. 1982. An evaluation of three ultrasonic machines for predicting the body composition of live pigs of the same breed, sex and live weight. Animal Production 35: 165169.
Box, G. E. P. 1950. Problems in the analysis of growth and wear curves. Biometrics 6: 362389.
European Community. 1985. EC document no. 2967185, determining the Community scale for grading pig carcasses.
Fortin, A. 1986. Development of backfat and individual fat layers in the pig and its relationship with carcass lean. Meat Science 18: 225270.
Fortin, A., Jones, S. D. M. and Haworth, C. R. 1984. Pork carcass grading: a comparison of the New Zealand Hennessy Grading Probe and the Danish Fat-O-Meater. Meat Science 10: 131144.
Fortin, A., Sim, D. W. and Talbot, S. 1980. Ultrasonic measurements of backfat thickness at different locations and positions on the warm pork carcass and comparisons of ruler and ultrasonic procedures. Canadian journal of Animal Science 60: 635641.
Genstat 5 Committee. 1993. Genstat 5 release 3 reference manual. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Gresham, J. D., McPeake, S. R., Bernard, J. K. and Henderson, H. H. 1992. Commercial adaptation of ultrasonography to predict pork carcass composition from live animal and carcass measurements. Journal of Animal Science 70: 631639.
Hulsegge, B. and Merkus, G. S. M. 1997. A comparison of the optical probe HGP and the ultrasonic devices Renco and Pie Medical for estimation of the lean meat proportion in pig carcasses. Animal Science 64: 379383.
Jones, S. D. M., Allen, O.B. and Haworth, C. R. 1982. The accuracy of two recording instruments in the measurements of subcutaneous fat thickness in pork carcasses. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 62: 731738.
Kempster, A. J. and Evans, D. G. 1979. A comparison of different predictors of the lean content of pig carcasses. Animal Production 28: 8796.
Krieter, J. and Kalm, E. 1991. An evaluation of two ultrasonic instruments for the prediction of carcass lean grade in growing pigs. Animal Production 52: 361366.
Sather, A. P., Martin, A. H., Jolly, R. W. and Fredeen, H. T. 1980. Alternative market weights for swine. I. Feedlot performance. Journal of Animal Science 51: 2836.
Sather, A. P., Tong, A. K. W. and Harbison, D. S. 1986. A study of ultrasonic probing techniques for swine. I. The effect of operator, machine and site. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 66: 591598.
Terry, C. A., Savell, J. W., Recio, H. A. and Cross, H. R. 1989. Using ultrasound technology to predict pork carcass composition. Journal of Animal Science 67: 12791284.
Turlington, L. M. 1990. Live animal evaluation of swine and sheep using ultrasonics. M.Sc. thesis, Kansas State University, Manhattan.
Zhang, W., Huiskes, J. H. and Ramaekers, P. J. L. 1993. Serial ultrasonic measurements of backfat thickness in growing finishing pigs. I. Location determination of serial ultrasonic measurements. Pig News and Information 14: 173N176N.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Animal Science
  • ISSN: 1357-7298
  • EISSN: 1748-748X
  • URL: /core/journals/animal-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 3 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 47 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 13th June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.