Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T12:51:42.552Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optimum replacement rates in animal breeding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

L. Ollivier
Affiliation:
INRA Station de Génétique quantitative et appliquée, CNRZ 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France
Get access

Summary

The expected annual selection response is a function of selection intensity (i), generation interval (t) and precision (p) of breeding value estimation. These three parameters may, under certain conditions, be reduced to functions of one variable, y, the mean age of breeding animals at culling, which is a simple function of the annual replacement rate. When the number of breeding males and females are different, i and t become functions of two variables ym and yf, the mean ages of males and females at culling. The values of y (or of ym and yt) giving the maximum selection response are established for different domestic species: for individual selection, where the ratio i/t is to be maximized, for selection on a repeatable criterion connected to female reproduction (prolificacy, milk or egg production), where the maximum of ip/t is to be determined, and for male progeny-testing. The results show that, the more prolific a species is, the more rapid the renewal of breeding animals must be and that the renewal should be more rapid for males than for females, particularly in species of low prolificacy. When selecting on female performances which are repeated in time, the optimum renewal rate of females is lowered relative to individual selection on a criterion measured once. Numerical values have been calculated for different species, with given reproduction parameters for each one.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bettini, T. M. 1968. Elementi di Demografia Zootecnica. Produzione Animate, Napoli.Google Scholar
Bettini, T. M. and Matassino, D. 1961. II ciclo di sostituzione dei genitori, la successione delle generazioni, e l'eta media dei genitori alia nascita dei figli. Genetica Agraria 13: 321358.Google Scholar
Falconer, D. S. 1960. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Oliver and Boyd, London.Google Scholar
Hill, W. G. 1972. Estimation of genetic change. I. General theory and design of control populations. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 40: 115.Google Scholar
Lush, J. L. 1937. Animal Breeding Plans. Iowa State College Press, Ames, la.Google Scholar
Ollivier, L. 1972. Note sur le taux optimum de renouvellement annuel des femelles dans la selection du pore. In Journees de la Recherche Porcine en France, 1972, pp. 6367. Institut technique du Pore, Paris.Google Scholar
Smith, C. 1969. Optimum selection procedures in animal breeding. Anim Prod. 11: 433442.Google Scholar