Skip to main content
×
Home

The effect of litter size and littermate weight on pre-weaning performance of low-birth-weight piglets that have been cross-fostered

  • J. G. H. English (a1) and G. Bilkeit (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

To evaluate the effect of litter size and littermate weight on low-birth-weight (< 1 kg) piglets that have been cross-fostered, piglets' pre-weaning performance in the following groups were compared. Group A (no. = 10), low-birth-weight piglets raised with equal number of heavy-birth-weight piglets in small (eight piglets) litters; group B (no. = 10), low-birth-weight piglets raised with equal number of heavy-birth-weight piglets in large (12 piglets) litters; group C (no. = 10), low-birth-weight piglets raised with equal number of average-birth-weight piglets in small (eight piglets) litters; D (no. = 10), low-birth-weight piglets raised with equal number of average-birth-weight piglets in large (12 piglets) litters; E (no. = 10), small (eight piglets) low-birth-weight litters; F (no. = 10), large (12 piglets) low-birth-weight litters.

Mortality of low-birth-weight piglets in large litters was greater (P < 0.001) with heavy littermates, but in small litters was no different. Weight gain of piglets until day 3 post partum was not significantly (P > 0.05) affected by littermate weight and litter size, or their interaction. Weight at 21 days post partum was significantly affected by littermate weight, litter size, and their interaction. Low-birth-weight piglets in small litters had significantly higher 21-day weights in large litters (P < 0.01, P < 0.05 and P < 0.05 with littermates of low, average and heavy birth weight respectively). In large but not small litters, low-birth-weight piglets missed more nursing episodes and spent more time in teat disputes than their heavier littermates whether in heavy-birth-weight (P < 0.01), or average-birth-weight (P < 0.05) litters.

Littermate weight may affect the performance of low-birth-weight piglets due to direct competition for access to a functional teat.

Copyright
Corresponding author
E-mail: g_bilkei@yahoo.com
References
Hide All
Aherne F. 1999. Research spotlights techniques to increase piglet survival. International Pig Letter 18: 46.
Beymon N. 1997. Ten ways to foster pigs. Pig International Magazine October 1997: 2023.
Bilkei G. and Biro O. 1999. Der Einfluss des Geburtsgewichtes auf das Absetzgewicht, auf die Saugferkelverluste und Saugferkelerkrankungen der Ferkel. Tierarztliche Umschau 54: 372377.
Bilkei G., Goos T. and Bolcskei A. 1993. Der Einfluss der Anzahl funktionierenden Mammarkomplexe auf Vierwochengewicht in der industriellen Schweinezucht. Praktische Tierarzt 1: 1619.
Bilkei-Papp G. 1994. Perinatal losses — general condition of sows. IV. Effect of parasympathicomymeticum (Carbamylcholin) on the duration of the delivery and perinatal losses. Hungarian Veterinary Journal 11: 683686.
Blackwell T. E. 1988. Studies on the birthweights of pigs. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Minnesota.
Caceres L., Bilkei G., McGil M. and Pena F. J. 2001. The effect of levamisole on the preweaning performance of lightweight born piglets. Medicina Veterinaria 18: 435438.
Cutler R. S., Fahi V. A., Spicer E. M. and Cronin G. M. 1999. Preweaning mortality. In Diseases of swine, eighth edition (ed. Straw B. E., Allaire S.D., Mengeling W. L. and Taylor D. J.), pp. 9851002. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.
English P., Smith W. and Maclean A. 1982. The sow -improving her efficiency. Farming Press, Ipswich.
English P. and Wilkinson V. 1982. Management of the sow and litter in late pregnancy and lactation in relation to piglet survival and growth. In Control of pig reproduction (ed. Cole D. J. A. and Foxcroft G. R.), pp. 479506. Butterworths, London.
Fraser D., Kramer D. L. , Pajor E. A. and Weary D. M. 1995. Conflict and cooperation: sociobiological principles and the behaviour of pigs. Applied Animal Sciences 44: 139157.
Fraser D. and Thompson B. K. 1986. Variation in piglets weight; relationship to suckling behaviour, parity number and farrowing crate design. Canadian journal of Animal Science 66: 3146.
Fraser D., Thompson B. K., Ferguson D. K. and Darroch R. L. 1979. The“teat order” of suckling pigs. 111. Relation to competition within litters. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92: 257261.
Holtcamp A. H. 1998. Farrowing house management types. Proceedings of American Association of Swine Practitioners, pp. 317318.
Horrell I. and Bennett J. 1981. Disruption of teat preferences and retardation of growth following cross-fostering of one week old pigs. Animal Production 33: 99106.
Marcatti N. A. 1986. Effect of cross fostering on piglets preweaning performance. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinaria Zootecnia 38: 413417.
Milligan B. N., Fraser D. and Kramer D. L. 2001. The effect of littermate weight on survival, weight gain, and suckling behaviour of low-birth-weight piglets in cross fostered litters. Swine Health and Production 9: 161166.
Robert S. and Martineau G. P. 1998. Sow-piglet behavioral interactions and the impact of cross-fostering on piglet performance. Proceedings of American Association of Swine Practitioners, pp. 313316.
Straw B. 1997. Veterinary practice: art, science and politics; general thoughts illustrated by cross fostering experiences. Proceedings of American Association of Swine Practitioners, pp. 131.
Straw B. E., Dewey C. E. and Burgi E. J. 1998. Patterns of cross fostering and piglet mortality on commercial US and Canadian swine farms. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 33: 8389.
Svendsen J., Svendsen L. S. and Bengtsson A. C. 1986. Reducing perinatal mortality in pigs. In Diseases of swine, sixth edition (ed. Leman A. D., Straw B., Glock D., Mengeling W. L., Penny R. H. C. and Scholl E.), pp. 813825. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.
Wilkinson L. 1990. The SYSTAT NPAR program system for statistics. Evantson, Illinois.
Zajas-Cruz E., Pitscher P. M. and Parsons T. D. 2000. Motivating and monitoring cross fostering management. Swine Health and Production 8: 269272.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Animal Science
  • ISSN: 1357-7298
  • EISSN: 1748-748X
  • URL: /core/journals/animal-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 1 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 133 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 13th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.